IRS: Company cell phone + personal calls = more taxes for you

Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:25PM EDT

See Comments (427)

Make any personal calls on that company cell phone? That's a "fringe benefit" of your job, according to a 20-year-old law, and the IRS is looking to collect.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the IRS wants to step up enforcement of the 1989 law, which holds that employees who make personal calls on a company cell phone are getting a "fringe benefit" from their employers—a benefit that should count as taxable income.

The law has been "long ignored" by employees and employers alike, according to the Journal, namely because most companies don't have the time or the inclination to tabulate exactly how many minutes you're on the phone with clients versus how often you're gabbing with friends and family.

But now, the IRS is floating a couple of proposals to make compliance easier—for employers, anyway. One would be to simply treat 25 percent of your company cell phone bill as a "fringe"—and therefore taxable—benefit, the Journal reports. Or, an employer could use "statistical sampling" to guesstimate how many of your cell minutes are work-related and which aren't.

OK, but what if you swear on a stack of bibles that you rarely, if ever, use your company phone for personal calls? That's fine, the IRS says—but you'll have to produce separate work and personal cell phone bills to prove it.

Think it's a crazy idea? Apparently the IRS is thinking it over and will make a decision by September, the Journal reports.

Meanwhile, guess who's on your side against the IRS? The big cell phone carriers, who (according to the WSJ story) are worried that companies will drop employee cell phone contracts if the IRS goes ahead with its proposal. (Instead, employers might simply reimburse you for business calls made on your personal phone.)

So, quick show of hands: How many of you have a company-issued cell phone, and if so, do you use it for personal calls? And should personal calls count as a "fringe," taxable benefit? Or should the IRS allow for (at the very least) "minimal personal use" of company phones, especially given that bosses often expect cell-toting employees to be in contact at all times?

Related:
Tax Man's Target: The Mobile Phone [The Wall Street Journal]

Comments on IRS: Company cell phone + personal calls = more taxes for you

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 46 Posted by ian_tudor25 on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    another example of unnecessary government beuraucracy stealin our moneys or taking our freedoms ...our founding fathers must be rolling over in their graves....all this taxation without representation....a revolution must take place get rid of these government ponies the irs the federal reserve etc its all got to go

  • 47 Posted by willmarsee on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    artfreitas - I thought the same thing but wallaaaaa... if I use a work issue cell phone to make a personal call, I get taxed. Needless to say, the cell phone was turned in as soon as they told us that would happen. That was sometime last year.

  • 48 Posted by wxyzabcdefgh on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    QUOTE This is an example of the "gains from increased enforcement in the tax code" that Obama was touting to pay for his healthcare proposal Ha ha ha hilarious. Yes, we should all stand up and tell the government to f**k off with affordable healthcare accessible to all. What we really want more than life saving quality care is some free cell phone minutes. What a Joke!

  • 49 Posted by hsinghasr63 on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    TAXING THE PERSONAL CALL ON COMPANY PHONE MAY REDUCE THE EFFICIENCY OF WORKERS AND HOW ARE YOU GOING TO KEEP THE ACCOUNT. IT IS PENNY WISE POUND FOOLISH. AS AN EMPLOYER I DO NOT HAVE TIME TO TRACK THIS EXPENSE. I PERSONALLY DO NOT THINK, IT IS GOOD IDEA, I PERSONALLY THINK IT IS ROTTEN. IDEA

  • 50 Posted by jamyardie on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    All cellphone issued by a company for company use should be taxed. And where an employer pays an employee for the usage of his/her personal cellphone whether for work or pleasure, said cellphone should be considered a fringe benefit and should also be taxed. Same if an employer provide housing for a employee. May be nickel and dime, but there is no reason some employees should benefit by getting an extra $200.00 or more in their pocket per week per cellphone, while others have to pay out of their own pocket. Way too much corruption and cronism in the workplace with regards to who get what base on friendship levels.

  • 51 Posted by robert.hughes6477 on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    Does the IRS have anything better to do? All my family has Verizon; we do Verizon to Verizon calls which are no cost for within the network.... this would be a very complex set of IRS rules to accomodate all the different plans etc.. Plus I pay for the phone bill then expense it ... how are they going to regulate that...?

  • 52 Posted by slow_steamer on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    Spend spend spend is of course followed with deficit deficit deficit. YAY! Regan/Bushonomics at work.

  • 53 Posted by jlhns on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    Fat chance, but let's just put the IRS out of business with the Fair Tax. www.fairtax.org

  • 54 Posted by progigz on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    DON'T PENALIZE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES. I work for a civil agency that requires its employees to be reachable -- if not "on call" -- at any point, 24/7. Our basic functions -- ie. standard operating procedures -- require us to utilize job-provided mobile phones during our daily tours of duty. Whether individuals inappropriately use those phones for personal calls is a completely separate issue. I, for one, carry an additional, personal mobile phone, as well.

  • 55 Posted by celtic451 on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I know, stop spending hundreds of billions of OUR money in Iraq then you wouldn't have to go after already financially struggling taxpayers for 100 bucks a month.

  • 56 Posted by friulliguy on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    why did Geisner not pay penalties nor interest... Big wigs in Congress get free haircuts, etc...let them take the cut first! people should just give up their phones...make phone companies cut their prices...to make up the difference... times are tough

  • 57 Posted by controll2012 on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    My company doesn't even give me a cell phone, yet constantly calls me about work related things. Do I get to write off 90% of my cell phone bill because its a business expense? The only 'Change' this country needs right now is to get rid of the current regieme.

  • 58 Posted by altofree on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is one of the ways we are going to pay for the stimulus package. I wonder what's next?

  • 59 Posted by vleopold@att.net on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    If I weren't on the road away from home working on behalf of my employer, I wouldn't incur some of my "personal" phone calls that if I were at home at night, wouldn't require cellphone calls. Also, if my employer just paid me a higher salary, I wouldn't mind taking care of the entire cell phone bill myself.

  • 60 Posted by lms264t on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    Tax the CEO's who use Blackberry's to book private jets, make dinner reservations, book luxurt vacations, etc. at 50%. That tax and a 50% tax on their income should bring in plenty of money for the IRS.

  • 61 Posted by koerners2003 on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    Personal use of the Internet on company time is next...

  • 62 Posted by untouchabletoo on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think it will be way to hard to work this one out. I have a Verizon personal plan, and the wife has Verizon business plan. All our mobile to mobile calls are free and included - no cost to anyone. How can you account for this "benefit"? Without my personal plan, this deal doesn't exisit so why I can't I claim it's 100% personally paid for? There are so many unique situations like this, it seems to be non-inforceable. Also, this is a 1989 law. Without looking at code, what kind of cellphone plans are they talking about.... Night at the Roxbury?

  • 65 Posted by jenniferhurtado on Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    How much would it cost to push this proposal through and what gains could possibly be made by taxing, what I'm assuming, is a small percentage of the population that has company cell phones? How many "enforcements" are we going to begin seeing?

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.