DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:42AM EST

See Comments (300)

Obama's transition team and Democratic lawmakers want to push back the analog TV shutoff date by as much as 90 days, while the FCC warns that such a move would only make matters worse. My view: It's time to rip off the Band-Aid.

First of all, here's the latest: Pointing to recent reports that federal funding for DTV converter box coupons has run out (well, for now, at least), Obama's camp is calling for a delay in the February 17 DTV transition date, while Senate Democrat Jay Rockefeller is reportedly prepping legislation that would push the date back 90 days.

Current FCC Chairman Kevin Martin counters that delaying the analog TV shutoff date would only add to viewer confusion, and he proposes a couple of alternatives: Either a new infusion of funding from Congress for the coupon program, or eliminating the 90-day expiration date for coupons that have yet to be redeemed.

So, what to do? After all, the Feb. 17 deadline is barely a month away.

Personally, I say we stick with the deadline. But why, if so many people are still unprepared? Based on evidence from the various DTV tests conducted in the past several months, it's not lack of awareness that's the problem—rather, it's viewers who are "either procrastinating," "in denial" (as one observer put it), or suffering from "technical naiveté" (from this spot-on L.A. Times editorial).

As far as "technical naiveté" goes, that's perfectly understandable—and that's why there are phone banks ready to answer questions, and as the L.A. Times notes, the FCC recently doled out $8 million in grant money for volunteer community outreach.

But while I've yet to run into anyone who's totally ignorant of the coming transition, I've met plenty of viewers who fall into the "in denial" category—and for them, nothing short of seeing their old TVs go dark will snap them into reality.

One more factoid: According to this New York Times story, about 6.8 percent of U.S. households aren't ready for the DTV transition—meaning that 93.2 percent are ready. (Remember, only those with older analog TVs and over-the-air antennas will be affected; if you've got a TV with a digital tuner, or you're getting your signals over cable or satellite, you're all set.)

That said, Congress needs to step up and approve more money for the converter-box coupon program, enough so that the million-plus names on their waiting list can get their coupons in a timely (key word: timely) manner—as in days, not weeks.

No, the DTV transition won't be fun—or easy. But as many others have pointed out, it'll be a painful process no matter when we do it, and the sooner we get started (and we've been working on this thing for 10 years now), the sooner we can use the newly available spectrum for next-generation wireless networks—4G, to be specific—that'll benefit all of us.

So, what do you think: To delay, or not to delay?

Related:
What you need to know about the DTV transition [Yahoo! Tech]

Comments on DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 46 Posted by fkgrant248 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Some people ordered coupons not understanding what "over the air meant". They have allowed theirs to expire. Now allow the govt. to reissue expired ones to those on the waiting list and/or new requests.

  • 47 Posted by nogard64 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    this is just sad, have any of you been out of the country? Rest of the developed world has way surpassed us on this, Japan has been using DTV since the 90's! The rest of the developed world has also moved on to FIBER for networking too! Grats UH-bama, you are such a 2 faced lying idiot! You say you want to build up the US infrastructure yet you want to delay something has simple as getting a new TV or Box? And if Uh bama wants to help the economy wouldn't this be a great way of doing so, getting people to purchase new TVs? The bottom line is UH-bama is a phony 2 faced say anything to be popular liar, he just wanted his name in the history books, now he couldn't care less what happens to America. great job everyone! We bought into his fancy speeches now its time to move backwards! ENJOY AMERICA ENJOY!

  • 49 Posted by blaineandcat on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    Don't care. Got rid of TV last spring; best move I ever made.

  • 50 Posted by andrea33lynn on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    I work in the cable industry and I can tell you that if we push back the date it will be CRAZY. All the paperwork and contracts that will have to be redone and pushed back. There is a lot more work than you think that has gone into all of this. Let's do it now it is not that big of deal....really people! And RorbinCalendar--- I believe that Obama won over more than 50% of the population so stop being Bitter and get on board!

  • 51 Posted by garciamagdalena69 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'd say...do it now!!!...those people that are not yet ready, will NEVER BE READY....even if given 10 more years.

