Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:18AM EST
See Comments (213)
At last, the music industry admits what we've known for years: That filing music-swapping lawsuits against teenagers, little old ladies, and corpses is a fool's errand (not to mention an expensive headache for the defendants). But don't worry—the RIAA has something new up its sleeves.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
As a pirate, I can earnestly say that this will only lead to escalation. We'll encrypt our traffic. True, it slows us down, but we can't be stopped. We're a virus.
Also a very valid point dgd_mail. This is still America, Jack and I'll be dipped if I let some fascist conglomerate tell me what I can and cannot do, while they sit in their Ivory towers!!!
Most of the people I know who download music do so because CDs are too expensive. CD sales could also be sliding because of people who decide to go to half-price book stores, or other local music stores who sell CDs for an average of 7 or 8 dollars. So lowering CD prices overall might at least help CD sales. I still don't think people should stop downloading though. And if anyone figures out which ISP service providers are doing this, they should share that info.
Next they will be wanting to sue people who get TV "free- over the air". Oh, they already do that in socialistic Europe. I don't pay for movies, music, or TV and u can't make me! Most media is true garbage and redone from someone elses work. I am just "perusing" the media, and will not pay for poor-talent garbage. BTW - peruse - means "to not use" in a sense. Weed out the 98% of crap and only pay for the good stuff. I won't even download metallica! yuch! Get a clue RIAA or your offices will we ransacked in the next social uprising (and they are coming!)
Why all the contempt for the artists? What, did half you guys get dumped for guitarists and drummers in high school? Grow up. Look, if you think most of the CDs released by major labels are crap (and you're right) nobody is forcing you buy them. If you think they're too expensive, don't buy them. But if you like and value what an artist does, pay for it. Simple. The RIAA has NOTHING to do with artists, and if some of you loudmouths went to the RIAA website, you'd actually learn that its "members are the record companies" not the artists. In this discussion so far, it's you misinformed "consumers" and not the artists who have entitlement issues.
The record companies need to die off, find something else to do. The recording artist, if they want to make any money, should also go. The Music of an artist, if they want to grow in popularity, should be free (face it, already is) and the artist should focus on live performances to make an income. Now that it’s all digital, people will always find away to give a song to friend. Some recording artist & labels make millions and millions. Let them earn it by going on the road.
Fine - I won't go to P2P sites then. I'll just rip everything I want from music radio, which actually plays the songs I *WANT* to hear, instead of the crap they load on a CD with one or two good songs. The RIAA keeps pooping in their own shoes and then wonders why they feel so squishy. It's funny.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
206 Posted by chris_m_pk on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:25PM EDT Report Abuse
54, if you give a CD to someone to listen to that is perfectly legal, but if you are both in different places listening to it at the same time then that is against the license agreement.