Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:10PM EDT
See Comments (7)
BlackBerry addicts maybe psychologically chained to their pocket email gadgets... but does that mean they shouldn't be paid for the time the spend working on them?
A growing chorus of warnings is erupting over the use of BlackBerry and similar smart phones, with legal experts saying that it's only a matter of time before employers find themselves sued for issuing the devices to hourly, non-exempt workers. Hourly workers who are issued the devices, says CNBC, may claim they are owed overtime when they are answering questions after regular work hours. "I'll bet anything that a lawsuit is going [to] happen," says one pro quoted in the story.
For the most part, workers who are issued smart phones are considered exempt employees, which means they are salaried and thus not eligible for overtime no matter how many times the boss emails them. But some non-exempt employees use the devices as well, such as tech support workers who are out in the field and need access to information from remote areas.
Posited solutions aren't entirely satisfactory: One attorney suggests non-exempt workers simply not be given the devices at all, or only be allowed to use them during work hours. But such policies may not just be bad for the company, they also have a way of falling out of use during emergencies or simple lax enforcement. All the employment handbooks in the world aren't likely to keep a suit from developing somewhere down the line.
If you manage a company where non-exempt employees use BlackBerrys and the like, legal experts say your best bet is to begin tracking the time they spend on the devices and compensating them for it, too. Expensive? Yes, but cheaper than defending against a class action lawsuit from disgruntled ex-workers.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
LOL, all the employers have to do is actually hire people on a salaried basis and pay them what they are worth... Of course they dont want to do that, so they are open to lawsuits... So the best thing to do is just to pay them off - since they have the phones on them 24/7, just pay them the hourly wages for working 24/7/365, along with the overtime compensation additions for that, and you are set - no more lawsuit worries. Of course, it was just cheaper in the long run to hire them as salaried employees and pay them more in the first place...
Excellent point gabake, that's what I was thinking as I was reading this.
I was lured into an exempt position with a major corporation. I was told that I would be on-call during the interview process. I asked how many hours and to what extent and they misrepresented the facts. Now I am on call answering the phone, emailing and getting called out for work 24x7 350 days out of the year. I have a laptop with Sprint card and have been told my Blackberry is on the way. All employees whether exempt or not should receive some additional compensation for working outside of work hours.
yep
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by gabake420 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:05PM EDT Report Abuse
"...with legal experts saying that it's only a matter of time before employers find themselves sued..." translation: lawyers are fishing for work, and you are an enabler by writing this 'story'