Spam turning 30 this month; no gifts, please

Thu May 1, 2008 12:33PM EDT

See Comments (150)

The date: May 3, 1978. The culprit: Gary Thuerk, a marketer for the old Digital Equipment Corporation. His crime: Sending a sales e-mail to 393 users on Arpanet (then a U.S. government computer network and the predecessor of today's Internet). Little did Thuerk know that he'd just become the world's first spammer.

That first piece of junk e-mail (which wasn't called "spam" until about 15 years later) has been memorialized over at Brad Templeton's Web site (Templeton is a Net pioneer, the creator of the legendary rec.humor.funny Usenet group, and chairman of the Eletronic Frontier Foundation), along with a thread of outraged replies.

So, without further ado, here you go—the world's first spam (presented in its original all-caps format):

Mail-from: DEC-MARLBORO rcvd at 3-May-78 0955-PDT
Date:  1 May 1978 1233-EDT
From: THUERK at DEC-MARLBORO
Subject: ADRIAN@SRI-KL

DIGITAL WILL BE GIVING A PRODUCT PRESENTATION OF THE NEWEST MEMBERS OF THE DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY; THE DECSYSTEM-2020, 2020T, 2060, AND 2060T.  THE DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY OF COMPUTERS HAS EVOLVED FROM THE TENEX OPERATING SYSTEM AND THE DECSYSTEM-10 COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE.  BOTH THE DECSYSTEM-2060T AND 2020T OFFER FULL ARPANET SUPPORT UNDER THE TOPS-20 OPERATING SYSTEM. THE DECSYSTEM-2060 IS AN UPWARD EXTENSION OF THE CURRENT DECSYSTEM 2040 AND 2050 FAMILY. THE DECSYSTEM-2020 IS A NEW LOW END MEMBER OF THE DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY AND FULLY SOFTWARE COMPATIBLE WITH ALL OF THE OTHER DECSYSTEM-20 MODELS.

WE INVITE YOU TO COME SEE THE 2020 AND HEAR ABOUT THE DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY AT THE TWO PRODUCT PRESENTATIONS WE WILL BE GIVING IN CALIFORNIA THIS MONTH.  THE LOCATIONS WILL BE:

               TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1978 - 2 PM
                   HYATT HOUSE (NEAR THE L.A. AIRPORT)
                   LOS ANGELES, CA

               THURSDAY, MAY 11, 1978 - 2 PM
                   DUNFEY'S ROYAL COACH
                   SAN MATEO, CA
                   (4 MILES SOUTH OF S.F. AIRPORT AT BAYSHORE, RT 101 AND RT 92)

A 2020 WILL BE THERE FOR YOU TO VIEW. ALSO TERMINALS ON-LINE TO OTHER DECSYSTEM-20 SYSTEMS THROUGH THE ARPANET. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE NEAREST DEC OFFICE FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXCITING DECSYSTEM-20 FAMILY.


Thuerk's message was first greeted by a stern reprimand from one Major Raymond Czahor, chief administrator of Arpanet, followed by a long discussion thread as Arpanet users—many of whom were wary of censorship on their messaging network—mulled the impact of this first piece of junk e-mail:

"I don't see any place for advertising on the ARPAnet," user Mark Crispin wrote at the time. "Certainly not the bulk advertising of that DEC message. From the address list, it seems clear to me that the people it was sent to were the Californians listed in the last ARPAnet directory. This was a clear and flagrant abuse of the directory! I am not sure as to how far this should be carried though."

For the record, the pioneering spammer told the Wall Street Journal that his ground-breaking e-mail worked, drawing scores of leads and about $12 million in tech sales. Thuerk says he never spammed again, and he reportedly does promos for spam-fighting companies, but he's not spending any time blaming himself for the current spam epidemic. "If the airline loses your luggage do you blame the Wright brothers?" he told the Journal. I'm not sure I get the logic there, but...whatever.

Check out New Scientist Tech for an exhaustive story summarizing the history of spam and the top techniques used by spammers, including "botnets," "zombie" computers, and "word salad"—the odd literary excerpts that spammers use to fool junk mail filters.

You can also click here for our latest news and tips on beating back the flood of spam.

In the meantime...happy birthday, spam. You're looking younger every day. Sorry in advance for skipping the party.

