Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:48PM EDT
See Comments (55)
Slate's Seth Stevenson recently posted an intelligent analysis of Apple's inescapable online and offline ad campaign which features two men ("I'm a Mac. And I'm a PC.") encountering anthropomorphized computer issues. The Mac gets through them all with grace, while the PC has nothing but trouble.
Stevenson brilliantly points out why the ads don't work (namely because the guy playing the "Mac" comes across as smug, know-it-all jerk and the "PC" guy is actually quite loveable). But I figured I'd actually look at the technical claims that Apple is making in the pieces. Can an Apple really set you free the way the company claims it can? Let's take a look, point by point. (Follow along with the ads, if you'd like.)
So, Apple's claims are about 50-50, which is pretty much par for the advertising world. The ads are clever, sure, but I wouldn't base a buying decision on them. As always, I recommend trying out a Mac in person either at an Apple store or via a helpful friend. Heck, hang around a Starbucks for a few minutes. Those places are crawling with Mac users. Hmmm, now there's an ad I'd like to see.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
The one about networking, and the camera, is about Mac's universal binary. Japanese (or any other foreign product) are able to communicate with American macs. It's not about domestic-to-domestic product, it's international-to-domestic product usage.
"Networking is easier on a Mac, as is adding peripherals" Note this is not just networking, but any communications with external devices. Have you never run into issues with cameras connecting to XP directly using PTP? That really does seem to work better on a Mac. Also frankly I've had an easier time with USB storage devices on a Mac than on XP. In fact (to diverge from networking) I had one external drive that XP decided to mangle a bit and would no longer write to... but all of the XP drive repair tools hung trying to fiix the directory. On my Mac it took about a minute for Disk Utility to fix the slightly mangled directory structure. "Mac's software bundle spanks Windows.... Macs are easier at creating websites and editing photos. Not really. " Wait, you just said the bundle was much better than Windows for working with photos and....! I mean lets say you get a computer at Christmas, which one is going to be up and making a website or editing photos that day? Furthermore I would say that most people really do not need the vast application that is Photoshop, probably not even Elements. Picassa is good and free but you need to load it apart from getting the computer and it does not have as tight integration with things like .Mac for truly simple web publishing. Yes you can argue that you can load a lot of software on Windows. But I could counter argue there is some software you cannot load on Windows today like Lightroom or Aperture that really offers something valuable (yes Windows will have Lightroom - eventually). "Macs don't have virus problems. Completely true, though the winds of change are upon us as the Mac platform becomes more popular". That statement is incorrect. Here's why. The winds of change have been blowing for about four years now, over the course of those four years over fifteen million Macs have been sold. Fifteen million macs is not an appealing target either for profit or just for fun? Furthermore, with the shift to Intel the counter has been reset - let's say you are a virus writer targeting a buffer overflow. Well which platform are you going to target? You only get one shot and there are not "universal" buffer overflow attacks. Are you going to target the ffteen+ millions macs around today that no-one yet has decided to target (if so, why have you changed your mind)? Or the far smaller numerically Intel Mac population? "You can run Windows on a Mac. Yep. Works pretty well. Costs more to do it, though." Not really when you look at what you get with Macbooks. What other WIndows laptops gives you as easy access to replace the internal HD? That can save a lot right there as many users get larger HD's with laptops. "Walt Mossberg loves Macs. Indeed. I'm not sure that's enough to hang your case on, though. PCs do indeed get rave reviews, not just from the computer press but, yes, from Mossberg as well. I'm sure Mossberg loves ponies, too." Hey - OMG! Ponies! Don't diss ponies man.
For those saying Networking is easier on a Mac tell that to my neighbor who still cant connect to his Treo650. It finds the phone but cant connect to it and he doesnt have any security pieces in place.
Photoshop is faster on a PC, but only because Photoshop for Mac has to run through Rosetta. Something you conveniently left out. This will change with CS 3.
I've had uptime on my Windows XP machine of over a month and half. If you aren't doing something stupid you should be able to leave your computer on for just as long as a Mac.
"I've had uptime on my Windows XP machine of over a month and half." While a month and a half isn't exactly considered to be "restarting all the time" there are much longer uptimes to be had.
