Femtocells aim to boost indoor cell reception

Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:47PM EST

See Comments (46)

Can't get a decent cell signal in your living room? I know the feeling. That's why more and more carriers are offering femtocells: compact, antenna-equipped boxes that use your home broadband network to boost cell reception. Clever idea—although you'll pay extra for the privilege, of course.

Sprint has had its own femtocell device—the Airave—on sale for more than a year now, while Verizon Wireless announced its own femtocell service this week. That leaves AT&T, which is rumored to have a femtocell product in the works, and T-Mobile, which offers something a little different: Unlimited HotSpot Calling (formerly known as T-Mobile HotSpot @Home).

So, how do femtocells work? You can read up on the nuts and bolts at Wikipedia, but roughly speaking, they act as cell network signal repeaters (with an effective range of about 5,000 square feet), piggybacking onto your home broadband network to boost patchy coverage—good news for those of us with terrible reception in our homes and apartments. (I live in a 150-year-old-plus brownstone in Brooklyn, and unless I stand by a window, callers can't hear me.)

The femtocell device itself looks a lot like a standard Wi-Fi router; just plug it into your home network via Ethernet and get ready for more bars. In Sprint's case, its Airave femtocell also comes with a GPS receiver, intended as both a 911 locator and to make sure that you're only using the device in Sprint's coverage area (and not, say, in China or something).

Verizon Wireless is the latest U.S. carrier to jump on the femtocell bandwagon, just having announced its "Network Extender" earlier this week. The box is pricey at $249, and it doesn't support 3G EV-DO data; that said, once you fork over the cash, there aren't any additional monthly fees.

Sprint's Airave femtocell (which uses the same Samsung hardware as Verizon's Network Expander) is way cheaper at $99.99, but you'll have to cough up a monthy service fee: $4.99 a month for "basic" coverage, or $10/month for unlimited Airave calling on a single-line Sprint account (the unlimited charge goes up to $20 a month for multi-line family plans).

AT&T has yet to offer its own femtocell service, but based on this customer survey that's making the rounds, I'd expect to hear an announcement in the near future.

Finally, there's T-Mobile, which doesn't do femtocells at all. Instead, the carrier has a service called Unlimited HotSpot Calling (formerly known as T-Mobile HotSpot @Home, and not to be confused with the new @Home "landline" service), which lets you make unlimited calls over Wi-Fi for $10 a month. (You're supposed to use a special, $29.99 T-Mobile router with the service, but as this review notes, Unlimited HotSpot Calling should work just fine with your existing Wi-Fi network).

Pretty nice—but there's a catch. While any Sprint or Verizon phone will work with their respective femtocell units, you must use one of T-Mobile's UMA-enabled Wi-Fi handsets for Unlimited HotSpot calling. Supported models include the BlackBerry Pearl, the Samsung T229 and Katalyst, and the Nokia 6301 and 7510 handsets—and for now, that's it.

So, who out there would be willing to pay extra for better cell coverage indoors? Or would you rather just stick with a landline?

Comments on Femtocells aim to boost indoor cell reception

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by jny_raj on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    The cell phone industry has to be the biggest scam in history. So you have to pay for a 250 dollar box so you can get good reception in your house. HAhahahahahahaah How stupid can people be????

  • 27 Posted by ephilpott@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    My Verizon coverage at my home is horrible, even when standing outside. Unfortunately, the coverage maps for other vendors don't show any better coverage for my area. Fortunately for me I don't pay for my cell service-my employer does. However, I feel that consumers should use their buying power to let the cellular industry know that they will not accept poor service. But for that to work consumers will need to call up and threaten to cancel their service if they don't get better coverage. If the cell companies don't offer to improve your coverage then cancel your service with them and try another vendor or better yet try that trusty old land line. Eventually, they will hopefully get the message and add some more repeaters to improve coverage. Next, we can work on getting them to lower their outrageous pricing plans. Can anyone say price fixing!? I knew you could...

  • 28 Posted by jonpaul1946 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    This seems to be great for those who need it, but Verizon really kills people with the price. Lower the price and get more sales. Or change it so you can adapt it to your home telephone wireing and use those phones also. Everyone always wants to make the money and give little.

  • 29 Posted by gkel326 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    Buy a Blue Tooth for fifty bucks and put your phone in your window

  • 30 Posted by pack6544 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's not always the fault of the mobile company.. I live in Utah up in a mountainous area.. the city I live in will not allow Verizon to put a cell tower in city boundaries.. as a matter of fact they will not allow any company to do so. So i'll gladly pay the extra to have perfect reception.

  • 31 Posted by lequinte on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I refuse to pay $250 to boost my reception. Fortunately for me, I live in a medium sized city and most of the providers work well in the city. If one company's coverage is bad at my house, I will either suck it up or leave the company. The wireless companies are already making enough off me as it is!

