Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:04AM EST
See Comments (14)
As expected, Paramount—the final big movie studio to exclusively support the defeated HD DVD format—has jumped to Blu-ray. That said, several new HD DVD titles are still on tap for the coming months.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
HD movies cost as much as DVDs did when those were introduced, they aren't that expensive. With HD, digital now looks better than analog did. It's definitley worth the difference in price when you're watching on a 1080p big screen tv. Now I don't have to worry about accidently picking up a title in the tiny "fullscreen" format anymore, unless its an older tv show (Star Trek, coming soon to Blu Ray). So Ben...why did you go with HD-DVD, I though all Apple lovers mindlessly followed Apple, buying everything Apple has its hands into. Apple is part of the BDA (Blu Ray Disc Association). I'd really love an answer to that. Sonys win with the film industry was probably planned from their loss way back with Beta. Since that time Sony pictures popped up and they also have large stakes in a few other film companies as well. It was just a matter of time until another format was began, and Sony had a stronger position, and superior format, this time. I'm not saying Beta was bad, the quality was higher than VHS but the recording length was shorter, too short for full length films. Sony learned, and with Blu Ray has format that can hold a whole full length HD movie with tons of bonus features ON THE DISC!!! NOBODY deserves a refund for their HD-DVD players, you knew that there was a war going on. It's your fault for not doing the research before buying a player. Well, I think I'm gonna go celebrate by going out and buying some more Blu Rays to add to my quickly growing library, about 50 and counting. So...Ben why did you go with HD-DVD again?
i always believed that this current format was essentially insignificant in the long run . . . with the advent of regular and hi-def movie rental downloads appearing to snowball (see mac tv and vudu) . . . there wiil be no need to even own any disc player at all . . . i'm not a big advocate of rentals . . . but i wouldn't be averse to paying $30-%50 a month for on demand download access to thousands of regular and hi-def movies . . . this as opposed to buying one or two blu-ray discs a month for the same cost . . . unless the price of blu-ray discs comes down to the twenty dollar range . . . i'll sit this one out . . . by the way . . . i just watched the $15 regular definition dvd of "bourne ultimatum" on my 120 inch front projection screen . . . it was awesome! while blu-ray video is fabulous . . . i've got better things to do with $30 to $40 for something that will effectively be gathering dust on a shelf 99% of the time . . .
well im not surprised, blu-ray does have more storage space and cqapabilities, however i did not think the turn over would happen this soon... it seems to me like everyone is jumping ship.
who cares? by that i mean 99% of the people. this whole things reminds me of the tuner wars of the 70's.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by bikeboywon on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:07PM EDT Report Abuse
no one is listing, we can not aford to buy the HD or blu ray movies they cost to much. 30 dollors is to much money. we can live every well without HD or blu ray.