DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:42AM EST

See Comments (300)

Obama's transition team and Democratic lawmakers want to push back the analog TV shutoff date by as much as 90 days, while the FCC warns that such a move would only make matters worse. My view: It's time to rip off the Band-Aid.

First of all, here's the latest: Pointing to recent reports that federal funding for DTV converter box coupons has run out (well, for now, at least), Obama's camp is calling for a delay in the February 17 DTV transition date, while Senate Democrat Jay Rockefeller is reportedly prepping legislation that would push the date back 90 days.

Current FCC Chairman Kevin Martin counters that delaying the analog TV shutoff date would only add to viewer confusion, and he proposes a couple of alternatives: Either a new infusion of funding from Congress for the coupon program, or eliminating the 90-day expiration date for coupons that have yet to be redeemed.

So, what to do? After all, the Feb. 17 deadline is barely a month away.

Personally, I say we stick with the deadline. But why, if so many people are still unprepared? Based on evidence from the various DTV tests conducted in the past several months, it's not lack of awareness that's the problem—rather, it's viewers who are "either procrastinating," "in denial" (as one observer put it), or suffering from "technical naiveté" (from this spot-on L.A. Times editorial).

As far as "technical naiveté" goes, that's perfectly understandable—and that's why there are phone banks ready to answer questions, and as the L.A. Times notes, the FCC recently doled out $8 million in grant money for volunteer community outreach.

But while I've yet to run into anyone who's totally ignorant of the coming transition, I've met plenty of viewers who fall into the "in denial" category—and for them, nothing short of seeing their old TVs go dark will snap them into reality.

One more factoid: According to this New York Times story, about 6.8 percent of U.S. households aren't ready for the DTV transition—meaning that 93.2 percent are ready. (Remember, only those with older analog TVs and over-the-air antennas will be affected; if you've got a TV with a digital tuner, or you're getting your signals over cable or satellite, you're all set.)

That said, Congress needs to step up and approve more money for the converter-box coupon program, enough so that the million-plus names on their waiting list can get their coupons in a timely (key word: timely) manner—as in days, not weeks.

No, the DTV transition won't be fun—or easy. But as many others have pointed out, it'll be a painful process no matter when we do it, and the sooner we get started (and we've been working on this thing for 10 years now), the sooner we can use the newly available spectrum for next-generation wireless networks—4G, to be specific—that'll benefit all of us.

So, what do you think: To delay, or not to delay?

Related:
What you need to know about the DTV transition [Yahoo! Tech]

Comments on DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by mtrogers2001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    The government shouldnt be forcing people to get better more expensive tv's or a device for their old ones because some yahoo thinks the picture is slightly better. TV stations should broadcast in analog and digital like they have for several years now and stop worrying about it. If people want HD than they will pay for it.

  • 27 Posted by gmshuford on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    They have been talking about the digital changeover as far back as 2002 when I bought my first digital TV. Why should the rest of us suffer because some individuals are still living in the Stone Age. The 7% of the population this will affect should not hold the 93% back.

  • 28 Posted by jacksmar on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    If you don't understand Linear Interpolation, then you don't have an opinion valid or invalid.

  • 29 Posted by youngun22a on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    No delay,let get this over with.. The sooner the better.

  • 30 Posted by crazybob2525 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    The FCC pulled the pin on this hand grenade a long time ago. It's time to throw it, and throw it hard. TV is bad enough without dealing with crappy analog transmissions.

  • 31 Posted by leonardo10_99 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    My suggestion would be to NOT delay the transition at all. That would cause major confusion and cost more money. If it affects anyone, the percentage would be very minor. THE SOLUTION? What they need to do is instead of having those dumb rebate cards, why don't they have people buy the converters and have them fill out a rebate form from the store and send it in with their "original receipt" and UPC from the box to get their rebate (if A. It is bought after a certain date and B. No rebate was already given off that receipt). Thats how smart companies do it. Why didn't the government do it this way in the first place?

