American Apparel to track its clothing with RFID

Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:15AM EDT

See Comments (273)

The hip clothing retailer is set to roll out "item-level" RFID tags to track its inventory, although there are still lingering questions about what'll happen to the chip in that hoodie you just bought.

The RFID Journal reports that American Apparel launched a trial chipping program at a single New York City location late last year, and plans on rollout out RFID tracking to 16 more Gotham stores over the next three months, with a national rollout to follow.

Now, there's nothing new about retailers using RFID tags to track their inventory—but as the RFID Journal points out, the chips are usually embedded in single cases or pallets, not individual items. American Apparel will be one of the first retailers to chip each and every shirt, sweater, and sock.

So, how do we feel about this? Well, for its part, American Apparel says it’ll have better-stocked stores, with "one of everything on the floor"—meaning you'll always find your size and color on the shelf. And since it'll take less time to take inventory (just two clerks for two hours a week, versus four employees taking eight hours a week, according to RFID Journal), you'll get more help while you're shopping.

That said, what happens to those RFID chips when you walk out the door? For its pilot program, American Apparel clerks removed the chips from clothes once they were sold, the Journal reports, but after the rollout, the tags will remain in the garments you buy. [Update: The chips will be on the price tags, not woven into the garments themselves; see below.]

RFID Journal said that American Apparel has yet to detail exactly how—or if—it plans on deactivating the chips once your T-shirt is bought and paid for.

While I seriously doubt American Apparel has anything nefarious up its sleeves, the company would be well advised to detail its RFID privacy policies, pronto, and nip these nagging questions in the bud.

What do you think—are you all for "item-level" RFID tracking if it means always finding your size and getting better service? Or are you worried that Big Brother wants to track your new V-neck?

Update: A representative from American Apparel has responded with a clarification—the RFID chip will be on the price tag, not sewn into the garments themselves. His full reponse follows:

I am the Information Systems Director at American Apparel. I would like to request that you remove incorrect information from your article "American Apparel to track its clothing with RFID."

American Apparel will not be sewing RFID tags into the garment itself. The chips will be embedded in price tags, which are easily removable at any point by the customer.

While I think it's important to encourage people to discuss privacy issues and challenge new technologies, we do not believe that there is any privacy implication here. The tags contain no personal information, at any point, and can easily be removed by the customer (most stores do not remove price tags for you in case of returns).

I think you need to clarify this point, there are hundreds of comments taking your words very literally and I want to prevent further confusion.


Related:
American Apparel Makes a Bold Fashion Statement With RFID [RFID Journal]

Comments on American Apparel to track its clothing with RFID

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by rapmetal47 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    God, I'm scared of Big Brother. I don't want the government to spy on me.

  • 7 Posted by silverfire54@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    Add a chip, jack the price up (somebody has to pay for the chip). Then add an extra tax for the chip. The good old American way.

  • 8 Posted by g-parker@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    do we really need this chip? is it really going to make it better for shoppers to find their size? I think not. when your size is not on the shelf, your out of luck. No chip will make the clerk go to the back and get some more of your size anymore than they do now. there is no real need to put a chip in every article of clothes. as far as inventory, when the clerk scans your item/rings it up, the store's computer updates the inventory.

  • 11 Posted by truqueen@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    Horrible thought. Horrible idea. One thing definately leads to another. I won't buy anything I know has a chip in it.

  • 12 Posted by 1dahrins@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    Do we really want the government to have that much control over it's citizens? Doesn't the government and corporatocracy already have too much power? Power that is used against its own citizens? I believe the cons far outweigh the pros. Yes, it makes doing business more efficient for a select market, but at what price? Once this is approved, will the chip be limited to just clothing? Will they then start imbedding chips in infants at birth so as the child grows into an adult, Big Brother can track our exact whereabouts 24 hours a day? Where will this lead going forward? Wake up, people, we are living George Orwell's 1984!!!! Where do you think it started?

  • 13 Posted by sgizzy@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm not anti-government or anti-technology, but this is crossing the line. American Apparel's claim that they will have better stocked or more efficient stores will only benefit their bottom line at the risk of my privacy. No thanks. I'll shop elsewhere.

