Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:22AM EDT
See Comments (163)
That’s the question that Senator Herb Kohl, chairman of the Senate's antitrust panel, is asking the four big U.S. cell carriers—and SMS rates have, indeed, doubled since 2005. What gives?
In a letter to AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless execs, Kohl wrote that text messages still have the same length restriction—160 characters—as they did in 2005. If that's the case, Kohl asks, why do the big four carriers now charge 20 cents per message, compared to 10 cents just a few years ago (this according to InternetNews)?
Maybe because mergers and acquisitions—witness Sprint-Nextel, Verizon-Alltel, and AT&T-BellSouth—have led to less and less competition, Kohl said.
"I am concerned with whether this consolidation and increased market power by the major carriers has contributed to this doubling of text-messaging rates over the last three years," wrote Kohl, who gave the carriers a month to justify their higher SMS rates.
So, how are the big carriers responding? Verizon Wiireless CEO Lowell McAdam told Bloomberg (via the Calgary Herald) that the average price of a U.S. text message has actually "plummeted" in the past few years—that is, if you consider SMS messages bundled with a rate plan.
But then again, that's their whole strategy, isn't it? Boost prices on individual messages to push users toward SMS bundles, which means guaranteed monthly revenue for the big four.
Meanwhile, higher prices or not, U.S. cell users have gone SMS crazy in the past 12 months.
According to the latest numbers from CTIA (the organization that represents the wireless industry), U.S. texters sent 2.5 billion SMS messages in June—each day, mind you, or 78 billion messages for the month.
That's a staggering 160-percent increase over last year, the CTIA reports—as well as a lot of money for the carriers, who collectively raked in $14.8 billion in wireless data revenue in the first half of 2008.
So, what do you think: Are the big four carriers trying to gouge us with text messaging? Would you dump your bundled texting plan if individual messages were more affordable?
Related:
Sen. Kohl: Why Does Texting Cost So Much? [InternetNews]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I hate Text messaging to begin with so maybe I'm not the usual but if they were less expensive I'd be more inclined to use them. 20 cents per message? Please. I have no need to buy the plans which are about 5 dollars for a couple hundred messages or 15 dollars for unlimited. I average MAYBE 2-3 messages per month right now. Plus, I have an unlimited data plan for email and internet and feel that should include text. Even when texting hundreds of messages (as some of my friends do), amouts to very little actual data compared to everything else phones are capable of using. Whereas sending and recieving emial daily (which I do) takes much, MUCH more.
to #1. You're right! We need to drill more oil and text message, gas and stuffed animal rates will all decrease!
Doubled, they use to be FREE with Sprint!!!!.
It won't matter anyway! Our oil producing companies will soon have us by the $%# once they've bought an interest in the telcom companies...it's just a matter of time! In reality, I don't think we have a chance at reducing SMS rates, even with renewable energy!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by nathan38701 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:34PM EDT Report Abuse
Because of Oil! Oil is so much more and we all know you need oii to send a SMS.