Sprint's WiMAX dreams get a $3.2B shot in the arm

Wed May 7, 2008 9:53AM EDT

See Comments (7)

Just a month ago, Sprint's plans for a national, $5 billion WiMAX network looked decidedly shaky; the planned launch of a handful of markets was delayed, Sprint's balance sheet looked iffy, and rumors that tech titans such as Google, Comcast, and Time Warner would come to the rescue didn't materialize.

But today's announcement gives Sprint's hopes for a national WiMAX network—one that could potentially bathe the country in wireless broadband goodness—new life, as well as a strategic jump on competitors AT&T and Verizon Wireless. 

So, here's the deal: Sprint and its once-skittish dance partner Clearwire have agreed (at long last) to combine their WiMAX businesses into a single entity, to be known henceforth as, well, Clearwire. (Sprint's Xohm unit—and the cool "Xohm" name—will be absorbed into the new company.)

Meanwhile, Google, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, are back in the picture, along with Intel and cable provider Bright House, and they've all agreed to sink about $3.2 billion into the new Clearwire venture.

According to the New York Times, Google could potentially become the search engine for the new WiMAX network, while Intel will work on the chips that'll drive the technology.

And why the interest by cable operators Bright House, Comcast, and Time Warner? Well, look at it this way: A national WiMAX network could threaten the broadband cable business (if we all had WiMAX access, who'd need a cable modem?), so the carriers want a piece of the wireless action.

It looks like many details still need to be worked out—for example, the exact timing of a full, nationwide WiMax rollout—but overall it's exciting news. Ubiquitous wireless broadband is the future—it's just a question of how soon. With the proper funding, the first commercial Sprint/Clearwire WiMAX markets could start popping up by the end of the year. Meanwhile, the 4G LTE networks planned by AT&T and Verizon Wireless are still a few years out.

If you're still not clear on this whole WiMax thing, click here for our primer.

So—who's ready to ditch their broadband DSL/cable modems and go totally wireless...eventually?

Related:

A Technology Consortium Plans a Wireless Network [The New York Times]

Comments on Sprint's WiMAX dreams get a $3.2B shot in the arm

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by michaelshows on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    Some of these things just sound obsurd to me. Who exactly needs the "convenience" of having wireless internet anywhere you go? I guess it's a "build it and they will come" mentality. Who would have thought 15 years ago people would be using 1000 minutes/month on their cell phones everywhere? Probably people more cynical than me would have, and that's saying something. I guess I should expect the "douchebags on laptops" thing to extend so far beyond Starbucks that I will actually have to wait on people in the grocery store to finish their blog and realize the cashier is waiting for them to pay.

  • 7 Posted by jaxbear34 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    First of all...The name of the company is Clearwire...not Sprint, Xohm or anything else you may think it is. Clearwire is running the game...the have the knowledge, equipment and expertise to roll out WiMax correctly. I wish the people at Yahoo would get it right. Also...magpagbst...you have no idea what your talking about. verizon wireless is a piece of junk...I already know you will be the last to switch over.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.