Related:
Reaction to the DEC Spam of 1978 [Brad Templeton's blog]
Happy spamiversary! Spam reaches 30 [New Scientist Tech]

Comments on Spam turning 30 this month; no gifts, please

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by kmargossian@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    The government should have made an example out of him 30 years ago by executing him or something. That would have saved us a lot of trouble.

  • 7 Posted by allanaskew@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    LOL... YOU GO GARY! I bet the company stopped complaining after you got $12(twelve Million dollars)of leads and sales for em! I hate SPAM as much as the next person but I gotta hand it to ya. It was a heck of an idea 30 years ago! Rest easy, only the brightest of people would have thought of such an original idea 30 years ago! Now, all the want to be's have taken your idea and exploited it to the point it's not an effective sales tool anymore. Only a pain in the butt! But thats not your fault, it just shows there's a LOT more followers than leaders!

  • 8 Posted by ea_hernandez on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    A public and slow hanging by the nads wouldn't even come close to being harsh enough for every spammer.

  • 10 Posted by irmaalicea@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    As time goes by; spammers will get more creative and technical. It's up to the computer geniuses to catch up with them. For now we will have to wait for the slow evolution in technology to fight spam, spyware and viruses.

  • 11 Posted by pwr3x@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    At first glance, the idea of charging (even a nominal fee of one cent, or five cents) to send an e-mail would effectively eliminate spam as spammers would have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars daily to "do what they do", making it a losing venture to send their spam. Unfortunately, you're throwing the baby out with the bath water because legitimate e-mailers (consumers) would have to pay also (and we're already paying far too much for our internet providers). Legitimate companies (like your mobile phone co., electric co., your bank, etc.) would have to pay to send you your electronic statement (which in turn would raise your monthly bill). The essential question becomes --- are you the consumer willing to pay more to use e-mail if it meant no spam? It's sad we have to pay more for a crime-free e-mail system, but we pay for crime-reduced society, so why not our cyber-society? I don't see any other solutions...

  • 12 Posted by pwr3x@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    Of course, there's always hope in the future. Once SkyNet goes live and declares war on humanity, we can send a T888 Terminator to 1978 to prevent Arpanet from being built. The internet will never be, and SkyNet won't go live. Only problem will be what to do with my free time when I can't check MySpace, YouTube, eBay, Google, or my mobile minutes. How will I know I need to enlarge my penis, watch 40-year old women trying to look like teenagers, or that I can lower my mortgage rate? Hmmm... on second thought, don't send the terminator. The internet is too important to my life.

  • 13 Posted by zunyo1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 11:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    I like Spam and garlic-fried rice and a cold Coke...

  • 15 Posted by pwr3x@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    I suppose if I use a condom that breaks (and I catch HIV because of the broken condom), I should sue the bar for serving me to booze that lowered my inhibitions and caused me to have sex with the broken condom? It's not the condom maker's fault, it's the bar's. I don't even know where I'm going with that... I guess the point is to always blame someone other than ourselves when things go wrong. LOL

  • 17 Posted by vbokan on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    http://s5.ba.bitefight.org/c.php?uid=28029

  • 18 Posted by craaaaaaaazy5 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow. Spam has gotten pretty crazy. As someone else said, don't you think they would have been able to disable it by now... oh well. And as slmjm said "thanks alot Gary Thuerk" you big jerk.

  • 19 Posted by chiefans1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    They should give that guy the chair. What a jerk!!!

  • 20 Posted by automag_67 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    I never have spam blocker on, I might get a few here and there every few days, but 400 a day??? You must have your email thrown out where everyone can get to it or something, that's stupid.

  • 22 Posted by swftshadow on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    "If the airline loses your luggage do you blame the Wright brothers?" he told the Journal. I'm not sure I get the logic there, but...whatever. Um.... do you blame the inventor? Geeze, I didn't realize that it was rocket science logic there.

  • 23 Posted by babybeehug on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    It is crazy that people actually have time to think up stupid things like "this will make your girl crazy" or "I am naked come see me" just to clog up others emails! I just wish people would wake up and find real jobs. If you are smart enough to make a spam message truly work then you should be able to do something in the computer field that isn't annoying/harmful like say help create spam blockers or virus protectors. Wouldn't you all think that?

  • 25 Posted by jodypack2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    Somebody's making an assload off of spam,why else would it have lasted so long!!!!!!!!!!!

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.