Reviewers: Palm Pre is "powerful" iPhone competitor, but "where are the apps?"

Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:14AM EDT

See Comments (20)

The first reviews of Palm's hotly anticipated new smartphone are in, and—for the most part, anyway—they're raves, with reviewers calling the sleek, touchscreen handset perhaps the strongest iPhone competitor so far. But they're also calling out the Pre's Achilles heel: Its sparse selection of apps.

Wall Street Journal tech guru Walt Mossberg writes that Apple and the iPhone "will get a powerful competitor" in the Pre (set to go on sale Saturday on Sprint for $199, with a two-year contract), which he praises for its "real physical [slide-out] keyboard," "stylish software" and "beautiful industrial design" that's "much better than that of the other two main iPhone-class contenders," the T-Mobile G1 and the BlackBerry Storm. Mossberg also lauds the Pre's "elegant new take on the multitouch user interface," which lets you swipe through a series of running applications as if you were flipping through a deck of cards.

That said, the Pre's "biggest disadvantage," writes Mossberg, is its undernourished app store, which has "only about a dozen apps" versus the tens of thousands available for the iPhone. Even worse, he notes, Palm has only released development kits to "a small group of developers," so it could be awhile before Palm's "sorely lacking" app selection begins to approach iPhone levels.

Over at the New York Times, David Pogue
calls the Pre "an elegant, joyous, multitouch smartphone" that is, essentially, the "iPhone remixed." The handset (which is a bit shorter than the iPhone, if a bit thicker) is "exactly the right size" and is "more comfortable as a phone" than the iPhone, while Palm's new WebOS platform is "attractive, fluid, and exciting."

However, he notes that the Pre's tiny keys make the BlackBerry's QWERTY keypad feel like "Texas by comparison" (although the "domed key shapes" and "sticky rubber key surfaces" make the keypad preferable to "typing on glass"). Also, "battery life is the Pre's heartbreaker," although Pogue notes that the Pre's battery is at least user-replaceable, unlike on the iPhone.

Finally, Edward Baig at USA Today agrees that the Pre "stacks up ell against Apple's blockbuster device, and in some ways even surpasses it." He heaps praise on the Pre's "excellent" mobile Web browser and says it has "a better camera than the iPhone" (although he admits "that's not saying much"). Baig had better luck with battery life than either Mossberg or Pogue, noting that he "got through most days without having to charge the Pre."

But as with Mossberg, Baig asks "Where are the apps?," and notes that Palm is "moving slowly in opening up the Pre platform" to third-party developers. Another bummer that Baig calls out: No visual voicemail.

So, how many of you are ready to take the leap and snap up a Pre? Worried about the lack of apps? Think it's an iPhone killer?

Comments on Reviewers: Palm Pre is "powerful" iPhone competitor, but "where are the apps?"

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by alkasi2000 on Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:59AM EDT Report Abuse

    To be honest, it looks like one heck of a phone. But since it has such a small selection of apps, and being that its not sold by Apple, I don't think it's anywhere near an iPhone killer.

  • 3 Posted by angeleastlos on Thu Jun 4, 2009 3:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    im sure apple has something up its sleeve set to be unleashed this coming monday, something that will make the pre look more like the g1 and storm

  • 4 Posted by mattsk4000 on Thu Jun 4, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    Apps are very important. I got the iPod Touch when it first came out back with verision 1.1.1 (way before the app store or any update ever came out, were talking out for a week) and I loved it but I got bored of it after a while. What got me into it again was the app store! I use it constantly now so that is very important. BUT my biggest problem with the Pre is not in the phone but in the carrier. SPRINT is not known for good service. It is known to be horrible with service. And a phone can't be good when you can't get signal! The Pre needs to come to Verizon! It would work because both Sprint and Verizon are CDMA which means the Pre is a CDMA phone so it would work on Verizon!!!!

  • 5 Posted by middlenamefrank on Thu Jun 4, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    One of my favorite things about the old-school Palm OS was the availability of hundreds of apps, many priced at just a dollar or two, which was driven by the affordable (even free) development systems. I hope Palm doesn't disappoint us here.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.