Baby, it's you—in 34 years

Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:48PM EDT

See Comments (54)

After taking a gander at myself through the eyes of this on-the-Web aging software, I've gotta say—I'm glad I don't smoke.

These freaky-enough-to-scare-the-kids photos are courtesy of Age-Me.com, a site that uses facial age progression technology (dubbed "April") to give you a peek at your beautiful self—decades into the future.

Fair warning before you get too excited: The site isn't free. In fact, it costs a cool $20 for a total of four age progressions. Kinda pricey, if you ask me—luckily, Yahoo! pays me to try stuff like this, so I went ahead and plunked down my twenty bucks.

Anyway, that picture on the left is the projected me at age 72, assuming I've been eating my vegetables and generally behaving myself. The snapshot on the right? That's me after countless packs of cigarettes and too many Big Macs. (Looks like my hair made out OK, though.)

The software, which made its debut on the Web a few months ago, creates the wrinkly, bloaty images based on images of about 7,000 people "of all ages, ethnicities and lifestyle habits," according to April developer Emega Imaging.

The setup is pretty simple: You just take a snapshot of yourself (in color, in front of a plain background, no smiling allowed), upload it to the service, and the select a few "lifestyle" factors, such as smoking, exposure to the sun, and how much weight you plan on gaining in the coming decades.

Once April is done processing your picture, you just click the "play" button to watch yourself get old and gray (all the way up to 72); there's also a slider that you can drag back and forth.

The April software is slated to power a mirror that takes your snapshot and displays how you'll look in six months—the perfect incentive for cutting down on those cupcakes.

Don't look for the so-called "persuasive mirror" at Wal-Mart anytime soon however; according to ABC News.com, it's still undergoing testing and will probably end up in hospitals rather than your bathroom (initially, at least).

Related:
A Look Into the Future -- and Sometimes It Ain't Pretty [ABC News.com]

Comments on Baby, it's you—in 34 years

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by ryanbonick on Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sounds pretty cool. Shelling out 20$ doesn't sound nice though...

  • 4 Posted by cstopher@prodigy.net on Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    This can't be accurate. Not everybody ages the same way. My mom died at 85 and did not look much over 60

  • 5 Posted by ruthpannell@sbcglobal.net on Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    What happens if you are 100 and want to see yourself in later years? And anyway, why would you want to do this? C'mon.. looking in the mirror is scary enough.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.