News Corp. exec: Hulu "could" start charging for videos

Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:03AM EDT

See Comments (33)

Streaming video site Hulu is a hit with viewers thanks to its free, ad-supported TV shows and movies, but a key executive at News Corp.—one of Hulu's primary backers, not to mention owner of the Fox TV network—thinks that charging visitors for at least some of Hulu's shows is, "over time," a "logical thing."

Daily Finance blogger Jeff Bercovici reports that Jonathan Miller, the new head of News Corp's digital division, floated the idea during a conference earlier this week.

Bercovici notes that Miller is still getting his feet wet at Hulu, and that the concept of charging for Hulu videos is "merely his own speculation" for now. Nevertheless, when asked whether for-pay Hulu videos is really a possibility, Miller said "the answer could be yes ... it seems to me that over time that could be a logical thing."

Miller didn't go into any more detail about exactly which—or how many—of Hulu's free video offerings he thinks could end up with price tags attached, although as Bercovici writes, Miller's "chief digital officer" title at News Corp. guarantees "his definition of what's logical is likely to carry a lot of weight."

The idea seems to fly in the face of the whole idea behind Hulu, which owes its popularity to the fact that its videos—including episodes of hit shows like "The Office," "30 Rock," "24," and "The Daily Show"—are free. And judging from the growing number of ads peppering Hulu's shows and movies, it appears that sponsors are catching on, as well.

So, what do you think, Hulu fans: Would you keep on streaming even if the site began charging for its shows (or some of them, anyway)? Think for-pay videos on Hulu are simply inevitable, or should the service try to make a go of it purely with revenue from advertisers?

Related:
Soon, you'll have to pay for Hulu [Daily Finance]

Comments on News Corp. exec: Hulu "could" start charging for videos

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 2 Posted by dgutf on Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:35AM EDT Report Abuse

    If they expand their series offerings, perhaps going back in the archives and bringing back shows that arent necessarily available on DVD, I personally wouldnt mind paying for those episodes. But the pay per episode price of $1.99 for shows that are currently available on DVD makes little sense. Why would you pay the equivalent of $50 for a season of a show? If you're a big fan of a show, would you really only download one or two episodes of it? Probably not. You would want a whole season. At least IMHO.

  • 3 Posted by scottiecordes on Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:51AM EDT Report Abuse

    Good points dgutf. However, one might pay the $1.99 if they missed just one or two episodes of an ongoing show. I know I would have coughed it up if I missed an episode of 24 this year. With that said, I think Hulu would take a seriou----- if they started charging. I know I blew off a couple episodes of Dollhouse when it aired, knowing I could watch them on Hulu. Hulu and ABC.com are a godsend for people like me who travel for a living, and do not have access to a DVR (or a VCR for that matter). If they start charging, I would not intentionally miss a show knowing I could stream it the next day for free.

  • 5 Posted by zytkiewicz on Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:58AM EDT Report Abuse

    I would not buy any shows from Hulu. If I kept visiting I would only watch the free shows. Now what might make sense for them to do is continue to offer the free ad supported videos and the option to pay and not have ads.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.