  • 53 Posted by jpopaholic on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    besides the fact that Obama has no experience in anything, and the only thing he wants to ever talk about is the economy even though there is still no plan there but to just spend money. It's not surprising that he would tackle such an important topic as TV viewership and not foreign policy since we have only one president at a time (Obama's own words)...so I am guessing Bush is not handling the TV crisis

  • 54 Posted by surfotown09 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    why does the goverment have to get involved in tv everything they tough they screw up the way it is noe is fine if the power goes out you can watch tv on battery tv when they change to digital if power goes out how are you gonna plug in your converter box its cabel trying to tax the heck out of us so they can have a monpoly b.s. if you ask me plus if you want high def subscribe to hdtv

  • 55 Posted by fam2foto on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    Do not delay - Do it on Feb 17th and few people will have problem. Also Re-activate expired coupons. I had a elder friend who got coupon and purchase converter box even though he has comcast cable connection. He does not even have antenna or HDTV. What

  • 56 Posted by xoticscene on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    even if you don't get the coupon they're like 50 bux..for you tv slaves you'll pay up

  • 57 Posted by vettailgunner on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    When President Obama takes office and the Chairman of the FCC has not moved on his suggestion then he should fire him. There are too many examples of people not being able to use the coupons before they expire because of monetary issues and also of people still waiting for the coupons they ordered months ago. the only thing that the delay would effect is the ability of the FCC to be able to auction off the frequency bands.

  • 58 Posted by snowenloe on Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:03PM EST Report Abuse

    Lets get on with it already. It's not like people havent had time to get ready, and why punish those who have taken the steps to be prepared? I have crappy Charter Cable out here in Western Oregon and they still broadcast some stations in analog. When February 17th hits I will finally get my local stations in digital, if the date for the transition isnt pushed back.

  • 59 Posted by edscheirer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    delay....give me a break if ur not ready to bad ...folks u have had years to be ready 90 more days wont help....hey congress listen up....when the tvs go off people will fix the problem.....congress ur done let us handle it

  • 60 Posted by caligurell on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    This sounds like a backdoor tactic to get another "BAILOUT INJECTION" so that it can be full of "PORK" with no accountability!

  • 61 Posted by seclark1717 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    Anyone have as much trouble with a digital signal reliability in areas not "urban"? This is a problem in cases of national/regional/local emergencies.. (what about hazardous weather conditions ?)

  • 62 Posted by tweedpower on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    Let me just be the first to say: "It's Obama's fault!" LOL!!! So, montemail, how does it feel to be on the other side???! Be prepared to be defensive for the next four years--and you may want to use more intelligent responses than "just SHUT UP." I'm imagining Congress yelling "shut up" to one another--no wonder they can't get anything accomplished. Meanwhile, I don't mind holding on to my FREE TV airwaves for a while longer while we figure out a way to stimulate the economy without raising or creating new taxes to cover the cost of cutting off those free airwaves for the few who can't afford monthly cable and satellite bills. Hold tight to your FREE radio waves, folks--you know they're coming for those, too!

  • 63 Posted by leonardo10_99 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Many of you are asking why the government needs to do this. It is not to make you pay money to watch tv or to control your life but rather the government needs the bandwidth where analog tv is being broadcast for emergency channels. Because of their need, they wanted to help with the converter box costs by offering rebates to consumers. The benefit for consumers will be a better picture quality. For most people it won't matter since they have cable or satellite tv and those signals will be converted by those companies. This program is an absolutely necessary move for our national security. And yes, TV will still be free...unless you get cable or satellite.

  • 64 Posted by lura747 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why don't they just leave things alone. If its not broke don't fix it. When this starts a lot of older folks are going to loose reception, and TV is a big part of there lives. I have come to the conclusion FCC must stand for Federal Clown Collage Ray R

  • 65 Posted by jimbo_mr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Whether it's delayed 90 days or a year, the 6% of people who are not ready now will only drop to 5%. When the screen goes blank, people will figure it out, and it won't kill anyone to miss Howie Mandell once.

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.