TSA Blog: Gadgets Are OK in Carry-on Bags

Thu Feb 7, 2008 10:56AM EST

See Comments (0)

Responding to complaints on its new blog, the TSA says screeners should not be forcing fliers to remove all gadgets—not just laptops—from their carry-on bags. Why the confusion? Apparently, some "local TSA offices" took a little too much initiative.

According to the just-launched TSA blog (by way of Valleywag), complaints began flooding in Monday about agents demanding that travelers place all gadgets—including iPods, cell phones, and "even cords"—in screening bins. Meanwhile, the forums at FlyerTalk began lighting up with complaints as early as January 17, with flyers out of San Francisco International grousing that they'd been told to remove "anything with a power cord" from their bags.

Via its blog, the TSA said it checked out the complaints and found that the new policy "was set up by local TSA offices and was not part of any grand plan across the country," and added that "these practices were stopped on Monday afternoon."

Am I concerned that "local TSA offices" are apparently setting up their own policies willy-nilly? You bet. And just try quoting the rules to a stubborn screener while you're holding your belt and shoes in your hands.

That said, I'm glad the TSA took it upon itself to launch its own blog and take action when complaints started rolling in. The blog even boasts some snarky writing (example: after the policy fix, "BlackBerrys, cords and iPods began to flow through checkpoints like the booze was flowing on Bourbon Street"—not bad, guys) and links to vocal TSA critics like Schneier on Security and Cranky Flier. Hey, it's a start.

Related:
HOORAY BLOGGERS! [TSA blog]
TSA blames nerd-hating policy on rogue agents [Valleywag]

Comments on Hands-on Review: Sidekick LX

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by alangornick on Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    The sidekick still remains the ONLY phone on the market that does IM properly. It dings in my pocket when I get a message and is always online. Until iPhone, Blackberry or some other vendor gets this right on a querty phone i'm sticking with the sidekick. iPhone has a touch screen? Big whoop, maybe if they actually did something useful with that touch screen I'd be more impressed. iPhone is next gen with no actual IM? SMS? How quaint. The sidekick could use some better updating, that's true, but as for what I need it to do, all other phones are still lagging sadly behind.

  • 2 Posted by tjken33 on Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    i agree 100% with u. but i still think they shoulda upped the cam alil bit more. the sk3 cam is/was kinda bad =/

  • 3 Posted by 2tonyn on Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    I switched from the Sidekick II to the Blackberry Pearl. The only thing that I miss on the Sidekick is the keyboard. I thought they left out features to keep them affordable. With the $300 price tag I think they are losing their demographic.

  • 4 Posted by rochelleperry2 on Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:34AM EDT Report Abuse

    I switched from the Sidekick3 to the BB Pearl and then back to Sidekick LX. Although in my opinion the BB is more feature rich device the Sidekick is FUN to use. Its the reason I keep going back to it even though there are some upgrades needed.

  • 5 Posted by myke606 on Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:54AM EDT Report Abuse

    no touch screen? GOOD. That's the thing I hate the most about new phones & mp3 players coming out. If T-Mobile does ever switch to a touch SK I wil not buy it. And this is coming from a die hard MAC fan/user. But I will never purchase a touch screen ipod or iphone. Horrible "feature."

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.