IRS: Company cell phone + personal calls = more taxes for you

Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:25PM EDT

See Comments (427)

Make any personal calls on that company cell phone? That's a "fringe benefit" of your job, according to a 20-year-old law, and the IRS is looking to collect.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the IRS wants to step up enforcement of the 1989 law, which holds that employees who make personal calls on a company cell phone are getting a "fringe benefit" from their employers—a benefit that should count as taxable income.

The law has been "long ignored" by employees and employers alike, according to the Journal, namely because most companies don't have the time or the inclination to tabulate exactly how many minutes you're on the phone with clients versus how often you're gabbing with friends and family.

But now, the IRS is floating a couple of proposals to make compliance easier—for employers, anyway. One would be to simply treat 25 percent of your company cell phone bill as a "fringe"—and therefore taxable—benefit, the Journal reports. Or, an employer could use "statistical sampling" to guesstimate how many of your cell minutes are work-related and which aren't.

OK, but what if you swear on a stack of bibles that you rarely, if ever, use your company phone for personal calls? That's fine, the IRS says—but you'll have to produce separate work and personal cell phone bills to prove it.

Think it's a crazy idea? Apparently the IRS is thinking it over and will make a decision by September, the Journal reports.

Meanwhile, guess who's on your side against the IRS? The big cell phone carriers, who (according to the WSJ story) are worried that companies will drop employee cell phone contracts if the IRS goes ahead with its proposal. (Instead, employers might simply reimburse you for business calls made on your personal phone.)

So, quick show of hands: How many of you have a company-issued cell phone, and if so, do you use it for personal calls? And should personal calls count as a "fringe," taxable benefit? Or should the IRS allow for (at the very least) "minimal personal use" of company phones, especially given that bosses often expect cell-toting employees to be in contact at all times?

Related:
Tax Man's Target: The Mobile Phone [The Wall Street Journal]

Comments on IRS: Company cell phone + personal calls = more taxes for you

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by westofphilly on Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    Surprise. Welcome to the flip side of the economic stimulus.

  • 2 Posted by artfreitas on Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    The IRS' thinking is flawed on this issue. many businesses have a cell plan that has a set number of minutes per month for a fixed fee. As long as the total number of minutes is not exceeded, the cost of providing employee cell phones doesn't change. So as long as the number of monthly minutes is not exceeded, any personal calls made on the phone have zero incremental cost. If there's no cost incurred by the company there will be no additional deductions from taxable income as a result of the personal call Maybe the IRS should focus on something with a little higher value and importance instead of trying to shake down small businesses for more tax money

  • 3 Posted by jocowger on Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:07PM EDT Report Abuse

    I don't, but know many who do. Many, if not all, had their own personal phone before the company issued their own. It is a hassle to carry 2 phones. I remember carrying a phone and a pager. Someone I work with used to carry 2 phones and a pager (the pager worked with our trouble ticket system) Once they figured out how to page to the phone, one appendage was removed. Treating as a fringe is probably cheaper that having a separate personal phone. But rulings coming so late in the year will mess up a lot of people, and the companies. The IRS should go after the federal employees who don't pay taxes. They'd make a bunch more money that way.

  • 4 Posted by f_l_dyke on Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is an example of the "gains from increased enforcement in the tax code" that Obama was touting to pay for his healthcare proposal. If you voted for Obama and are unhappy with this development, do the world a favor and don't vote again.

  • 5 Posted by krumpy_14 on Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    Spend spend spend is of course followed with tax tax tax. Or deficits and higher interest rates. Or both! YAY! Obamanomics at work.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.