The DTV delay bill: It's baaaaaack!

Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:28AM EST

See Comments (421)

Like a zombie that just won't die, the DTV delay bill—which was voted down by the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday—has sprung back to life, with a little help from the Senate.

Reuters reports that a second bill—"essentially" a twin of the defeated House bill, which sought to push the Feb. 17 shutoff of analog TV signals back to June 12—won unanimous support from the Senate on Thursday, and may end up shambling its way back to the House next week.

As with the original DTV delay bill, the new proposal—devised by Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican counterpart Kay Bailey Hutchison—would give viewers four more months to prepare for the DTV transition, while allowing those TV stations that have already started dismantling their analog TV equipment to go all-digital before the new, June 12 deadline.

And if the bill goes before the Democrat-controlled House under standard, simple-majority adoption rules—as opposed to the fast-tracking procedure used on Wednesday, which requires a two-thirds majority for passage (the original vote was 258-168, just shy of the two-thirds needed)—there's an excellent chance that the Feb. 17 DTV transition date will, in fact, be delayed.

In case you were wondering, well … yes, the whole "DTV delay" thing has gotten pretty nuts, and if viewers weren't already confused about when the transition was going to occur, they are now.

Yes, it's true that an estimated 6.5 million U.S. households still aren't ready for the DTV transition, which would render analog TVs with over-the-air antennas useless without a $40-$60 DTV converter box (more details here).

And yes, there's no question that the government's $1.5 billion DTV converter-box coupon program—which allows for two $40 coupons per household—is a mess, with at least two million people on a waiting list after spending limits were reached a few weeks ago. (Money flows back into the program every week as unused coupons—which are good for 90 days—expire, and legislators have been proposing various ways to boost funding.)

But we've been working on this DTV transition thing for more than 10 years, people. This oft-cited Nielsen poll, looked at from another perspective, shows that more than 94 percent of America is ready for the change. And the DTV coupon program wouldn't be in such dire straits had not so many applicants—who've had almost a year to apply for their coupons—waited until the last minute, or received their coupons but never bothered to use them.

Moreover, once the wireless spectrum that's being used for analog TV is vacated, we'll be able to use it for new technologies like 4G wireless services (think ubiquitous wireless broadband, for everyone) as well as improved channels of emergency communication for local police and fire departments (which are all chomping at the bit to deploy their new systems).

No, the DTV transition won't be easy, but surely we can find a better way to help the last 5.7 percent of U.S. households cross the digital TV gap without pushing back the deadline for everyone.

Related:
Senate approves bill to delay digital TV [Reuters]
DTV transition guide [Yahoo! Tech]

Comments on The DTV delay bill: It's baaaaaack!

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 66 Posted by jastodeck on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    Switch already! Hey, I thought we wanted to stimulate the economy. Going Digital now and saying tough luck to those who didn't get ready, would decrease government spending and increase consumer spending. Isn't that what we want? Don't we want to open up new avenues of air space for various new technologies which would stimulat the economy. How many people of that 6% already have cable or dish and the coupon is for their 4th tv in the kitchen or living room! Come on! This new administration will bring what was promised! change... except it won't be the kind that anyone wants. People will get what they voted for!

  • 67 Posted by edpgill on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    Let's just get it done---enough notice has been given and there MUST be more important things for our gov't to be thinking about and giving time to!! Ya think!!

  • 68 Posted by klr1001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    Agreed. Just do it already. There's always someone who isn't ready. If the last 5% hadn't procrastinated then they would be ready for the switch too, which has been coming for years.

  • 69 Posted by robrtsonrd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    Delaying the transition hurts cable and satellite users. Cramming in the analog signals has caused degradation of the HD experience (PC World had an article about it last year). Why punish those of us who are ready? Not that the politicians would have a clue about such things.

