Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:33PM EST
See Comments (10)
The solid-state version of the svelte MacBook Air promises speedier performance and longer battery life than the hard drive-based model—or at least you'd hope so, given the $1,300 premium over the $1,800 base price. But the initial test results are in, and the benefits look marginal, at best.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
darnit patterson!!!!
curiously . . . the more i learn about the macbook air . . . the more i consider getting an asus eee . . . i could get six of those for the price of one macbook air . . . (no ben, you can't have one!!)
I seems to me that nobody really wants to admit that the SSDs are not ready yet. At least not for the price they want to sell them considering that the benefits are not that great. I am not impress with Apple lately and I hate to admit it...
I totally agree with what they're saying. It's not worth that much money to have an ultra-slim notebook. Your really don't need a notebook that light, especially with a 2 and a half hour battery life. I have a regular macbook, which is 5 lbs and is just fine.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by ytech_patterson on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:58PM EDT Report Abuse
@middlenamefrank: My mistake -- "seconds" should have read "minutes." My mistake (although the HDD Air still clocks in markedly faster than does the solid-state version).