Chaos as YouTube ordered to turn over all user viewing histories

Thu Jul 3, 2008 1:27PM EDT

See Comments (107)

Viacom's war against YouTube over the illegal reposting of video content it owns has finally won it a huge victory in the court of law. Last night a judge ruled that YouTube (and owner Google) is required to turn over a mountain of information to Viacom, including every user's IP address and user name and a list of every video that user has ever watched on the service. (Yes, that's a lot of data.) Google is also required to give Viacom a copy of every video it has ever taken down from the YouTube service, regardless of the reason.

The usual user advocates are naturally calling this a catastrophic failure of the courts to recognize users' right to privacy, but the courts have relied on Google's own defense of its data retention tactics (which holds that an IP address alone won't reveal personal information about a user) as a justification for the verdict. That's one thing, but by demanding user names along with IP addresses, that argument goes out the window. Many are already speculating that Viacom will sue the users who watched the videos as a next step. Heck, it's so popular with the RIAA, why not try it here?

Will Google comply with the order? Good question. It's already being speculated that if it does users will file a massive class action suit against Google in retaliation, and they'd be right to do so. Certainly the release of AOL user search history debacle isn't so far behind us that we've forgotten those lessons already (though in fairness, AOL's data release was its own doing, not a legal judgment).

This issue will likely not stop here as the combatants continue to fight it out in court, but in the meantime, the sobering reality is that it's time to rethink what you're watching on YouTube (or any other video sharing service, for that matter), as it's all too likely that's about to become a matter of public record.

Comments on Chaos as YouTube ordered to turn over all user viewing histories

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 2 Posted by jim12957 on Thu Jul 3, 2008 3:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree that if the information 'is' released, we're talking a class-action of record-setting proportions. The information Viacom is requesting is 'far' in excess of what's required ... and 'should not' be handed over. Personally, I'd say the judge, for making such a ruling, shows he has no comprehension of the online world (which makes sense, considering he graduated law school in 1955) ... why do they insist on giveing tech-themed/heavy cases to judges who know nothing about tech?

  • 3 Posted by emv425 on Thu Jul 3, 2008 3:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    It certainly seems like all of our rights to privacy are slowly being taken away. This is an outrage!

  • 4 Posted by crapdirector on Thu Jul 3, 2008 3:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    Too bad we can't sue the courts for their stupid decision making.

  • 5 Posted by bella77427 on Thu Jul 3, 2008 3:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    If the data belonged to someone or an entity and was posted without permission of course someone should be sued. Yet I fail to see why it should be the viewer. I think it should be the individual poster or posters of such a content hence only their information should be requested. They have the need to prove that they had the approval to publish the said data.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.