  • 70 Posted by warshipgod on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is no way going to help K B Hutchison win the Governors race in Texas. People dont like her already, the question is do they not like her more than the current Gov. Delaying will do nothing but confuse more people and cost ALL of America more money. If we wait our economy could be even worse off then it is now hence delaying it longer. Quite wasting OUR money and move on!

  • 72 Posted by kelseyrt_189 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm really sick of this. I understand that not everybody has a converter box, but they've had a good amount of time to get one. Four months will not make a difference when it's already been years that people have known amount this. It's not like they sprung it on everybody a few months ago.

  • 73 Posted by n8isaham on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    People will have there pop, smokes, cell phones but they couldnt find the time and or money to get the freaken box or coupon to get the box. they dont deserve my money to get it either. time to stand on your own. quit milking the tax payer money tree. if you cant get the box, then read a book or listen to the radio. or go smoke, have a pop can use your cell phone to call your congressman while you wait for your check to come at the begining of the month.

  • 74 Posted by bytethis84 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    If the people that have waited this long and are not prepared for the changeover what makes the senators think that they will do anything but wait again for the next deadline and still not be ready. Just make the switch over and be done with it

  • 75 Posted by danngarner@bellsouth.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    why do we always cater to those who wait to do everything to the last minute, and expect the government to bail them out or postpone the transition. The $40 rebate for converter boxes was advertised for a long time. Do without it now

  • 76 Posted by mr_fat69 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    Get it over with if people are still that far behind they don't need TV anyways. There has been more than sufficent time for anyone to scramble up $40.00. There gonna slow the switch over up and it's gonna cost the stations money and who will pay the ones of us who are prepared.

  • 77 Posted by melodieus2001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    There are 2 million people on the waiting list for converter discount coupons. Does the Senate bill include funding to cover all 2 million of these people NOW? If not, it's business as usual in Washington - mindless idiots making laws based on how much money flows into their personal pockets. Think about - they found $700 Billion for rich bankers, but can't find $80 Million to back coupons for the conversion.

  • 78 Posted by ladyjng on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think people are missing the point. Delaying isn't about those that aren't ready for the switch "missing American Idol", it's about companies that advertise to those (millions of) people losing money because they can't reach customers through TV commercials. Wake up. Nobody cares about the poor in any other situation, this is no different. Cable is expensive and that is what this effort is about...those people can't afford 100 bucks a month like you complainers but mcDonalds, Sears and Kraft still want them to buy their products. How will they reach them with their t.v.s off???

  • 79 Posted by beavdoggy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    This whole thing has been a joke. If people lose out on their basic couple channels who cares? Read a book or talk to your kids. It's not like the government is turning off someone's heat.

  • 80 Posted by saloonmen on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    Who cares, there's nothing on TV worth watching.

  • 81 Posted by shel375 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    its the same old story,always cave to the lazy people.they sit around and do nothing, then whine when the deadline nears.

  • 82 Posted by tjmac1968 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is retarded. If they haven't gotten this taken care of this by now, tough luck. I can't even believe they are even considering delaying this.

  • 83 Posted by robbiegwiz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm sure all six people in the US who still use rabbit ears for their TV reception are on the edge of their seats about how this is going to come out. Seriously - does anyone except Congress and the media care about this?

  • 84 Posted by chasing60 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    You have to remember that a large percent of the people that are not "ready" for digital tv have cable.. The signal there is still analog and doesn't require an changes on the customers part to keep getting TV. Digital TVs have been on sale for years and there is no valid reason for a delay. I have a limited income but I am digital ready because my old TV stopped working and I had to get a new one. The price since has dropped 30% over what I had to pay to get it.

  • 85 Posted by realcomaboy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    I couldn't care less about 4G wireless or putting more money in the pockets of the cable industry. I'm left hoping that my DT signal reception improves, somehow, after the switch because right now it's less relaible than my analog reception. And all the hi-def in the world doesn't mean a thing if you can't pull in a signal.

More Posts: First Prev 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.