  • 32 Posted by sarakalinin on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    Both my parents are senior citizens and confused by the whole thing of DTV. Don't know how they got their coupons since neither own a computer. They both HAD coupons at one point, but let them expire. First, they didn't think they would expire. Secondly, they were confused by the whole thing. By the time I got involved it was too late. I tried to get them new coupons, but I was told they had already applied, blah, blah. Guess who has to buy them their DTV boxes -- groan.

  • 33 Posted by lcw1701d on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    Just leave one analog channel after transition (say channel 2) and have a loop of the Digital convertion commercial playing 24/7 for a year.

  • 34 Posted by jbwingman on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Do it as scheduled! 90+ percent of those without service will be on board within a month. Afterall, heroin addicts do need their fix! The up to $40 coupon system was a bad idea to begin with. Idea 1: BUY THE DARN BOX, SUBMIT YOUR RECEIPT AND PROOF OF PURCHASE (up to 2?) WITH YOUR TAX RETURN FOR $40ea TAX CREDIT. Idea 2: Retailers deduct up to $40 from sell price and submit documentation (monthly/quarterly) to feds for direct reimbursement. This is not rocket science, America. Let's do it! Yes, we

  • 35 Posted by juzztin7 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    No more delays, just do it already.. TV is a luxury, not a right..

  • 36 Posted by brett7180 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    stringstrumbeat...why are you looking here for those answers? I'm sure there are better sources out there than some comments on an article. "Who approved this expenditure?" Lets think for a second....PROBABLY CONGRESS!! And the reason is to offer a better quality picture and sound. More channels for free and it will also free up those signal bands previously used by tv for use by new technology.

  • 37 Posted by deborah_mpls on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    MOST people didn't realize that the freakin $40.00 coupons had ANY expiration date & mine had not a 90 but a 60 day expiration! If they assume that all coupons not already redeemed - won't be, and issue them to the influx of requests now waiting - you'd please SOME people. Me? I got screwed! I was waitin til after Christmas, being a single mom. Now my two allowable coupons per household have expired and are useless.

  • 38 Posted by down2haskell on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    They've made this so much harder than it needs to be. Help lines, town hall meetings, commercials every 5 minutes for the past year -- are you kidding me? The country has been given enough opportunity to get their little boxes -- just make the change. Futhermore, it's ridiculous that the government is even paying for this; it's tv for Pete's sake. People can't afford health care, food and oil, but we'll use tax dollars to make sure they still have their tv? C'mon.

  • 39 Posted by county_cop on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    The same idiots who haven't paid attention the last few years will not pay attention no matter how many delays there are. The is the same mentality as the public schools: Drag the larger group down to the level of the least intelligent among us. No wonder kids graduate without being able to read. These kids grow up and ignore the media blitz about the conversion to DTV. Now is the time to switch. For God's sake the worse that will happen is they will miss lame network TV..

  • 40 Posted by dropkick1369 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    I hooked up the converter. Very easy to do. But I lost most of my channels, and that's with a power antenna. I did get everything but NBC, now down to just 2. They need to boost the signal.

  • 41 Posted by wesjxn on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    Think of this, a lot of the TV stations aren't prepared either, about half of the local stations here aren't broadcasting in HD yet.

  • 42 Posted by xoticscene on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    pushing back the tv converter date is such a non issue...obark is scaring me

  • 43 Posted by southern_impressions on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    Please just do it! I'm so tired of the wait, if people aren't ready it's their own fault. They have had over a year to get ready. When the switch is made they'll figure it out and maybe get motivated to get the converter box.

  • 44 Posted by creasman00 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    Good grief! It's just TV. If their set goes dark, maybe they'll actually venture out of their dark caves and experience the real world. Perhaps they could read the paper, or even, dare I say it, a BOOK! Take the blue pill! Reality isn't just on TV.

  • 45 Posted by dpn40 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is just like the government. One screw up over another. Let's see how long they can stretch this program out, and how much of my tax dollars they can spend doing it. So far 12,000.00 has gone to the government and that is before April 15 when they will tell me I owe more. If they did not take so much money away for the working class maybe we could help someone who need a DTV for 300.00 bucks. It is too bad we can't tell the GOVERNMENT to Kiss our BUTTS

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.