  • 14 Posted by pb169bp on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    First off lets see? American Apparel? could that be a chinese company using the name like lets say al's place to keep people comming back? There are others but none the less if you need to know whats going on in peoples lives you need to get one and as for the gov forget it they do this crap anyway. American Apparel will soon change to Joes big Socks or some crap just a matter of time.

  • 15 Posted by jabair@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    It is sad that RFID has to be so insecure of their selves to have to track their clothing, to be nosey in peoples lives. Paranoid is a good way to put it like some one else stated in their post(comment)about the chips to track clothing. I am one whom will not buy any Levi, Levi Struss, or Dockers for the mere fact they have put chips in their clothing line. How RUDE. I too will be sticking to GAP as opposed to American apperal or keep going to the good will to purchase clothing that does not have the chips in them.

  • 16 Posted by sbmiller56@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    i will never knowingly buy any thing with a tracking device in it . maybe on children then maybe they would not go missing so often. but for me i fought for our freedom from 1969 to 1970 ! and will not take a chance of looseing one tiny bit of it.you can talk about cell phones credit cards and there are a lot more just think about it but thats life be happy and live it or chek out but i will never wear a tracking device on my body . how can anybody say it is only traceable for a few inches did you test it your self. bull!!!! .

  • 17 Posted by ronmaldy@pacbell.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    This whole thing is absurd, thw chip, RFID, is radio frequency Identification, radio frequencies are everywhere your cell phone, your wireless pc etc. also they can be tracked with the right equipment thus making it easier for someone that you don't want to know will be able to know where you go and what you do. I personally think that this is invasion of privacy and I will not buy anything from American Clothing or any other company who installs RFID's in any product.

  • 18 Posted by mikie136@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    George Orwell's 1984 could not even dream of ways that the govt has to track us now. "Security" cameras everywhere tracking our movements, dna profiling, chips in our money, and now chips in clothing. Where will it all lead to? Hitler and Stalin would have loved this technology.

  • 19 Posted by jlm0510@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    What stores are owned by American Apparel? I'll think twice before shopping there.

  • 20 Posted by cgollnick on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    The tag is buried in the clothes and will not be removed. The idea is that if an item is stollen it will alarm if somebody comes back into any branch store either in a bag for return or wearing it on your back.

  • 21 Posted by pjmoe3@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    Not only lose your privacy but the price goes up on the merchandise to cut two jobs, more money in there pocket for the cost of jobs cut and more money out of ours to pay for the chips, Added expense. The American people need to stick together to stop the craziness of this. Also lose our right to privacy to a clothing store. RIDICULOUS I am absolutely positive there clothes are not that great.

  • 22 Posted by peborgh@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    Please go to the nearest tracking station to give a sample of your DNA and have your RFID implanted. Be a good consumer.

  • 23 Posted by cgerath@verizon.net on Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:00AM EDT Report Abuse

    I work retail and the chip is not in the price tag. It is usually sown into the product or stuck somewhere in the box's corrugated cardboard. People should be well advised that when they buy something that has one of these chips and use any form of credit, debit, or check, the company can track exactly what you bought, where you live, and solict you with advertisements based on that information. The technology is there to link that chip to each person's identity through the common methods of payment, escept cash. I think it is scary to know that they can use this chip to track me all the way home if it is not deactivated, even if I pay cash. Might be good for those foolish enough to shop lift, but what about us honest people? And who's to say that someone couldn't use the tracking for purposes of stalking or more heinous crimes? All because you bought a t-shirt and were tracked! For myself, I will not be shopping at this store any more. I like my privacy!

  • 24 Posted by foxrox@pacbell.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    I could see it as a great way to catch shoplifters. One would hope that once scanned for purchase it should be deactivated. The bottom line for all companies is the bottom line. Inventory hours mean money. One never knows but once one starts others follows. Time tells.

  • 25 Posted by lester.lunch@sbcglobal.net on Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:22AM EDT Report Abuse

    I want my mommie! Next they will be placing it in Rocky Road ice cream!!! No child left behind you know. As this is childs play.The mark of the beast is already here Paypal is now instituted in every ebay transaction. You can not buy or sell without it.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.