Mon Oct 6, 2008 3:12PM EDT
See Comments (101)
The new, chip-embedded car keys will also keep young drivers from cranking the car stereo, as well as sound alarms until seat belts get fastened. Looks like the carefree days of "American Graffiti" are over, in more ways than one.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
This is laughable. The chance that young drivers wont immediately learn to circumvent this safety feature is nill. How well did seat belt "dingers" last? about as long as it took to cut the wire.
Sounds like a good idea. I know that teenagers may be able to find a way around this but if my kid were to somehow modify or cut the wires in MY vehicle (even though he/she is the driver) that would be the last time they drove MY vehicle. Any reservations about the speed thing are idiotic. When do you ever need to go above 80 or say 85? Besides, if you knew that was the limit, then you would avoice situations where you could potentially go faster then that. Remember people, we're talking a restrictive key for your teenage driver, not you.
all features seem good to help with saftey but how will this affect the consumer in the after market plan of up grading their audio system . or will this just cause you to spend more for that navigation system the factory offers, than buying for a lower price at your local stereo shop because the system will not intergrate.
this is totally cool. Acceleration and speed are 2 different things. you can accelerate at a high speed to get away, but once you hit 80 you've left the danger in the dust. And blasting the radio thing...also cool. what's wrong with teaching safety. you make your kids brush their teeth cuz it's safe/healthy/prophylactic. Why not take that idea to other aspects in life?
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by middlenamefrank on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:19PM EDT Report Abuse
I think the phrase "necessary evil" might apply here. Nobody likes restricting freedoms, but we do sometimes (like motorcycle helmet laws and car seatbelt laws) because we have to acknowledge the safety threat. And if it's just a governor that only limits top speed, the full acceleration of the vehicle should be available to avoid threats. There shouldn't be any need for speeds above 80 mph ever.