  • 32 Posted by phatspeed7x on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a Zboost cellphone booster in my house that works great. And there is no addition cost to use it. Before I would only have 1-2 bars of service, but now I have full bars. Great concidering I need a good signal for my data plan for the laptop.

  • 33 Posted by adowd2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    Aren't there generic in home cell phone signal boosters with no fees available? I remember looking for one a year ago when I was at a military base for training. The signal for almost all carriers were very week and we were going to buy this a legacy item to leave behind for future classes.

  • 34 Posted by adowd2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    phatspeed7x hit the nail on the head at the same time I was posting my question. I believe the Zboost is the one we were looking at and iirc it had good reviews.

  • 35 Posted by troutman4mayor on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    This writer should get his facts straight before posting. The T-Mobile unlimited WiFi service actually cost $20 a month and the T229 is NOT WiFi compatible. In addition to those phones you can also use the Blackberry Curve and the T339. Do your RESEARCH! For you consumers, check out the @Home service from T-Mobile. It's only $10 a month and you get unlimited calling from home to anywhere in the US.

  • 36 Posted by keithtipton@ymail.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's funny, I,m located in Downtown San Jose and Just jup till a couple of weeks ago. My cell phone service in my Apartment was just fine.Now I constantly get disconnected,and my sister in Chicago is experiencing the same . You don't suppose the weak recepton of late has anything to do with the marketing of Femtocells do you. please post your comments I really wonder many people are experiencing the same.

  • 37 Posted by capt444 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    They've had wireless repeaters for cell phones for awhile now. Alot of truckers use them and I have one in my home. It is a repeater bi-linear that's raises my signal to about 4 watts and the recieved signal too. But be careful, the recieved signal is an amplified signal, meaning that if your in a fringe area you will be amplifying a scratchy signal.

  • 38 Posted by davesax36 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    Reception from everyone but ATT is pretty terrible in my neighborhood, but I'm not willing to switch phones and carriers just for that. I have a home phone, and actually use it... I do a lot of texting from home, but not so much actually cell phone use. There are NO towers anywhere near us, and there's a TV station broadcast tower very close (don't know if that could really affect anything). Everyone in the neighborhood has pretty much tried all carriers and been on the phone with their tech support a lot. I just think it's ridiculous that a major metropolitan area has bad cell coverage ANYWHERE. I guess I'll look into Zboost and see if it actually does anything. I'd love to know what it does to get more signal into my house...

  • 39 Posted by porep_ronald on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is old news to patrons of www.cyberguys.com which has been selling a device that boosts cell phone signals without any added charge. I do not have one so I can not say how well the booster works. I just suffer cell phone signal loss wherever I can not get a signal. My mom is in a nursing home and I can not get a signal in the home except near the windows. I also have problems getting calls in the car. My carrier is AT&T which is supposed to be the best in the world but has its coverage gaps.

  • 40 Posted by bullgodking on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    i am satisfied with what reception i get. Not going to go to far for extra bar at home. On the road would be nice sometimes but as of now i never lose signal long as i got my blue tooth headset and the phone mounted to the windshield. I want cheap satellite mobile tv. When are they gonna get on that subject for real.

  • 42 Posted by gdog989 on Sat May 23, 2009 10:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    Are you all stupid? cell phone service is just a radio signal, it is going to get crappier if it has to go through walls over mountains/hills through the trees. just like your local radio station with a tenth of the power. no provider is going to tell you that your going to get perfect coverage in a darn building. get ur heads out your butts and give providers a break!

  • 43 Posted by bella77427 on Mon Aug 3, 2009 8:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    I can't seem to post under the appropriate topic for some strange reason hence this comment is related to the probability if Netflix on iphone. Sounds good if one is prepared to view an entire movie on such a device. I know the only way I would is if after renting it on the phone I view it on nothing less than a 50 inch device at no extra cost in terms of airtime and equipment. Of course it can be done with additional equiptment.....but for those who suffer from the "tight-wad syndrome" it is rather somewhat of a challenge.

  • 44 Posted by stumblefoot_2000 on Fri Sep 4, 2009 9:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    I use a Wilson cell phone booster in my pickup, Ive never lost service even in some really remote areas. I have good cell reception @ home so no booster required. But there are other boosters on the market, less expensive, and not brand specific. My Wilson works on all cell phones within about 10 feet of my truck. The Mexicans @ the oil wells in TX, NM, OK, LA love it. :)

  • 45 Posted by crazy30135 on Tue Oct 6, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    I live in a ridge and vally area of the U.S. Cell phone reception is bad at best. Not only the terain is causing the trouble, the county charges and exorbanant fee to erect a repeater tower. The result is few towers and lousy terain. I purchased a Verison Wireless Network Extender and now I can talk on the cell phone without driving to the ridge top. It don't work well on the internet but that's why I pay for Comcast.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.