The bluetooth piece I definitely have to disagree with. I just switched to my first ever Mac and I have to say that I've never been happier. Setting up my bluetooth phone on my PC was a rediculous pain, and I spent literally hours just trying to get things to transfer right. When I wanted to sync my outlook contacts the way that my phone handled them wouldn't just work so I downloaded a piece of shareware that did a decent job, but still not perfect. On my Mac, having never done it before I had my phone rigged up via bluetooth, my contacts and calendars sync'd in under 5 minutes the VERY first time I used it. It worked like the stuff should have. My phone handled contacts oddly, it handled it. Now I just crank up iSync and spend 30 seconds syncing up. File transfers were equally as easy. For bluetooth there is no comparison. After using PCs since the DOS days and being an absolute power user on Windows, I have to say OSX just hums by comparison. Stuff just works.
There is much more that you could have said about them. I get angery every time i see those ads. Its pretty much just slander.
Disagree about networking - it is true; most users will find configuration as trival as connecting a network cable or selecting their router from a dropdown list. Bluetooth may be sketchy, but I can make it work on a Mac, can't say the same for a PC. Disagree about websites and editing. They're not talking about buying Photoshop, they're talking about iWeb writing your pages for you, built in photo editing with iLife, and Apple really pushes .Mac (though users with Linux/FreeBSD servers have no need for it). Somewhat agree about rebooting. Windows has to do it for minor applications, updates, and when the system gets sluggish. PCs suffer from bitrot, and even Microsoft recommends rebuilding them often. Macs, in my experience, don't have this problem; one can leave them up for months at a time with no adverse effects. Somewhat agree about "fun" -- yes, PCs have more games at the moment. But the "fun" the Mac guy is talking about is being able to create something out of the box, a slideshow, a book, a web page, a movie, a DVD. Macs need more games, or the ability to run Windows ones. As for the Mac guy -- I didn't take a read on him as being arrogant, but rather he's interacting with a friend who doesn't have a clue about the point he's trying to convey.
http://www.technewsology.com/macvspc.html
This entire article seems like it was written by a PC troll. 1) How much trouble do you have to go through to get PC-compatible devices to work on a PC? On a Mac, Mac-compatible devices "just work" (usually anyway) 3) Speed has nothing to do with 'ease'. Macs have a solid reputation for reliability and productivity. 4) Actaully, I have seen Macs with an uptime of 6 months or more. 5) Your claim is almost as cliche as "Macs are only good for graphics" - the ONLY reason there isn't a virus epidemic on the Mac is because malware isn't easily spread. 6) The only reason there aren't many games for Mac is because game developers are in business to make money - would you build a car and then market it to blind people? - not if you want to make money. As for the XBox comment - what would you prefer they use? GameCube? If Apple released a console, it would almost definitely blow the XBox away. 8) For a new PC user, this is a daunting task. And for the PC community, this is likely to be the main reason why there is a virus epidemic on the PC. Try again, bub. Mac will always be #1, you just haven't realized it yet.
The link above posted by solarchaos, http://www.technewsology.com/macvspc.html is a hilarious interpretation, and in reality seems to actually hold true. Mac users really do fart and don't say anything!
Looks like someone's debunking your debunking :) http://www.zerologik.com/2006/06/debunking_the_debunking_of_mac.php
I would agree with the other posters, that your assertion about Macs not being any easier than PC's for creating web sites to be wrong. Your comment about Photoshop being faster on Windows, while perhaps true, is unrelated. There isn't really a casual relationship between something being fast and something being easy to use. When I get a new Mac it has iWeb and most people seem to be able to figure out how to use it to create a simple web page. On Windows, I haven't found a comparable product. Although there is definitely a market out there for one to emerge -- nobody seems to have figure out how to do it for some reason. While the high-end apps on the Mac and Windows (dreamweaver) are for the most part the same, the consumer apps are much different.
I'm still looking for software that will work on a Mac like Citrix GotoMeeting. It doesn't seem to exist.
when it comes down to it, pc's are for people that want to learn how to use a computer..mac's are for people that dont. if you dont learn how to use a pc properly it can bite you pretty hard, but if you take the time to want to understand it, you can go pretty far configuring your computer just the way you like it ..
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2282754844569110939&pr=goog-sl
Great article, but i have to give blow to the usual commenters. I know you want your system to be better but you might just stop shouting about it, that wont help.
"...as does running all the Microsoft security updates..." Just bought a new Macbook a few weeks ago. Running OS X Software Update on it out-of-the-box took longer than it did to run Microsoft Update on XP SP2 after I installed it on my Bootcamp partition.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by pero69 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:07PM EDT Report Abuse
looks like somebody posted the same responses I did just as I started typing mine :( aah well... you're a genius robertncole. with much better timing than myself. :)