DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:42AM EST

See Comments (300)

Obama's transition team and Democratic lawmakers want to push back the analog TV shutoff date by as much as 90 days, while the FCC warns that such a move would only make matters worse. My view: It's time to rip off the Band-Aid.

First of all, here's the latest: Pointing to recent reports that federal funding for DTV converter box coupons has run out (well, for now, at least), Obama's camp is calling for a delay in the February 17 DTV transition date, while Senate Democrat Jay Rockefeller is reportedly prepping legislation that would push the date back 90 days.

Current FCC Chairman Kevin Martin counters that delaying the analog TV shutoff date would only add to viewer confusion, and he proposes a couple of alternatives: Either a new infusion of funding from Congress for the coupon program, or eliminating the 90-day expiration date for coupons that have yet to be redeemed.

So, what to do? After all, the Feb. 17 deadline is barely a month away.

Personally, I say we stick with the deadline. But why, if so many people are still unprepared? Based on evidence from the various DTV tests conducted in the past several months, it's not lack of awareness that's the problem—rather, it's viewers who are "either procrastinating," "in denial" (as one observer put it), or suffering from "technical naiveté" (from this spot-on L.A. Times editorial).

As far as "technical naiveté" goes, that's perfectly understandable—and that's why there are phone banks ready to answer questions, and as the L.A. Times notes, the FCC recently doled out $8 million in grant money for volunteer community outreach.

But while I've yet to run into anyone who's totally ignorant of the coming transition, I've met plenty of viewers who fall into the "in denial" category—and for them, nothing short of seeing their old TVs go dark will snap them into reality.

One more factoid: According to this New York Times story, about 6.8 percent of U.S. households aren't ready for the DTV transition—meaning that 93.2 percent are ready. (Remember, only those with older analog TVs and over-the-air antennas will be affected; if you've got a TV with a digital tuner, or you're getting your signals over cable or satellite, you're all set.)

That said, Congress needs to step up and approve more money for the converter-box coupon program, enough so that the million-plus names on their waiting list can get their coupons in a timely (key word: timely) manner—as in days, not weeks.

No, the DTV transition won't be fun—or easy. But as many others have pointed out, it'll be a painful process no matter when we do it, and the sooner we get started (and we've been working on this thing for 10 years now), the sooner we can use the newly available spectrum for next-generation wireless networks—4G, to be specific—that'll benefit all of us.

So, what do you think: To delay, or not to delay?

Related:
What you need to know about the DTV transition [Yahoo! Tech]

Comments on DTV transition: To delay or not to delay

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by zbearx on Thu Sep 3, 2009 11:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    I like Obama, but he's wrong on this one. It's time to do this...the country has been talking about it and preparing for it for 5 years. As I see it, delaying won't help people procrastinating or in denial...they won't do anything until they go dark. Those technologically challenged (some number fewer than 7% of the country's TV viewers) need the motivation of having to solve the problem to get at finding the help they need. The coupon program being out of funds is no reason to stop. That problem can be solved by Congress, and in the meantime people can buy their own boxes and get reimbursed. I say DO IT.

  • 7 Posted by peter_simone2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    just get it done and be rid of this nonsense. those that can't afford boxes should be given free tv for life. Obama will fix everything

  • 8 Posted by hostileapostile630 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    rorbincalendar....YES! It would be rediculous to push this back after so much planning. Just do it, I'm not sure exactly how much more money I'd be ok with them approving for this thing, but I guess you can't just leave some people hanging. On the other hand...how many people still legitimately need coupons and how many are just failing to act? Most of the population is ready and the best way to convince the rest to get ready is just to do it.

  • 9 Posted by montemail on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    rorbincalender..sorry but we've heard your crap for the last 8 years!!Obama may not be right in this case, by the way he hasn't been sworn in yet, but relax!!We had to deal with your crap for 8 years so get an issue!! Just SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 10 Posted by ckanotz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    How do you use this computer thing? Can't somebody just give me back my darn TYPEWRITER!!!

  • 11 Posted by angryandy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    I ordered 2 coupons and intentionally threw them out so that I could save the taxpayers $100.

  • 12 Posted by singstrumbeat on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    I've got a question for anyone who's truly knows the answer... Why are tax dollars being spent on these coupons in the first place? Where is it in the constitution that the government (you know, us tax payers) is obligated to pay for this program? Who approved this expenditure and for what purpose ultimately? Just curious, especially given the current state our economy and where it's headed.

  • 13 Posted by erifod on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yup, let's just be done with it. That 6.8% won't be ready in 90 days, and they won't be ready in 6.8 years, either. Time to just go full speed ahead.

  • 14 Posted by yhwdeck on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have one of those cockamamie converters but I wonder if I will ever use it. I got sick, sick, sick of tv and wall to wall commercials and what tv shows and movies I watch come via the Internet. No cable tv, no satellite tv, no broadcast tv. LIFE IS WONDERFUL.

  • 15 Posted by banaka53 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    All I have to say, is what do you do about the people that are in fringe areas, and have been told they may (probably) won't be able to get anything with the converter boxes. That they would have to go to satellite? Nothing is being said or done about this. There will be alot of people without tv ....and unable to pay for satellite.

  • 16 Posted by cmakva on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    Delay! A lot of people simply do not have the extra money right now.

  • 17 Posted by angelfish59@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    I don't like the DTV idea at all. If you ask me , this is just one more freedom the government and big business are taking away. Why do we need to change? Why can't we just keep TV free to all? It is a violation of our freedoms to make us buy yet one more piece of machinery.

  • 18 Posted by microphone8393 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    Lost coupon, wait til the last minute, excuses, excuses. Cut the cord (or in this case attach it) and get on with DTV

  • 20 Posted by dbfinlay on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    Conspiracy. Half the problem is the media. Nobody in the media calls February 17 a cut-off. They call it a switch-over date. To a person not educated about the issue, it sounds like you must wait until that date before you can do anything to make the switch! Nobody in the media is saying "Change now, change today - don't wait until the 17th ....digital is already turned on (and it's better)". Let's not forget, as long as people don't switch, this whole thing is still hot news. If the media got everyone to switch, who would watch the news about it anymore?

  • 21 Posted by gardenergal1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    I wish people understood the ramifications of not implementing this on time. Channel 69 has to be given up for 911 US wide. If this does not happen it will cost local Government billions. 50% of the country has already been rebanded and the problems that will arise from making this turnover on time will cause problems galore. People have had more than enough time to make the change in their homes, let's not cause problems for everyone to passify the few.

  • 22 Posted by steve_03837 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I requested my coupon and have not received it yet. I hear the FCC sold the space for $9B and ran out of money for the coupons. Is this true? The only solution for a great many people would be to delay the switchover. Good for Obama for recognizing real peoples problem.

  • 23 Posted by mlregester on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why does the government need to purchase these converters? TV is a small luxury. If you cannot afford it, deal without. Too many gov't programs dragging this country down! Give me this, give me that. Good by sweet America!

  • 24 Posted by lrcapt8 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think the whole thing was stupid to begin with. I see absolutely no reason for going to digital to begin with. I have a satellite dish, but I don't get local channels on it. The box I got has never worked, not that I much care. There doesn't seem to be much on the regular channels to watch, anyway. My parents have nothing but broadcast TV and they won't pay for cable or a satellite. They got a back that works "sometimes", and have pretty much decided that if the signal goes dark, they'll do without TV altogether. Can't say that I blame them.

  • 25 Posted by bjb4715 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    Reactivate expired coupons. Not fair to ask people to pay for converter boxes. They did not ask for this so called upgraded & many simply cannot afford to purchase converter boxes.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.