Wed May 30, 2007 10:23AM EDT
See Comments (168)
Like everyone else, I watched with interest the demos of Microsoft product managers finger-painting and stretching photos with Surface, the software giant's years-in-the-making, touch-sensitive "computing product." And yes, I derived a certain geeky thrill from it—in fact, it's pretty much (as many observers have mentioned) like watching Tom Cruise manipulate reams of data in mid-air using his fingers in "Minority Report." But just like in that sci-fi movie, Surface looks like a cool technology that we mere mortals won't have in our homes for a long, long time.
Code-named "Milan," Microsoft's Surface project has been in the works for about five years now, and while at first glance it looks like just a thin, touch-sensitive sheet (now that would be cool), in reality it's a full-on Vista PC crammed into a table base with five motion-detecting cameras mounted below the 30-inch display. So no, you're not taking Surface on the bus anytime soon.
Also, in practical terms, these units are simply way too expensive for anything but commercial applications at this point—about $5,000 to $10,000 each, according to the AP. So for the near future, I wouldn’t expect to see Surface, uh, surfacing anywhere except at a few retail and hospitality venues, like T-Mobile (one of Microsoft's first signed customers) and Harrah's, and even then only in a kiosk-type capacity. And as for restaurants? Sure, I enjoyed the demo in which you could flip through the menu on the tabletop, tap your selections, and later divide the bill and calculate the tip—but seriously, how many restaurants will plunk down $5,000 per table so you can look up the info about the wine you're drinking? Not too many, I'd guess (unless the tabletop morphs into a series of gigantic ads, which kind of kills the appetite). And what happens when someone inevitably spills a full glass of ice water on Surface? Oops.
Finally, let's say that Surface does drop in price so that home users can afford one (Microsoft says that'll happen within three to five years). While I like the idea of several people crowding around the screen to grab and resize their own pictures and videos—or to indulge in some groovy digital finger-painting—I can't see a touch-screen mounted in a tabletop being all that useful for everyday applications. When I'm working on Excel spreadsheets, I want that screen upright and facing me, not flat on the table. And as far as I can tell, Microsoft is a long, long ways from producing a flat-screen version of Surface. So as a consumer, Surface might be more of a fun curiosity rather than your day-to-day PC—and $3,000 or even $2,000 is a lot of cash for a curiosity.
Don't get me wrong—I think the technology behind Surface is pretty cool, and I have no doubt that one fine day, we'll have flat screens that you can touch and manipulate just like in "Minority Report." But cool though it is, Surface seems too clunky and expensive to be practical, at least in its current incarnation. Although, come to think of it, I have heard of a new, compact (but still pricey) touch-sensitive device that lets you resize pictures, flip through your music, and do other amazing things with your fingertips—oh right, the Apple iPhone. Hmm...
Related:
Microsoft unveils new Surface computer [AP, via Yahoo! News]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
It's not just Microsoft working on this, there are already more practical displays available, afford ability will follow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-touch
this was boring. you didnt explain anything!
Yet another stupid microsoft idea that is nowhere near finished, way too expensive to consider, and a strain to figure out its use. They need to realize that just because technology allows you to do something, it doesn't automatically make it a great idea. Who cares about a freaking computer coffee table. I have a laptop I can put on my coffee table, and I can even pick it up and put it on my kitchen table. I can even put it in my backpack - bring it to school, and put it on my desk! I can also use it in the bath, on the phone, on the couch, in the chair, etc.. I can't wait until a stationary coffee table with a screen pointing at the ceiling comes along that costs me $5000, that I can't put my mug on, that I'll have to try to invent reasons to have and use it.
I got a good idea. Lets assign people who like Apple stuff to review Apple stuff. Where's the less than thrilling review of the iTV?
You shouldn't smoke pot and read Yahoo! Tech in the same hour; I could have sworn I read an article about Microsoft actually making an innovative, useful product. Wait, what? What do you mean they didn't?
Man everthing is so high tech these days! Wonder what they are gonna invent next.....everybody gonna be wow by it of couse...
Great video here that has very detailed demo done by on10.net: http://on10.net/Blogs/larry/first-look-microsoft-surfacing-computing/
Apple TV.?? Thats like being president, all talk and no brains to back yourself up. Caveman For President!!
you could craft and do this with any old computer, just cut the room out for the moniter in a table and deasign it correctly and have same effect!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sounds similar to the na sayers prior to the proliferation of the PC. The big question back than was " who is going to buy a PC for the home." Wait and see...this will be huge.
If you're interested in this, try out a "SmartBoard" from Smart Tech Technologies. It is a GIGANTIC interactive touch screen that my colleagues and I utililze for teaching children with autism and multiple handicaps- a truly incredible machine!!!
just like everything else that comes along, give it a little while and it won't hurt near as bad in the wallet
Just goes to show that apple can and will do it better than misrosoft ever will.
HEY! APPLE FANS, STOP DECIEVING YOURSELVES. STOP ALL THIS CRITICISING AND COME UP WITH SOMETHING BETTER. AT-LEAST MOCROSOFT IS LOOKING TO THE FUTURE RATHER THAN TRYING TO MAKE BETTER PHONES AND MUSIC PLAYERS. THAT IS WHY MICROSOFT WILL CONTINUE TO MONOPOLIZE THE TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY.
Something else to think about? Why do Hybred cars only get 30 to 40 mpg????? Why don't they get 60 to 70 mpg??? Something fishey around here
----- microsoft always take forever to develop technology that others are already using. LONG LIVE MACS!!!!!!!
People may argue this point but in my opinion Microsoft is getting too big for its britches. First they create a wonderful series of operating systems (Windows 3.x thru Windows XP) that make productivity, creativity and self-expression (through Internet broadcasting, etc.) a reality fot a lot of ordinary people. Then they create Windows Vista which is essentially a piece of garbage that does more to limit the peoples' freedom of expression than anything else. And now they create this gutless wonder of a toutch screen computer and limit the number of people who can create applications for it. I'm sorry, ladied and gentlemen, but in my opinion it looks like Bill Gates and Microsoft are trying to become the monopolistic dictators of the computer world. Now, you can do as you please but, personally, I recommend staying as far away from this thing as is humanly possible.
This will be a great technology for people with limited mobility. I am looking forward to it becoming affordable. Anyone know if someone can be a beta site for this product?
Sounds nice, but it just doesn't seem practical. Just sort of annoying. I perfer the mouse to even the touch pad on a laptop.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 Posted by ocean_kun on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:43PM EDT Report Abuse
pretty expensive but cool nontheless.