Thu May 22, 2008 3:09PM EDT
See Comments (6)
The large-format movie company is set to raise the curtains on its first all-digital screens in July—just in time for "The Dark Knight," which was partially shot in IMAX—with 130 IMAX Digital theaters slated to arrive in the coming months.
While thousands of standard movie screens are going digital (and even 3-D) this year, today's IMAX theaters still use good, old-fashioned film—albeit, "large-format" 70MM film that crams the equivalent of 70 megapixels into every frame.
The images produced by "traditional" IMAX projectors are certainly dazzling, but with IMAX reels weighing between 300 and 500 pounds each—and prints costing $22,000 and up, compared to $1,000 for a typical 35MM print, according to USA Today—the IMAX format was in danger of going the way of Cinerama, another eye-popping but prohibitively expensive big-screen format.
IMAX says its new digital projectors, capable of displaying both standard and 3-D IMAX movies, have passed the Pepsi challenge with test audiences—and I'd certainly hope so, given that we're expected to shell out $3 extra (or more) for the full-on "IMAX Experience."
Personally, I'm looking forward to checking out "The Dark Knight," which reportedly boasts four sequences shot with IMAX cameras—apparently a first for a full-length Hollywood film.
Unfortunately, besides "Dark Knight" (opening July 18) and the just-released bomb "Speed Racer," only one other big release is getting the IMAX treatment this summer: "Kung Fu Panda." Greaaaat.
So, what about you—would you be willing to cough up more cash to Batman in IMAX?
Related:
IMAX makes a dramatic comeback [USA Today]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
not paying more for better quality for one time, thats wut dvds are fpr
Yes I will pay the extra for the IMAX version of Batman- after seeing the first trailer in 1080P when it came out last year, I decided I had to. BUT the question remains: "how high is the quality, really?" I know some digital screens have 2160P projectors, but this is IMAX... so what- is it like a 4320P system, or better? Please say it's better. (Fingers crossed)
digital cinema isnt 2160P, it is referred to as 2K. The P stands for progressive, and when you are dealing with high resolutions like that it is assumed. 2K is between 2 million and three million pixels, and it is very good. The next step up is 4K, but it is very difficult to find a theater with that capability. But if you do, it is jawdropping. I had the chance to see Blade Runner on a 4K screen, and no VHS, DVD, or Blu-Ray can come anywhere near that.
I hate paying the prices we do already. On the other hand I loooooove digital! I will pay the extra money, but my visits will be few and far between.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by zebrafetish2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 11:00PM EDT Report Abuse
YES! But, I hope Kodak has some sort of plans to get in bed with the movie industry more in the digital marketplace. They have been one click behind so many times...I hope they make the best of where they currently stand with Hollywood.