Bill would turn the volume down on TV commercials

Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:12PM EDT

See Comments (33)

I'm not that partial to lawmakers meddling with the media, but when it comes to muzzling TV ads that are double the volume of the shows they're sponsoring, I'll make an exception.

Broadcasting & Cable reports that Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) has proposed a bill—the aptly named Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act, or CALM—that would hold the FCC responsible for ensuring that TV commercials "not be excessively noisy."

More precisely, the bill would mandate that the FCC "prescribe a standard to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes than the program material they accompany."

Indeed, loud TV ads are so pervasive that several technologies have cropped up to combat the problem, such as Dolby Volume (which Chris covered last year). The only problem, however, is that these features typically limit the overall dynamic range of the sound, making the whispers too loud and the explosions too soft.

Now, usually I'm suspicious when legislators start circling the media, hoping to score political points by censoring violent movies, video games, or raunchy music lyrics.

But a law regulating noisy TV commercials—the ones that are so loud that you jump for the remote to turn the volume down—well, that's a cause I could get behind.

Related:
Eshoo Calls for CALM in TV Commercials [Broadcast & Cable]

 

Comments on Bill would turn the volume down on TV commercials

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by missannie42 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree with the previous comments. In the meantime, Turn DOWN the volume, get up and do something useful during commercial time.I haven't watched a commercial in years and don't feel deprived at all.

  • 7 Posted by burckerkay on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    america another freedom being taken away are we really free watch out in china they call this communisum. one more freedom being taken

  • 8 Posted by prema.dimauro on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    finally so happy there may be an end to this nerve ending practice

  • 9 Posted by jstroud58 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    why does our congress and rep. spend there time on such trivial things as loudness on tv.why dont they do something that is important to the america people

  • 10 Posted by jlk1959ozks on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    Back in the 1980s, the Reagan Administration sided with the advertisers in the loudness issue and as well with children's advertising. One a mistake, the other, an incalculable mistake. Don't believe me? Look it up.

  • 11 Posted by scholly5554 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is the first proposal that has came up in california since i've lived here [8yrs.] that has made any sence!!

  • 12 Posted by sierrabrulee on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    I find the difference in volume is worse on pay tv (cable) than broadcast. Pay or broadcast, it's definitely worse on certain channels and/or for particular ads. The FCC does have a rule about volume, but that doesn't really do much for those who have cable or sat as the FCC is almost entirely restricted to public airwaves.

  • 13 Posted by mecityslicker@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I feel they should lower the volume, But they should also get rid of the adds about all the diff. pills out there and their side affects. Don't the European stations do commericals during a certain time of day and than leave the rest of the day open for shows commerical free? I am older and I heard of this years ago. If not than maybe that is something they could do here in the USA. Say 2 hours of nothing but commericals, than the other 22 for shows.

  • 14 Posted by idealaudio@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    Please, please, please, let this become a federal law!!! And while they're at it, try to reduce the number of TV commercials from 100,000 an episode to about 20. Commercials should also be required to be as entertaining as the shows we watch...I don't know how they'll figure that out, but loud isn't the answer, EVER, YA HEAR ME!!! Oh sorry, I had the keyboard type on loud.

  • 16 Posted by esitesinc@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's about time loud commercial be classified as public disturbance. And make it 3 counts they're out in California. 25 years to perpetual ban on TV punishment.

  • 17 Posted by burckerkay on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    in china they call this communism in americaits called the law

  • 18 Posted by creamerwc on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Thank heavens somebody is finally doing something about this and I am frankly very sick of scrambling for the remote to mute the tv everytime some outrageously loud commercial is aired. Do they honestly think that someone actually will want to buy their products after being infuriated over the volume level of their commercials? Also, it makes me totally mute them anyways after being blasted with the volume levels.

  • 19 Posted by tiggiepurr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    If only congress would have passed the bill before they went on break....

  • 21 Posted by bobbynelle on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    I would like to support the volume control bill. It is an abuse of the public air waves for broadcasters to up ad volumes---and an assault on our hearing. The unanticipated volume increase soulds like a good class action lawsuit. Bob

  • 22 Posted by bayley_mark_r on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    Whats sad is, I work for a major Cellular Telephone Provider - I won't say which one - and advertisements have made their way into MOVIES! In certain movies, you can clearly see Sprint or AT&T or Verizon or T-Mobile. I want to watch movies without thinking of work! (I work so much I don;t even have cable, but even with my antennae I see these commercials.) My job conbsumes my life enough as it is, but I couldn't watch a MOTION PICTURE without advertisements!

  • 23 Posted by juniors_daddy69 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    THANK GOODNESS I am so sick and tired of this! It has gone on way to long! I thought they passed a bill like this a long time ago! It's so terrible you can't hardly hear the movie or show then it goes to a comercial and you jump out of your seat. It is especially annoying when you are watching tv while others are trying to sleep. I don't know how many times I have been asked to turn the tv down it's to loud. Well it's not my fault that they are intruding on me and everyone else by blaring the stupid commercial that you have probably seen a thousand times already!

  • 25 Posted by hollenjo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm glad to hear I'm not the only who can't stand the loud commercials! You would think the advertising companies and their clients would realize that people find loud commercials so obnoxious that "mute" has become the quick solution. HELLO ADVERTISERS; your tactics are NOT working when the commercials are "TUNED OUT"! The money wasted in TV advertising could be put to much better use!

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.