DRM-Free Tunes on Sale at Wal-Mart

Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:43AM EDT

See Comments (223)

The retail giant just began selling digital music free from copy protection today, at just 94 cents per song, versus $1.29/song on iTunes. Let the DRM-free price wars begin!

Reuters is reporting that Wal-Mart's DRM-free music store is selling thousands of songs from labels such as EMI (which signed a DRM-free pact with Apple last April) and Universal Music (which recently announced that it was entering the DRM-free music fray, although not on iTunes). Even better, the copy protection-free tracks will go for just 94 cents a song, compared to the $1.29 premium that Apple is charging for its DRM-free music on iTunes.

Wal-Mart's new DRM-free music store will include tracks by artists such as the Rolling Stones, Amy Winehouse, and Maroon 5, according to Reuters, and you'll be able to snap up entire albums for $9.22 in addition to the 94 cents/song pricing scheme.

While I'm not exactly a huge Wal-Mart fan, I'd be more than happy to see retail behemoth force Apple to lower its own DRM-free music prices. While Apple and EMI deserve credit for opening the door to legit sales of copy protection-free music, the decision to raise DRM-free prices on iTunes to $1.29/song (compared to the standard 99-cents-a-song price for copy-protected tunes) seems wrong-headed, at best.

Update: In even more DRM-free news, Engadget is reporting that Universal has launched its "test" with Rhapsody, offering a limited selection of DRM-free songs from its catalog for 99 cents a song (or 89 cents/song for Rhapsody subscribers).

Related:
Wal-Mart selling digital music free of copy curbs [Yahoo! News/Reuters]

Comments on DRM-Free Tunes on Sale at Wal-Mart

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by somebodys_here on Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    This will be very good for consumers everywhere. I'm waiting till iTunes songs are half price. (not gonna happen).

  • 2 Posted by klm_7 on Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    I wi----- unes had more songs, especially those "one-hit-wonders:" they have the band that did the hit, but not the actual song that made them famous. And yes, iTunes is overpriced, too.

  • 3 Posted by ashander2 on Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    just a FYI... on itunes... songs are only .99/a song. Not $1.29. So, this is not correct.

  • 5 Posted by noonecares435 on Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    but will the tracks be edited like the music they sell?

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 … Next Last

Post a Comment

Sign In to Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 
Quick Compare See All Favorite Gadgets
 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio

Site Map | Tour | Subscribe to Yahoo! Tech

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.