DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:42AM EST

See Comments (300)

Obama's transition team and Democratic lawmakers want to push back the analog TV shutoff date by as much as 90 days, while the FCC warns that such a move would only make matters worse. My view: It's time to rip off the Band-Aid.

First of all, here's the latest: Pointing to recent reports that federal funding for DTV converter box coupons has run out (well, for now, at least), Obama's camp is calling for a delay in the February 17 DTV transition date, while Senate Democrat Jay Rockefeller is reportedly prepping legislation that would push the date back 90 days.

Current FCC Chairman Kevin Martin counters that delaying the analog TV shutoff date would only add to viewer confusion, and he proposes a couple of alternatives: Either a new infusion of funding from Congress for the coupon program, or eliminating the 90-day expiration date for coupons that have yet to be redeemed.

So, what to do? After all, the Feb. 17 deadline is barely a month away.

Personally, I say we stick with the deadline. But why, if so many people are still unprepared? Based on evidence from the various DTV tests conducted in the past several months, it's not lack of awareness that's the problem—rather, it's viewers who are "either procrastinating," "in denial" (as one observer put it), or suffering from "technical naiveté" (from this spot-on L.A. Times editorial).

As far as "technical naiveté" goes, that's perfectly understandable—and that's why there are phone banks ready to answer questions, and as the L.A. Times notes, the FCC recently doled out $8 million in grant money for volunteer community outreach.

But while I've yet to run into anyone who's totally ignorant of the coming transition, I've met plenty of viewers who fall into the "in denial" category—and for them, nothing short of seeing their old TVs go dark will snap them into reality.

One more factoid: According to this New York Times story, about 6.8 percent of U.S. households aren't ready for the DTV transition—meaning that 93.2 percent are ready. (Remember, only those with older analog TVs and over-the-air antennas will be affected; if you've got a TV with a digital tuner, or you're getting your signals over cable or satellite, you're all set.)

That said, Congress needs to step up and approve more money for the converter-box coupon program, enough so that the million-plus names on their waiting list can get their coupons in a timely (key word: timely) manner—as in days, not weeks.

No, the DTV transition won't be fun—or easy. But as many others have pointed out, it'll be a painful process no matter when we do it, and the sooner we get started (and we've been working on this thing for 10 years now), the sooner we can use the newly available spectrum for next-generation wireless networks—4G, to be specific—that'll benefit all of us.

So, what do you think: To delay, or not to delay?

Related:
What you need to know about the DTV transition [Yahoo! Tech]

Comments on DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 286 Posted by bobs1937 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    The same idiots who have had over a year to get ready and haven't still won't be ready even if you give them another 10 years to prepare. Just do it and that will force them to get it done.

  • 287 Posted by tleday03 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    We should be thinking more of others. For instance: aunts and uncles, grandparents, those less fortunate. I know plenty of older people who are not ready for this event to take place. It's not that they don't want to be...more that it costs money they are unprepared t0 spend. Have you checked out the economy, lately. Yes, we have been changing from analog for years now and up to this point there was barely any credibility to it. Now it's really happening and most of us are caught short. So what if you're ready or not. As a matter of fact, that's great! Now just wait for everyone else. It doesn't cost you anymore than you've already paid.

  • 288 Posted by tnpnldy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    Do not delay. We have known this was coming for a very long time. If delayed - I can assure you the people that have so far done nothing - will continue to do nothing. This change is long overdue - don't delay it.

  • 289 Posted by gtortarolo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    Enough all ready!! This has been going on for years. If someone is dumb enough to have missed it, they are too dumb to even watch TV. Why are tax payers paying a billion + to subsidize peoples' entertainment?? Its only a tiny fraction of the US anyway 6MM out of 300MM works out to 2% of the poulation.

  • 290 Posted by frontierout@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    I had to admit it but I'm nearly 70 and I don't have a clue what digital tv is. I do have satalite so I'm assuming from what I've heard I won't need a box. I'm a procrastanator (sp) and no matter how many delays people like me will never be ready for anything. I'm not proud of this I've just finally over the years admitted that's what I am.

  • 291 Posted by cdbd3rd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    People have had what, 2 years(?) to get ready for this. Anyone that hasn't gotten ready by now is not going to be helped by another 4-6 months.

  • 292 Posted by sroberts127@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    The same people who aren't ready now won't be ready in 90 days. I wasn't aware that it is the govt's responsibility to make sure everyone has TV after antiquated systems have been appropriately phased out. I suppose that when new emission controls are mandated on all autos, the govt. will pay for that conversion as well.

  • 293 Posted by sawman2_2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    Lets do it. doesn't matter if we prolong it ot not they still won't be ready for it

  • 294 Posted by janjonsum on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    Washington should have let it go on 17th. Viewers have had plenty of time so why should we wait on few who have done nothing yet? Some stations are going ahead and I applaud them for doing so. Maybe those who sat on backsides eating bon-bon's will understand next time, 17th means 17th. But, Washington caved in, as they will continue to do no matter who is in white house.

  • 295 Posted by kare2much on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree, please don't delay it anymore. Actually where I live, most of our television stations are not going to delay. They are in the process of changing over and the finishing touches on Digital take effect Feb 17th. I am so tired of the commercials. Let's be done with it.

  • 296 Posted by czbluebird on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    Everyone who has a TV has been told LONG AGO that the digital transition is coming on the set date.If they have not gotton ready by now it is their own fault. Some peope will NEVER be ready on time for ANYTHING.When their TV goes blank, they will figger out a way,& if not,,SO WHAT? I grew up in a home with no TV because my father pegged that as a ridiculous time waster. WE lived on a dairy farm & had so much to do that there was no time to be looking at others on a TV.Fotunately my father taught me that learning to work & create was more important than watching comedians.I feel very lucky to have learned that TV is NOT a necessity.Do the change & let the super slow ones behind.They maybe like it there.

  • 297 Posted by mdesch74@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    We have know for how long that this was coming? Come on people. Switch it over and when those people don't have any TV they will run right out and get a converter box. I'm sick of nothing getting done in this country all the way down to the simplest thing like getting digital TV. Those that don't have a converter box probably say they can't afford it, but I bet you those are the same people that pay $5 for a pack of cigarettes and make sure that they have enough liquor in their house. IDIOTS!

  • 298 Posted by judithgossinger on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think its good that they delay the dtv becase there somany who are not ready for it. I think they shoud delay it till 2012 because comes june 12th there are still gong to be alot that are not going to be ready for dtv.

  • 299 Posted by sam52054 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    They're supposed to make TRILLIONS back back auctioning off the analog spectrum........it's time to stop the crap, just because a few members of the trailer tribe are too stupid to apply for a coupon and get it so they can have their Obama fix for the night. 1)They work (the boxes) 2) You CAN get the coupons (I did, only to find out my old HDTV with an analog tuner can't get HD with the ones the gov is providing) Smart government, Right. 3)Millions of $ and ENERGY is being WASTED by TV stations having to power BOTH Analog and Spectrum. 4)Broadcasters, SHUT IT OFF NOW! Don't wait. You have the right and the common sense (if not cents).

  • 300 Posted by a78aej on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    TRANSITION NOW! Procrastinators will survive a few days without TV. And if you can't get the coupons, the boxes only cost around 60 dollars. Either buy a box or a small new tv! You can take the converter box coupons in with the receipt and get a refund when they do come in! We outright bought our first converter box.

More Posts: First Prev 14 15 16 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.