The DTV delay bill: It's baaaaaack!

Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:28AM EST

See Comments (421)

Like a zombie that just won't die, the DTV delay bill—which was voted down by the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday—has sprung back to life, with a little help from the Senate.

Reuters reports that a second bill—"essentially" a twin of the defeated House bill, which sought to push the Feb. 17 shutoff of analog TV signals back to June 12—won unanimous support from the Senate on Thursday, and may end up shambling its way back to the House next week.

As with the original DTV delay bill, the new proposal—devised by Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican counterpart Kay Bailey Hutchison—would give viewers four more months to prepare for the DTV transition, while allowing those TV stations that have already started dismantling their analog TV equipment to go all-digital before the new, June 12 deadline.

And if the bill goes before the Democrat-controlled House under standard, simple-majority adoption rules—as opposed to the fast-tracking procedure used on Wednesday, which requires a two-thirds majority for passage (the original vote was 258-168, just shy of the two-thirds needed)—there's an excellent chance that the Feb. 17 DTV transition date will, in fact, be delayed.

In case you were wondering, well … yes, the whole "DTV delay" thing has gotten pretty nuts, and if viewers weren't already confused about when the transition was going to occur, they are now.

Yes, it's true that an estimated 6.5 million U.S. households still aren't ready for the DTV transition, which would render analog TVs with over-the-air antennas useless without a $40-$60 DTV converter box (more details here).

And yes, there's no question that the government's $1.5 billion DTV converter-box coupon program—which allows for two $40 coupons per household—is a mess, with at least two million people on a waiting list after spending limits were reached a few weeks ago. (Money flows back into the program every week as unused coupons—which are good for 90 days—expire, and legislators have been proposing various ways to boost funding.)

But we've been working on this DTV transition thing for more than 10 years, people. This oft-cited Nielsen poll, looked at from another perspective, shows that more than 94 percent of America is ready for the change. And the DTV coupon program wouldn't be in such dire straits had not so many applicants—who've had almost a year to apply for their coupons—waited until the last minute, or received their coupons but never bothered to use them.

Moreover, once the wireless spectrum that's being used for analog TV is vacated, we'll be able to use it for new technologies like 4G wireless services (think ubiquitous wireless broadband, for everyone) as well as improved channels of emergency communication for local police and fire departments (which are all chomping at the bit to deploy their new systems).

No, the DTV transition won't be easy, but surely we can find a better way to help the last 5.7 percent of U.S. households cross the digital TV gap without pushing back the deadline for everyone.

Related:
Senate approves bill to delay digital TV [Reuters]
DTV transition guide [Yahoo! Tech]

Comments on The DTV delay bill: It's baaaaaack!

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 27 Posted by lsmyth_indy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    Having worked for a cable provider for the last ten years, we have been telling our customers about this for many of those. Of course we did NOT know the date util last year. Believe me, these people have had more than AMPLE time to get ready for this. Some people feel if they do NOTHING then NOTHING will happen to them. Sometimes ignorance can't be an excuse. Switch it and then they don't have an option. They've had atleast one year with the designated date of February 17th, 2009 to work with and they still have not done anything. Take away their televisions and they will then AND ONLY THEN do something abou it.

  • 28 Posted by carlos_caceres on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    Change it now!!! more time means nothing to the people that hasn't done it yet. Save the tax payers money.

  • 29 Posted by pastorrandyyoung on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    Switch now. So what if some people don't have TV for a little while? I'll be one of them. No TV. So what? Spend more time with family, talk, play games, go outside, a date with spouse...

  • 30 Posted by khmookie40 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hey, just give me my coupon and I will get my box or make it so I can get the money for the coupon after I get my box. What's the difference?

  • 31 Posted by bobowen67 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    The government is selling the additional air space that is being created by the change to digit for billions of dollars. Taxpayer dollars should not be used for the change!!

  • 32 Posted by bbrock293 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    Apparently 2+ years was not long enough to come up with 50.00. Just more of people relying on the government to take care of them. Way to go democrats.

