RIAA to halt lawsuits, cozy up to ISPs instead

Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:18AM EST

See Comments (213)

At last, the music industry admits what we've known for years: That filing music-swapping lawsuits against teenagers, little old ladies, and corpses is a fool's errand (not to mention an expensive headache for the defendants). But don't worry—the RIAA has something new up its sleeves.

The new strategy (as reported by the Wall Street Journal): If the music industry finds out that you're swapping music files online, it'll send an e-mail to your ISP (agreements have already hashed out agreements with "some" unnamed service providers, apparently), which will in turn forward the message to you—probably with a little "P.S." asking you to stop. [Update: CNET has a copy of the RIAA's form letter to ISPs.]

If you don't stop, well ... your service provider probably won't sue you, but it might slow down your broadband connection, or cut off your service altogether.

So, why has the RIAA changed the play? Well, maybe it's been looking at reports like this one from the NPD Group, which shows that U.S. CD sales continue to slide, while the number of tunes shared via P2P sites continues to increase, despite all the litigation.

And then there's the disastrous headlines, as the RIAA relentlessly tracked down and sued tens of thousands of alleged music pirates. Among them: Kids, octogenarians, and a few dead people.

Reaction to the news? Mixed. Engadget's headline reads (in part): "RIAA finds its soul," with the story noting that while the RIAA reserves the right to go after "heavy uploaders or repeat offenders ... it appears that single mothers are in the clear."

All Things Digital has a darker outlook, speculating that ISPs—which "care about the cost of moving lots of data around … [and] want to make money by selling, renting, or just offering up Hollywood's movies and TV shows to subscribers"—might be more than content to "cut off file-sharers … [or] simply [charge] heavy file-sharers a lot of money."

And here's another possibility, courtesy of yours truly: Say your ISP catches you sharing tunes via P2P. No problem—download away! But when you get your next cable bill, you'll find the itemized songs added to your monthly charge, kind of like an iTunes bill.

Call it the "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" strategy.

P.S. Make no mistake—just because the RIAA has stopped filing new music-swapping lawsuits doesn't mean that it's dropped the existing ones, according to the Journal. Quite the contrary.

Related:
Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits [Wall Street Journal]

Comments on RIAA to halt lawsuits, cozy up to ISPs instead

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by vr6swp on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    Major label record companies have nobody to blame but themselves. Albums aren't selling because they're not putting out anything worth buying. Nobody wants to pay fifteen to twenty bucks for a CD that might have one good track on it, when they can download the song for 99 cents, or get it for free off a file-sharing site. The artists themselves aren't hurt because only a very few make money off album sales anyway, the rest have to tour their asses off, trying make a living playing shows.

  • 27 Posted by fender_stratplayer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    Post 8 "True artists will continue to make good music?" And do what for food and shelter? They will sell concert tickets. There are still enough people to buy CDs. Radio Stations will buy them and play them to give exposure. They make their money at the concerts.

  • 28 Posted by muscleman20002002 on Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:52PM EST Report Abuse

    Even though I don't give a danm about music downloading, but this is ridiculous, and there is no way in heck the isp will cut your internet, because you are freaking paying, and those greedy ----- ers need to give people a break, or people can decide not to buy them at all, matter of fact those people who pirate were going to buy the danm cd anyways, it's there it's free and they just downloaded.

  • 29 Posted by geoffkmitt on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well all these people talking about stealing music hurts the artist.Total load.The only people who make actually money are the record company's. Plus if ISPs start charging people they will just cut out and go to a new provider. So all these companys now have no people on there plans a a whole bunch cutting out of the bill so there broke to boot. Man people are dumb...like to a point to be put on a island to rot

  • 30 Posted by baldylocks1976 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    "You like the music, show some respect and pay the artist for it." I buy concert tickets and T-shirts.

  • 31 Posted by digi.girl on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    They do realize there a lot of ways around this, for example Change your ISP go somewhere and get wi-fi use friend's computers it's kind of an empty threat.

  • 32 Posted by tguns_420 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    The cost of making cd's have gone down substantially since their invention, but the price to purchase a cd has gone up....a lot. If a cd cost $5.00' like it should, we would download less music. Musicians make a ton of money when they tour.

