Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:17PM EDT
See Comments (13)
Yes, we're seeing more and more headlines about viruses, worms, and other types of malware targeting the Mac. But before you start panicking, read on.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
One reason that Macs are less vulnerable to virus is that virus don't spread well with a platform that is only 5% of the installed base. This is just simple math of viral expansion. if you have 90% of installed base then the change of you interacting with a similar host is high, 90% when you send an email or even chat. But when you are 5% then you are likely to email the 90% and your virus will not spread well. Mac owners are not necessarily emailing generally other mac owners. Simple mathematics favors Windows viruses and helps discourage malicious code writers from targeting macs. it is just not efficient and the potential for viral explosion of their code is strongly diminished. Frank Levinson
Only 0.16% of MACs ever get infected. I like those odds! But a good reason why this number is so low is how the OS was developed. It made it very hard to wedge a virus in there to do damage to the system. Any damage done by most MAC viruses is very specific and easily automatically rectifiable. That is definitely the sign of a GOOD OS.
The vulnerabilities in Windows made it easy for even the simple hackers to enter. "50,000 Windows viruses (according to some estimates, at least) are currently circulating in the wild". I have several security software programs running to protect from intrusion openings that were left in Windows OS. It slows down my system but is necessary. Bill Gates made billions on his sorry-a operating system and now is giving it away by the bushels instead of fixing his product. What a fraud.
All I can say is that I've owned Macs since 1984 and have NEVER been hacked until last year. I now have the awesome, completely wireless MacBook Air. I have never used Norton or other "anti-virus" rip-offs on my Macs. I have never been hacked on the OS-X side but, wait: I was indeed hacked ONCE when I installed Windoze Vista on a partition on my last PowerBook. I used Boot Camp, and within minutes (I'm not kidding!) a rootkit had been installed on my Windoze partition. So bye-bye Windoze. The only reason I had it was to install my Sony Reader books for travel. I've dumped that pig and have a Kindle on order. It just totally amazes me when people say, "Oh, I can't use OS-X at work." Chances are you're using MS-Office and it is totally transparent on Mac. You don't need to be a slave to M$. Another issue: "I can't play games on a Mac." LOL! What I hear all the time is most Windoze people are only staying with Windoze because the "games aren't there for Mac." That tells me that Windoze people are only using Windoze to play games. Games. Unbelievable. What about stand-alone game consoles? And then get the best OS (and machines) on the planet! Unless all you care about is "playing games." Me, I compute. You, ??? BTW, the last issue with an Apple "bug" (if you will) was a macro in MS-Word...created by Guess Who? Microsoft. In 1997. It just seems to me that all Windoze users care about is gaming. How sad is that? Me, I run my entire household on Macs. Never been hacked, never had to pay for anti-virus software, never had to call Geek Squad. How about you?
Sony's Playstation 3 has received a huge amount of hype with its over-the-top high definition graphi ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by sharon_0730 on Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:19PM EDT Report Abuse
All of the information is common-sense, but I would still get the anitvirus for a Mac still.