Camera-less Phones in Demand

Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:37PM EDT

See Comments (6)

In this day and age of cell phones jam-packed with every conceivable feature, why in the world would anyone release a handset without a camera? That's what several readers asked me after my post about the rumored BlackBerry 8830, which will supposedly come with a full QWERTY keypad, a trackball, and 3G access—but no camera. If you're also puzzled by the apparent oversight, just ask anyone who toils 40 hours a week in a large corporate office, a courthouse, or even a gym, where camera phones are a no-no.

In short, more and more corporate and private entities are cracking down on camera phones—so many, in fact, that RIM bigwig Mike Lazaridis actually called the BlackBerry 8800's lack of a camera a "feature." As consultant Alan Reiter points out on his blog, there are many reasons for camera phone bans: some companies are concerned about security and corporate espionage, while courthouses don't want anyone surreptitiously snapping pictures or recording video of court proceedings. Of course, there's another issue that crops up, especially at health clubs: businesses worried about people snapping "inappropriate" pictures or videos of employees or patrons. And before you cry foul over your First Amendment rights, keep in mind that when you step foot in a business, you're on private property, which means the owners and/or proprietors are free to show you the door if you start taking pictures. (There are exceptions, of course, such as for photojournalists covering breaking news.) Of course, you could always disable the camera on your phone, but just try telling that to the bailiff at jury duty. Bye-bye, cellie.

With the all the "no camera phone" rules taking effect, it's no wonder that there's a burgeoning market for handsets without cameras. Of course, many bare-bones phones come without cameras, but there are plenty of high-end options, including the BlackBerry 8800 and the rumored 8830, along with several camera-less versions of the Palm Treos (check with your carrier) and the latest HP iPaqs (ditto).

Related:
RIM says no camera in BlackBerry 8800 is a "feature" for corporations [Reiter's Camera Phone Report]
Report: RIM Preps CDMA/GSM BlackBerry 8830

Comments on Camera-less Phones in Demand

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by jim.pease on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm surprized that people don't understand why a cameraless phone wouldn't be a viable purchase option. I have a need for a lot of features on a high-end cell phone but a camera is not one of them.

  • 2 Posted by c5inla on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    I already have a camera and I can't make phone calls on the darn thing. What's the deal with that? A camera in a phone makes as much sense as a LCD TV on the refrig door. Anyway, I have more than enough pictures of the inside of my pocket and my girlfriend has plenty of pictures of the inside of her purse.

  • 3 Posted by nosrednakram on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    There's also a huge demand for this among employees of certain DoD installations. I've been searching for a good cameraless cell phone since my Samsung flip-phone died. I couldn't find a new phone that wasn't a downgrade, so I re-activated an even older Ericsson T68i on a Cingular Pre-Paid plan. For nearly a year I've been waiting in vain for something better to come along.

  • 4 Posted by warren561 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have nothing against camera phones. I think they're a marvel of technology, especially as the resolution is getting to be almost as good as a real digital camera. However, there are many of us who are not permitted to have a camera phone in our workplace. In an 8 hour workday that's roughly 1/3 of our lives where our phones must remain locked inside our cars (or for commuters, left at home). Is it too much to ask the manufacturers to provide identical phones with and without a camera? I'd be willing to pay a few dollars extra for a phone with all the other features (Bluetooth, MP3 player, etc...) without a camera.

  • 5 Posted by vtcc93 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    My wife and I both work for DoD and yep, no camera phones. I was thrilled about the BB 8830 and spent an hour on release day at Verizon waiting in line to buy one. Then the bill ($99.00 for voice, plus $45/phone for data). You guessed it, no BB for me. Now I am back on the hunt for a decent VERIZON phone without a camera that has bluetooth. Does anyone have a suggestion? I have literally looked for a year and a half. Getting tired of it

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.