Wed Jan 7, 2009 5:01PM EST
See Comments (5)
Yeah, it's a bit of a head-scratcher, but if a super-slim, wall-mountable Blu-ray player is what you've always wanted, Samsung's got your number.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
That ugly ass Samsung font ruins it.
Blu-ray is so yesterday. If they didn't just pu----- just for HD movies, I may have been interested. You watch a movie once, it goes in a cabinet for 20 years. Some people, like myself, never wanted it for that, but for archiving info, MP3s or lower def movies. My PC won't write to Blu-ray, so I don't want Blu-ray. I'll wait for next-gen. Their use for Blu-ray is so one-dimensional; Hi-def movies. I never bought DVDs for pre-recorded movies, either, but I did write to blank DVD media.
If they put the Samsung logo at the bottom left of the player, I'd like it a lot more. It stands out too much. Looks fantastic though.
the only way i would jump to blue-ray would be if obama would offer one instead of a stimulus check.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by doug_isaacson on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:47PM EDT Report Abuse
"Of course, the key issue here is price"... Unfortunately not, the key issue is whether or not it supports all the claimed specs out of the box! Still waiting for DTS-HD MA decoding promised at CES 2007 by Samsung for the BD-UP5000 and BD-P1400.