DTV transition hits Friday: Are you ready?

Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:54PM EDT

See Comments (122)

After 10 years of planning and a four-month delay imposed by Congress, the long-awaited shutoff of analog TV signals in the U.S. is finally upon us—yet according to a recent survey, more than 2.8 million households still aren't ready. Find out if your TV will go dark come Friday.

We've been hearing about the impending transition to digital TV for months—nay, years now, and I'm sure regular Yahoo! Tech readers can't wait for it to hurry up and happen so we can move on to a new topic.

But clearly, millions of Americans still haven't gotten the message. Are you one of them? If so, read on. (And if you're sick of hearing about the DTV transition, by all means—feel free to head next door to argue over the iPhone vs. the Palm Pre.)

Still here? Good. So, what does the DTV transition entail, exactly? Simple: The nation's 1,800-odd television stations, in cooperation with (and after pressure from) the FCC, have agreed to abandon their analog UHF and VHF channels for new, digital frequencies. Indeed, hundreds of TV stations have already made the switch.

And why, you ask? Well, for one thing, digital take up far less bandwidth than analog to transmit (basically) the same- or better-quality signal, opening up large swaths of wireless spectrum for exciting new technologies, such as ultra-speedy 4G broadband and more robust channels of communication for rescue workers. (Of course, wireless communication giants such as AT&T and Verizon Wireless also stand to benefit.)

What does all mean to you, in the short term? On the one hand, you can expect sharper TV signals—even HD, if you have an HDTV—and more channels, provided you have the right equipment.

On the other hand, older analog TVs with over-the-air antennas won't pick up the new digital signals—and if you haven't taken steps by this Friday, no more TV shows for you.

Congress already delayed the original DTV transition date from Feb. 17 to Friday, June 12, over concerns that too many people weren't ready for the changeover, but that grace period is rapidly drawing to a close. Meanwhile, about 2.8 million households still aren't prepared for the switch, according to Nielsen.

OK, so how do you know if you're ready for the DTV transition? Follow along with this checklist to find out.

Do you subscribe to a satellite TV service, like DirecTV and EchoStar, or cable—and in the case of cable, are you using a set-top box?
If your answer is "yes," relax. The DTV transition applies only to over-the-air TV signals, not satellite or cable services. That said …

Are you a basic-cable subscriber who doesn't have a cable box?
If so, then listen up. Most of the big cable companies are busy migrating all their old analog channels to digital (a process that, strictly speaking, has nothing to do with the FCC's DTV transition program), which means that if you're watching cable on an older, analog TV and you're not using a cable set-top box provided by your carrier, the tuner in your TV might become useless if your carrier decides to go all digital.

That's the bad news; the good news is that cable carriers have agreed to rent digital converter boxes for free, for one year, if you still want to watch basic cable on your analog TV. (Note that these cable boxes are different from the ones needed to receiver over-the-air digital TV signals.) Also, cable operators have agreed to give subscribers 30 days notice before shutting off analog service. Not sure what your carrier's plans are? Then call customer service and ask.

Are you getting your TV signals from an over-the-air antenna?
If so, then the DTV transition may well affect you; read on.

If you are using an over-the-air antenna, does your TV have a digital tuner?
The vast majority of TV sets built after July 1, 2007, come with digital (ATSC) tuners, which are capable of receiving digital over-the-air TV signals. If you bought your TV after June 1, 2007, and it's larger than 13 inches, most likely it has an ATSC tuner installed—and that means you're good to go. The FCC mandate for built-in ATSC tuners stretches back even further for bigger TVs; for example, sets larger than 25 inches were required to come with digital tuners as of July 1, 2006, while the magic date for TVs 36 inches or bigger was July 1, 2005.

OK, but what if you have an older, analog-only TV and an over-the-air antenna?
If so, then your TV will go dark on Friday—that is, unless you have a digital converter box. Dozens of makes and models are available at retailers such as Best Buy, Kmart, Radio Shack, Sears, Target, and Wal-Mart (you can find a nearby retailer here), and they generally cost in the $40-60 range. Setting up the box is relatively easy; just plug it in, attached your antenna leads to the box, and the connect a coaxial cable from the box to your TV. (More help is here.)

Can't afford a digital converter box?
The FCC has set up a coupon program for anyone who needs help paying for a box; you can apply online, and each household is eligible for two $40 coupons. Keep in mind, however, that it'll take a week or longer for the coupons to arrive in the mail, so if you haven’t applied yet, you won't get your coupons before Friday.

What about older antennas—will they receive digital signals?
Theoretically, yes—although if your antenna is aligned improperly or you're not getting a strong signal, you might not get a picture. For help aligning your antenna and other invaluable tips, check out AntennaWeb.org.

Related:
The FCC's DTV transition information site

Comments on DTV transition hits Friday: Are you ready?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 46 Posted by celinda1008 on Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    This transition has cost us hundreds of dollars. Our not-so-old vhs and dvd players won't record without converter boxes attached to them too. And we have small tvs in bedrooms so the paultry two $40 coupons have done little to offset the cost of this grandiose idea. And this when money is all ready tight from the economy. It is shameful.