  • 33 Posted by supadcy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    Just walk into any "real" music store, grab whatever cd's you like and run. It's been so long since they've seen that happen they will just stand and look at each other like, "Did that just happen?". Hello 1985.

  • 34 Posted by scd500 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    uh, what am I missing here. everyone is complaining about "the man" taking away their rights to download (take) music. regardless of who takes from who it is still STEALING. if you are gonna take it at least be man enuf to admit you are stealing instead of blaming everyone else

  • 35 Posted by scd500 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    too many people in this country are just too sef-centered and clueless as to how good they have it. and they blame everyone and everything else for their misfortune. WHA! WHA! Grow up or get out!

  • 36 Posted by dnguyen325 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    I understand that artists need to make a living, but isn't thats what touring, concerts, and playing live is for? Being able access their music easily spreads their name and bring more people to their live shows. Those corporations just want to pad their pockets and overprofit on something we all love which is music. Thats the problem in our society, everyone just wants to overprofit by creating restrictions instead of satisfying their customers and providing flexibility.

  • 37 Posted by chantel9999 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    lets be truthful, if they would quit thinking there music cd's are worth there wight in gold, people wouldn't be downloading in the first place. music companies have been overcharging us for years. they have made more than enough money off the public and downloading is the best way to protest it !!

  • 38 Posted by jagsvsgators on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    its kinda like car companies saying. if you make your own car and use our design. we sue you. nobody cares if you make your own corvette. that is downloading music. for sharing its like saying. you cant go buy a camaro and give it to your friend or we will sue your friend!!

  • 39 Posted by inboardshooter on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    The big three car makers are going out of business, $h1+ happens. When air-freight came, railroads were done. The internet is here the RIAA is done. I have no problem "stealing" music, technically not stealing, but I'm in college drowning in debt, they live in "hill top houses driving 15 cars", I don't feel bad for them.

  • 40 Posted by echoip on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is rediculous, look how competitive the ISP market is. There is no way an ISP is going to cut off or even risk alienating a consumer. Too many other ISP options are available. The music industry is throwing in the towel on lawsuits and disguising it by trying to make us believe this is their new strategy.

  • 41 Posted by nbibrka on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    In response to movietext, I'm sure that more than enough morons will still buy music, thus providing recording artists PLENTY of money for food and shelter. Those artists make way too much money as it is, they can live without their Lamborghinis.

  • 42 Posted by blaquejacqueshellaque on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    A technological solution just won't work. Writing a proprietary encryt-compress/decryption algorithm is so easy that some hacker will do it to technologically enable P2P sharing by confusing a filter program. At first zipping might do the job. RIAA and the ISP couldn't tell the difference between piracy and a letter to grandma. Let CD sales die. Online downloads (with copy protection) are the future. Simply offer content downloads at reasonable prices. DVDs have copy protection. Hackers can break it, but most people, those who are basically honest, keep buying and renting DVDs because prices are not outrageous. When music prices are reasonable, most people won't even attempt to pirate songs. That's the real answer. Jim

  • 43 Posted by kingofspeed46 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    There is no way to block off internet use, and it is an invasion of privacy. Whoever said that th record companies are the only ones making money are wrong. Artists don't just give their work away. They sell it. Duh. And if people stop buying CD's, then record companies don't buy as many tracks. Authors don't make as much money, and less music is is around. I think downloading is okay if the author allows it. Like Wierd Al's "Don't Download this Song". He allows people to download it on websites like Cnet and downloads.com (or whatever it is).

  • 44 Posted by catwolf2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    I watch MTV cribs, these artists aren't struggling too much. Also, if they lower the cost of a CD to $2 each, then maybe people will say it's not worth it to download it and go buy it. Finally, I am tired of RIAA talking tough. When the next big artist releases an anticipated album, the downloaders should band together and buy exactly 1 copy, then share it.

  • 45 Posted by eury2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    LOL ok for the people saying what would the music artists and music company's do for food and shelter ok for 1: artists are millionaires get is they have so much money they buy big ass houses and everything they want and will never go without food or shelter for the rest of their lives and their kids lives 2: music company's are almost multi billionaires so these company's / artists will never ever go without they have so much money they are set for the rest of their lives rich people just like to complain how broke they are when their bank accounts have 6 figures instead of 7

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.