Wed Sep 3, 2008 2:45PM EDT
See Comments (4)
The town's five TV stations will go all-digital starting Monday, a full six months before the rest of the nation takes the DTV plunge—and the FCC is working hard (maybe too hard, some say) to ensure the test scores a home run.
I've blogged before about cities that are conducting simulated dry-runs for the impending analog TV signal shutdown, but next week, Wilmington will do the real thing—its five local TV channels will switch to digital-only broadcasting, and antenna-only households without a digital TV will go dark.
But as the L.A. Times reports, the FCC, which has a lot riding on next week's test, seems determined to make sure no one gets caught by surprise.
Indeed, about a dozen FCC officials have spent the past four months fanning out across Wilmington, making sure that anyone who gets their TV signals over an antenna knows how to deal with the looming DTV transition, according to the Times.
However, the story also notes that some consumer advocacy groups—including Consumer Reports publisher Consumers Union—complain that the FCC is stacking the deck with the Wilmington test.
For example, most TV markets will only get a handful of FCC staffers visiting for just a few days, compared to the dozen or so FCC'ers who've been scouring Wilmington almost the entire summer (including personal visits from FCC Chairman Kevin Martin himself). Also, only about 8 percent of Wilmington's viewers rely on a TV antenna, versus 12 percent for the rest of the country, the Times reports.
Overall, however, I think a DTV test run is a smart move. FCC commissioners have also promised that they won't just kick back and relax if the Wilmington DTV test is a success, and that they'll apply any lessons learned before the big day: February 17, 2009. Let's hope so.
In any case, I'll report back next week on how Wilmington's DTV test run went—and while I'm on the subject, you're all set for the switch, right? Click here for a DTV transition refresher.
Related:
Wilmington, N.C., ready for switch to digital TV [Los Angeles Times]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
how about THE WII
WII came out in 2006
Finally, not corp payed and not bias review seen on yahoo. Thanks!
Ok, it's interesting how these items made the Top 10 list but also almost every one has a list of caveats right along with it.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by carolsky9 on Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:52PM EST Report Abuse
I like all of your suggestions. I'm partial to the VUDU box since I've beta tested it for about 6 months now. There have been about 30 reviews that I have read (they're on the vudu web site) and yours is the only one which indicated it might have less than DVD quality. I respectfully suggest you check it again. It's 1080p, plays HD movies very well, and generally has a wow factor for sharpness and interface. The prime thing they offer is much more quantity and quality than the cable companies or Apple, which has only 500 vs 5000 for VUDU now and another 500 oiver the next 6 months. You can filter for about 25 different genres, such as drama, romance, documentaries, or combinations of different groups. You also can ask it to find all of the movies from a particular actor or directot, etc. Guys seem more focussed on the techie aspect of a big screen. I think women buyers are much more focussed on good content, which I think is good sense, and which is where I find VUDU is so good.