  • 47 Posted by mkay5150@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    As of tomorrow, I'm free of the 'idiot box',I plan on catching up on all my reading the rest of the year.And since 'grisom' left CSI,there's not a whole lot worth watching on t.v. anyhow ~ :)

  • 48 Posted by dawntassin@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well, talk about procrastinating. I'm hooking up my TV to digital box now. Never thought about my dresser being too heavy to move to get to the wall plug. Bummer.

  • 49 Posted by rkruczynski@att.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    2.8 million households of an estimated 111.5 million is 2.5%. 97.5% being held up by laggards who will never be ready unless it is done for them. I say let them sit in front of darkened screens.

  • 50 Posted by camiz@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree deathrave 1954. There is no way on God's green earth I'll ever pay for TV so guesswhat ~ for the past 4 months I haven't turned on either of my TVs - my 1981 analog or my 2 year old digital. I have a converter box, 2 new antennas and guesswhat - only 1 channel comes in clear. All the others are messed up. I was down to watching 3 shows a week anyways and I found I don't miss TV at all, in fact, I don't know how I ever had the time to watch TV before, cause now - I don't have any time left for something that's a waste of time. Do yourselves a favor - try going without TV for a month - you'll never miss it.

  • 51 Posted by knightone58@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    I cannot believe some of these people,they have had how much time to prepare for this.Those converter boxes must be junk if these people cannot get a signal from 20 miles away.I have a digital tv and it gets like 19 stations on an outside vhf uhf antenna.

  • 52 Posted by josephloveland@att.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    You know this sounds well and good, but what about the Churches that can not afford the equipment to broadcast? I remember before my mother died she was very troubled about this and it is something that really needs to be looked into. It sounds good to move forward, but I know someone will spout the Seperation of Church and State but doesn't this put the folk that attended those churches to no longer worship if they were unable to attend due to health reasons, like myself. Think about it!!!!

  • 53 Posted by lowellfamily@bellsouth.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    i have a converter box and antenna but the analog signal was stronger on all the channels i could pick up .now i get half of what i could and the picture keeps stopping and starting. i don't think it's that great. and with times as they are . i' not going to spend the money on cable or dish. ihope they don't do radio the same way.

  • 54 Posted by whyme2335@att.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is BS, the people in the rual areas will not be able to receive the digital broadcasts, now I can get nine channels, on friday, two, we can only get two channels of DTV in our area. So the government has screwed us again. Its time for the government to butt out of our lives.

  • 55 Posted by davidmac1556@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    So those who have rabbit ears on top of an analog TV will now become "victims" and will file claims for billions of taxpayer dollars. Obama will go after the cable/satellite companies and make them pay for their evil ways. Obama wants more private corporations to hang on his wall in the Oval Office.

  • 56 Posted by daniel_j_kinsman@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a digital television and bought a digital antenna and don't need cable or satellite. I have free TV. I also have digital TV for PC for a one time charge and no monthly fees. It's called DTV4PC. Many cable channels such as Sci Fi and so on. One time charge of 44.95 Oh DTV4PC on my computer gives me over 1500 channels.

  • 58 Posted by caesar.abcarius@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    Better quality signal = better picture? Yes, but only at a short distance. The analog signal has a much further reach and is much more resilient to weather and other interference, resulting in sound and picture even if additional distortion exists. The digital signal breaks the picture down, breaks the sound down, resulting in a non continuous movement and non continuous sound, loosing the signal with a completely blue screen for some time. Looks clear, but no movie. Better quality experience for the customer? I think not. This is forcing the little guy that lives too far to go to cable or satellite with a monthly subscription. What a rip off!!!

  • 59 Posted by osloviking75 on Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is so stupid. Why convert digital signal back to analog just to see tv. There may be more stations. Some say it's to free up space for police,ambulance, and other emergegency workers. Funny thing is most emergency departments are already switched to digital. Just another way for the government to get our money.

  • 60 Posted by monko12105 on Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    The Answer to all your government problems: REVOLUTIONARY WAR 2

  • 62 Posted by snjo242@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    How can our government brak our con. right to the persuite of happyness by making us who cant aford cable or dish ned work by taking free tv way from us and make us get something we dont have the money for.There are those of us who are to pore for cable tv some of us dont have a tv and are lucky to just lessen to a radio if we can buy one yet the rich get what they want because they have the money. If it where left up to me I would make the rich have to do whitout for a year or two and maybe then they would see what it is like not to have anything and try to live off of $400 to $500 a month in just bills and that is for a family of 3 and as for our government they well they need locked up and the key lost for good

  • 63 Posted by donaldwells511 on Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    and in 1903 the first gasoline driven airplane flew....and if you are using "rabbit ears" nnnot the ones from real rabbit.."silly Goose"..and the not spruce goose..then the article should be read on Bill Gates computer if you have or crave to have one to do it with...thank you and "ta ta"...for now.

  • 64 Posted by sallilu26@sbcglobal.net on Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    I sure hope it fixes all the glitches on my higher hd channels. I can' even listen to music channels without it cuttin out all the time. ugh! and don't tell me it is all sunspots.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.