Wed Sep 3, 2008 2:45PM EDT
See Comments (4)
The town's five TV stations will go all-digital starting Monday, a full six months before the rest of the nation takes the DTV plunge—and the FCC is working hard (maybe too hard, some say) to ensure the test scores a home run.
I've blogged before about cities that are conducting simulated dry-runs for the impending analog TV signal shutdown, but next week, Wilmington will do the real thing—its five local TV channels will switch to digital-only broadcasting, and antenna-only households without a digital TV will go dark.
But as the L.A. Times reports, the FCC, which has a lot riding on next week's test, seems determined to make sure no one gets caught by surprise.
Indeed, about a dozen FCC officials have spent the past four months fanning out across Wilmington, making sure that anyone who gets their TV signals over an antenna knows how to deal with the looming DTV transition, according to the Times.
However, the story also notes that some consumer advocacy groups—including Consumer Reports publisher Consumers Union—complain that the FCC is stacking the deck with the Wilmington test.
For example, most TV markets will only get a handful of FCC staffers visiting for just a few days, compared to the dozen or so FCC'ers who've been scouring Wilmington almost the entire summer (including personal visits from FCC Chairman Kevin Martin himself). Also, only about 8 percent of Wilmington's viewers rely on a TV antenna, versus 12 percent for the rest of the country, the Times reports.
Overall, however, I think a DTV test run is a smart move. FCC commissioners have also promised that they won't just kick back and relax if the Wilmington DTV test is a success, and that they'll apply any lessons learned before the big day: February 17, 2009. Let's hope so.
In any case, I'll report back next week on how Wilmington's DTV test run went—and while I'm on the subject, you're all set for the switch, right? Click here for a DTV transition refresher.
Related:
Wilmington, N.C., ready for switch to digital TV [Los Angeles Times]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
i am having the same problem -- i have spent over $400 and get less (only 1 channel) with digital.
Will tropical storm Hanna be a factor?
I will be watching this test with great interest. Here in Washington, DC I have found the digital signals extremely quirky and unreliable compared to analog. No matter how many FCC officials come to town, this is not likely to change unless steps are taken either to upgrade the quality and strength of digital signals, or to delay and re-evaluate the decision to terminate the good old reliable analog TV signals.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by christopher_alvares on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:25PM EDT Report Abuse
I still get my TV over the air. I recently bought a convertor box. Before, I was getting 7 channels and although they had some static, I could watch them. Now, with digital TV, I get 2 channels and 1 of them drops the signal frequently. I blew more money on an amplifier and got one more occasional channel. I'm still trying to get this fabulous performance you read about, but so far, I am not impressed.