Vudu TV Set-Top Box: 5,000 Movies, Instantly

Thu Sep 6, 2007 12:03PM EDT

See Comments (173)

Want a collection of 5,000 movies that you can start watching immediately, at the press of a button? The Vudu set-top box just might be the answer, and it'll arrive on store shelves in a matter of weeks.

I blogged about Vudu back in April; now that we're closer to the launch date, more details have emerged, and David Pogue of the New York Times even has a hands-on review. According to Pogue, the $400 set-top box boasts impressive, DVD-level quality (competitors such as Apple TV and the Xbox Video Marketplace suffer from sub-DVD image quality with their standard-def offerings), an easy-to-use remote, an Ethernet port (no need for a PC), and a 250GB hard drive, capable of storing 100 full movies. Videos start the moment you click "play"—that's because the Vudu stores the first 30 seconds of all available movies locally, and downloads chunks of movies from other Vudu users (see my original post for more details). While the $400 price tag is a bit pricey, there's no monthly subscription fee; you can rent movies for $2 to $4 (with a 24-hour viewing window) or buy videos for $15 to $20.

Sounds cool, but of course, the Vudu will live and die according to its selection of movies, which (according to Pogue, at least) is a bit spotty. Sure, plenty of hits are available, including "300" and "Blades of Glory," but some recent titles, such as "The Departed," are missing, and there are plenty of Z-grade stinkers. That said, Vudu execs say they hope to have more than 10,000 titles, including HD movies, available in the coming months.

Related:
High-Speed Video Store in the Living Room [The New York Yimes; registration required]

Comments on Vudu TV Set-Top Box: 5,000 Movies, Instantly

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 46 Posted by blasphemous_rumors_dm on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    Not overly impressed. $400 dollars would require me to rent the equivelent of 200 movie titles. No subscription fee is cool but rental charges still apply so unless they find a way to get the price tag down I will not be running to the store anytime soon for one of these.

  • 47 Posted by ulfniemi on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    Must be bad quality 2,5Gb/movie . A full DVD is 8.4 :-(

  • 48 Posted by dotgoner2004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yea, I gotta have Blades of Glory NOW dammit! This is a toy for people with too much money and too little impulse control who like bad movies.

  • 49 Posted by dark3epu on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    They should've gone the monthly subscription route and have new content continuously added, especially HD content. Then they would have something. Have a spotty collection of movies with no promise of new content (especially without a monthly subscription) for $400 isn't going to sell IMO.

  • 51 Posted by benny.da.martin@verizon.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    To thomasjholland, mtclifford1976 and others that want porn: get a life. The world doesn't revolve around your masturbation fetish.

  • 52 Posted by naubatrai15 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why didn't mention dimensions. Is it easy to carry in the haand bag? NaubatRai

  • 53 Posted by kev_and_tara on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    Obsolete before it even hits the shelf! No native 1080p output. Last time I checked, most people I know already have HD televisions capable of higher resolutions than this box can output.

  • 54 Posted by reddog_stiner on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    If it keeps me from having to see GW Bush on my TV EVER its well worth it

  • 55 Posted by dmginphnx63 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Bleh!!!,if it does'nt come with all versions of Blade Runner, including "The Final Cut" & the rare "workprint" version, who cares..I'll stick with my good ole DVD's till I get a PS 3.

  • 56 Posted by khrishna on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    I already have a DVD player and a Netflix account. Why would I want this? Instant access to only 5k movies (Netflix has over 85k) isn't enough to push me to buy a $400 box and sheck out $2 - $4 per movie to "rent" on top of that. I just don't see the appeal here.

  • 57 Posted by sainthadeswebcreate on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    so.. how much cut do the movie industries actually get from this? I smell 'pirates' of the carribeians

  • 58 Posted by xxbtrainagamexx on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    ...this is ridiculous. KEEP DVDS OUT LONGER. DVDS ARE BETTERRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.

  • 60 Posted by redhia on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    hmm..that's no cool at all..i live in a country where a pirated DVD will costs you for less than a dollar..so, why bother? ;p

  • 61 Posted by sggray1978 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    To 37 - this is no upgrade to your DVD "machine". Stay with the DVD player and save yourself $400. To 30 - if you will read the article it will answer your question. It says that the TUVU stores the first 30 seconds of all its movies and downloads the rest when you start them.

  • 62 Posted by markrennie_satguy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why would I spend 400 dollars to be able to rent movies from home? I'll pay 400 dollars (one time fee)to be able to view all those movies, but 400 sounds a little pricey for a the equivalent of a membership fee

  • 63 Posted by john38119 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    24 hour viewing period is gonna kill it. Say you come home from work and start to watch at 8 at night, but don't fini----- . So the next night at 8, you have to pay again? I don't think so.

  • 64 Posted by mektare on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    A feature that allows families to share home videos would have been really cool. And that would have compensated for fewer movie titles Vudu has to offer initially. Well, it will come eventually... i think so.

  • 65 Posted by tawolfen69_2001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    The first 30-seconds of video being stored locally is cool feature, but getting the rest of the movie from other users makes it look like a Peer-to-Peer Sharing Network ,which the RIAA and the Movie Industry has been trying to shut down. Of course, this also leads to the question of whether or not the unit can be hacked into.

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.