Mac cloners to Apple: Come and get us

Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:39AM EDT

See Comments (19)

The company that began selling a $399 Mac clone earlier this week is still in business, and it's even got a new, $999 model with more horsepower. Meanwhile, lawyers are saying that Apple might have a tough time fighting the Miami-based Psystar in court.

[Update: Psystar, the company that claims to be selling the Mac clones, is coming under scrutiny after bloggers failed to find its office—or, indeed, any solid record that the business actually exists. The site, which has been sporadically on- and offline in the past few days, was up the last time I checked (around 5:30 p.m. EST), but I'd suggest holding onto your cash until more details emerge.]

InformationWeek got a hold of a Psystar employee (identified only as "Robert") who said that the company will continue selling its Mac clone, now dubbed the Open Computer (it was called the "OpenMac" on Monday). "We're not breaking any laws," said Robert.

The Open Computer, as you may recall, is the new PC-like beige box that's designed to run Mac OS X with the help of various emulators and drivers. Psystar charges $399 for the Open Computer itself, and it will pre-install Mac OS X if you buy a copy of the OS.

Of course, there's that sticky provision in Apple's user license for OS X "Leopard" that forbids installing the OS on non-Apple hardware.

But according to lawyers contacted by Wired News, the penalties for violating the license tend to be pretty weak—maybe just the wholesale cost of Leopard, which constitutes "a few dollars." And if Psystar is buying Leopard from a legit distributor, Apple wouldn't be able to go after Psystar directly.

That said, Apple may have another weapon against Psystar, according to Wired News—software updates. In its FAQ, Psystar warns that some Apple software updates may be "decidedly non-safe" for the Open Computer, requiring a reinstallation of Leopard.

So (a la hacked iPhones), Apple could simply roll out some must-have updates that are specifically "non-safe" for the Open Computers, forcing Open Computer owners to stick with outdated version of OS X.

In any case, the $399 Open Computer is still on sale—along with a $999 juiced-up version called the OpenPro Computer, which comes with a faster processor and a dedicated GeForce video card.

Personally, I'm all for it—more choice is better, and if you don't like Psystar's beige boxes, by all means, cough up the cash for Apple's aluminum monolith.

What's your take? Would you consider a Mac clone, even if software updates were iffy?

Related:
Mac Clone Maker Psystar Vows To Challenge Apple EULA [InformationWeek]
Forget the Courts — Apple May Fight Mac Clones With Tech [Wired News]

Comments on Mac cloners to Apple: Come and get us

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by kwd1964 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:26AM EDT Report Abuse

    Mac's continued attempts to block use of its software are ridiculous and are why most users "choose" Microsoft. Even though the Mac OS has been better for years, people are not willing to sheck out twice as much for a less powerful machine than they can get in a PC that actually has competition. Maybe it is time for the DOJ to look at Mac's practices; particularly if they do sabotage software that was legitimately purchased. Anyone remember the IE Anti-trust trial? MS had deliberately caused Netscape to crash.

  • 2 Posted by jirojas on Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:38AM EDT Report Abuse

    I hate Apple, greedy ----- s. Go Psystar!

  • 3 Posted by matt_archbold2002 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:54AM EDT Report Abuse

    I would of thought that Apple would of released an inexpensive desktop by now to attract those that are looking for basic PC's, but i guess it will take someone else to do it.

  • 4 Posted by coolkyle4@snet.net on Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:14AM EDT Report Abuse

    i hate apple and i hate macs os, but i would choose pystar over apple anyday

  • 5 Posted by giovanna3637 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:20AM EDT Report Abuse

    Apple products are great and I am an Apple finatic but I have become very upset with the companies practices of locking out competition to maximize their profit. Yes, by contolling both the hardware and software, things may run smoother (an argument I have read many times in reference to Apple) but competition breeds tech advancement and lower prices for the consumer. I would be very happy if more companies were building machines that would run mac software. I do not understand how they are not sued for Anti-trust issues just like Bill Gates was!!

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.