Last HD DVD-Only Studio Goes Blu-Ray

Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:04AM EST

See Comments (14)

As expected, Paramount—the final big movie studio to exclusively support the defeated HD DVD format—has jumped to Blu-ray. That said, several new HD DVD titles are still on tap for the coming months.

Paramount, the studio that released such blockbusters as "Transformers" and the "Mission: Impossible" movies, told the Hollywood Reporter (via High-Def Digest) that it will "look to (begin) releasing our titles on Blu-ray" and that "we will monitor consumer adoption and determine our release plan accordingly." Vague words, although Reuters notes that both Paramount and newly-Blu Universal will probably begin cranking out Blu-ray titles by "late spring or early summer."

Paramount's move represents quite a reversal for both the studio and the HD DVD format itself. The movie house initially supported both Blu-ray and HD DVD; last August, however, Paramount and its subsidiary, Dreamworks, surprised the industry by jumping to HD DVD exclusively, a maneuver that evened up the format war and dealt a major blow to the Blu-ray camp. But in January, Blu-ray regained the lead by wooing format-neutral studio Warner Brothers, and the rest is history.

While all the big movie studios are now aligned with Blu-ray, that doesn't mean that there aren't any HD DVD titles left in the pipe. Indeed, Warners has confirmed that it will continue pressing HD DVD movies through May, and a quick look at the HD DVD release schedule shows upcoming titles such as "Beowolf," "The Assassination of Jesse James," and "The Brave One" this month, "Into the Wild," "No Reservations," "Michael Clayton," "Bee Movie," and "In the Valley of Elah" in March, and "I Am Legend" in April. Not exactly an avalanche of movies, mind you, but hey—for those of us stuck with HD DVD players, it's something.

Related:
Paramount Goes Blu [High-Def Digest]

Comments on Last HD DVD-Only Studio Goes Blu-Ray

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by bikeboywon on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    no one is listing, we can not aford to buy the HD or blu ray movies they cost to much. 30 dollors is to much money. we can live every well without HD or blu ray.

  • 2 Posted by y_92404 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    HD movies cost as much as DVDs did when those were introduced, they aren't that expensive. With HD, digital now looks better than analog did. It's definitley worth the difference in price when you're watching on a 1080p big screen tv. Now I don't have to worry about accidently picking up a title in the tiny "fullscreen" format anymore, unless its an older tv show (Star Trek, coming soon to Blu Ray). So Ben...why did you go with HD-DVD, I though all Apple lovers mindlessly followed Apple, buying everything Apple has its hands into. Apple is part of the BDA (Blu Ray Disc Association). I'd really love an answer to that. Sonys win with the film industry was probably planned from their loss way back with Beta. Since that time Sony pictures popped up and they also have large stakes in a few other film companies as well. It was just a matter of time until another format was began, and Sony had a stronger position, and superior format, this time. I'm not saying Beta was bad, the quality was higher than VHS but the recording length was shorter, too short for full length films. Sony learned, and with Blu Ray has format that can hold a whole full length HD movie with tons of bonus features ON THE DISC!!! NOBODY deserves a refund for their HD-DVD players, you knew that there was a war going on. It's your fault for not doing the research before buying a player. Well, I think I'm gonna go celebrate by going out and buying some more Blu Rays to add to my quickly growing library, about 50 and counting. So...Ben why did you go with HD-DVD again?

  • 3 Posted by magpagbst on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    i always believed that this current format was essentially insignificant in the long run . . . with the advent of regular and hi-def movie rental downloads appearing to snowball (see mac tv and vudu) . . . there wiil be no need to even own any disc player at all . . . i'm not a big advocate of rentals . . . but i wouldn't be averse to paying $30-%50 a month for on demand download access to thousands of regular and hi-def movies . . . this as opposed to buying one or two blu-ray discs a month for the same cost . . . unless the price of blu-ray discs comes down to the twenty dollar range . . . i'll sit this one out . . . by the way . . . i just watched the $15 regular definition dvd of "bourne ultimatum" on my 120 inch front projection screen . . . it was awesome! while blu-ray video is fabulous . . . i've got better things to do with $30 to $40 for something that will effectively be gathering dust on a shelf 99% of the time . . .

  • 4 Posted by svd1001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    well im not surprised, blu-ray does have more storage space and cqapabilities, however i did not think the turn over would happen this soon... it seems to me like everyone is jumping ship.

  • 5 Posted by decart1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    who cares? by that i mean 99% of the people. this whole things reminds me of the tuner wars of the 70's.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.