Fri May 9, 2008 10:04AM EDT
See Comments (10)
Today's kids are having much more trouble buying M-rated games than I ever did sneaking into R-rated movies, according to a new government report.
Ars Technica got its hands on a recent survey by the Federal Trade Commission, which sent a squad of secret shoppers—13-to-16-year-olds, to be exact—to retailers across the country. Their mission: To see how easily the undercover kids could buy M-rated games, which are intended only for gamers 17 and over.
The result? 80 percent of the FTC's teen agents were turned away, a 42 percent improvement over the 2006 findings. And consider this: In the FTC's 2000 survey, only 15 percent of retailers stopped minors from buying M-rated games. Looks like someone's getting the message.
In fact, it turns out that retailers are much more strict with games than they are with movie tickets or DVDs. According to the FTC, about 35 percent of its 13-to-16-year-old secret shoppers were able to buy tickets to R-rated movies, while 47 percent had no trouble buying R-rated DVDs.
Of course, the numbers aren't stopping legislators—looking to make political hay from the "Grand Theft Auto IV" brouhaha—from (again) proposing laws that would force game retailers to check IDs. As Ars Technica points out, most of these laws have been struck down on constitutional grounds.
So, what do you think—would you support a law requiring game retailers to check IDs before selling M-rated video games? Or should we allow retailers to regulate themselves, as movie theaters and video stores do?
Related:
FTC report: retailers clamping down on M-rated game sales [Ars Technica]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Post #1, I get what you are saying. However, Ben is asking if you would support "getting carded" when buying a game, not do you think kids should play those games. You state that kids should play the game as long as it is fine with the parent. What if I don't want my 9 year old daughter playing GTA? If there is no enforcement, it does not work. I say yes, let us ID people when buying games, DVD, and theater tickets just like we do with alcohol and cigarettes. If it is OK with the parents, they can buy them or accompany their minor kids to the show. Thanks for the blog Ben.
let the stores regulate themselves-seems silly to put an i.d law on m-rated video games.it's not as if it's cigarettes or beer. let the parents decide if the games are o.k to play.
From the FTC report, it looks to me like the videogame industry is successfully self-policing. The statistic of M-rated games sold to under-age persons is down from them same statistic two years ago, and even more impressive is the improvement in statistics from the 2000 sample. I'm currently more concerned with the alarming statistic of how many unrated DVDs are making it into the hands of minors. Its also disconcerting in the lack of change in R-rated movie ticket sales to unaccompanied minors--while the other industries show a definite declining trend, the ticket sales has shown very little difference from the 2000 sample.
Well I think the gaming industry seems to be doing a pretty good job of regulating itself. Not without exceptions mind you, but pretty good. I think our lawmakers time would be better spent on other matters.
Windows Vista is Microsoft's new Operating system. My favorite things about the new OS: the graphics ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by reiddame on Fri May 9, 2008 11:12AM EDT Report Abuse
i think kids should play the games they want as long as its fine with the parent.....if the kid doesn have enough since not to do the things in real life then he was already ----- ed up in the head STOP BLAMING GAMES it may give ideas but if a kid is dumb not to realise its entertainment its not real then that kid deserve some counciling