  • 34 Posted by rainbow_ltd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    Talk of "pork" -- why the heck should the government give people money to watch their favorite idiot programs? If people can't afford a 40-buck converter, they can't afford to sit there on their collective butts either. What is this, TV socialism? It's obviously a program that was put together by the GOP as its favorite "pork special" to buy votes.

  • 35 Posted by ddthornton8235@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    They've advertised the February date every day for over a year now. If you aren't ready...too bad. Go to the bar and watch TV if your too lazy to take care of business.

  • 36 Posted by brownp15 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    umm. what are people doing about DTV in areas where no DTV transmitters exist..ever hear of echostar? it's a SATELLITE...I hear if You buy a thing called a "satellite dish" and a satellite "reciever" you can pick up TV ANYWHERE in the world....but what Do I know?

  • 37 Posted by tsang006 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    I don't think the changeover should be delayed. Some people won't do anything until their TV screens go blue, and it may not be a bad idea to let those "unfortunate" people do something different than watching the mostly useless TV. They can read, listen to radio, EXERCISE, or even talk to the other PEOPLE (family members) in the house. It could be a very good thing to them. TV wasn't a necessity. It didn't exist 50yrs ago and people still live happily ever after.

  • 39 Posted by lamar_310 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    Post #10 is a lie and not true in any way. The elderly are more prepared than folks who are in their 20's according to an earlier Yahoo report. The people who are holding us up are people who waited until the last minute to get a government handout for a converter box. I paid cash without some coupon to fix my 82 year old grandmother's kitchen tv. If $50 is keeping you from watching tv, then you are out of luck. The government was not created to help people watch tv. Get a better job or sacrifice something else for a month until you can afford your converter box. DO NOT PUNISH PEOPLE WHO DID WHAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO DO BY THE DEADLINE...PLEASE!!!! In America the majority rules and 94% of us are ready to go.

  • 40 Posted by dtmedin on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    While I agree that the delay should not be postponed (most people won't die without TV), I can only assume Ben has not negotiated the converter coupon system, which has been a screwup since the word GO. My parents applied, and got their coupons after a 2+ month wait, with TWO WEEKS remaining before their expiration date. This, and the antenna dependency, will catch a lot of people unprepared. Being ready for the switch, if you didn't have a functional UHF antenna previously, is MUCH more expensive than that converter box, especially in fringe areas. Lastly, one year ago, there were NOT converters in stores. They appeared en-masse around June. If you ordered your coupon early, chances are it was near expiry by the time you could actually buy a converter!

  • 41 Posted by randi_tumlin on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sick of the commercials. It's TV, for cryin' out loud! TV!!!!

  • 42 Posted by wi.badgers on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is a joke. If people aren't ready it's their own darn fault for being so lazy. I guarantee you the poeple that aren't ready now won't be ready 4 months from now either.

  • 43 Posted by coopercraz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree just switch it we have had plenty of time to get ready we all new about it for years. It is your own fault if you are not ready you waited until the last moment so suffer the consequenses. If you are not ready by now, more time won't make a bit of difference. It will motivate you to do something if you have no TV!!!! Its just like anything else if you turn off their utilities they will make sure they pay the bill to have them turn back on. So it is time switch. NO DELAY!!!

  • 44 Posted by catnapkid on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    Listen, these folks who still have analog sets have had months to get those converter boxes. The coupons have been advertized everywhere. In many cases - with the rebate - the boxes are free. So, you give them even more time - there will still be millions who will just put it off and not do anything. Deadlines are deadlines - they have had their notice - if, they can not get their acts together, we shouldn't coddle them. Let them listen to radio . . .

  • 45 Posted by chrisandelyse@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    Digital TV either works 100%, or it doesn't work at all. No more "snowy" pictures. Well, for us in rural America, "snowy" sure beats Nothing except 5 flavors of the same Christian station and our lifeline, PBS! And yes, we do have a big, directional antenna on a mast. Yes, there are families who choose not to have cable because of the cost and the bad influence of much of the programming.Our child is much better behaved since we gave up Comcast last year, but it would sure be nice to get local weather during tornado season! As for the excuse that first responders need the spectrum, this is a fallacy. They're not coordinating what they have.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.