Fri Sep 7, 2007 8:44AM EDT
See Comments (269)
Everyone oohed and aahed at the new iPods during their recent unveiling in San Francisco, but make no mistake—there are some formidable iPod competitors out there, and they've been quietly gaining ground on Apple's iconic players. Is it time to stray from the pack and grab a non-iPod MP3 player?
I recently had a chance to review the latest iPods (save the iPod Touch, which is set to arrive in a few weeks), and I came away pretty impressed. That said, Apple isn't alone when it comes to making great MP3 players—and in some cases, it's slipping behind the times. Sure, the iPod has one of the best user interfaces I've ever seen for a consumer tech device, but such devices like the touch-screen Samsung Yepp YP-P2 (see below) aren't far behind. And while iTunes may have the biggest online music store out there, it doesn't offer the all-you-can-eat music subscription services available to its competitors. (Just mention that to a cocky iPod owner, and watch him/her turn green-eyed with envy.)
I've matched the new iPods against some of their toughest rivals (or at least, these are my non-iPod picks—feel free to flame me in the comments below), compared them spec-for-spec, and tipped the player that I think has the advantage. I haven't tested all these players in person, so I'm not declaring any winners just yet.
So, without further ado...let the competition begin!
iPod Touch vs. Samsung Yepp YP-P2
Price: The Touch goes for $400 (16GB) or $300 (8GB)—ouch. Samsung hasn't coughed up pricing for the YP-P2 (due in stores later this month, with 4GB and 8GB versions), but I'll wager that it'll be considerably cheaper. Advantage: Deuce (until Yepp details arrive).Overall advantage: iPod Touch
iPod Nano vs. Sansa View
Wireless: Nothing to say here; neither player does Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Advantage: Deuce. Overall advantage: Sansa View
iPod Classic vs. Zune
Price: The 30GB Zune benefits from a recent $50 price drop, bringing its sticker price down to $200. But while the cheapest iPod Classic is pricier at $250, it packs in a monster 80GB hard drive (a $350 160GB Classic is also available. In other words, the Classic gives you much more storage bang for the buck. Advantage: Classic.Overall advantage: iPod Classic
Post-game analysis: It looks like the new iPods edged their rivals in two of our three matches, but these weren't routs by any means—indeed, as more and better would-be iPod killers come to market, the battle for MP3 champion may well get blown wide open. So while the iPod may have the upper hand for now, I wouldn't feel too superior the next time you see someone grooving to tunes on a Yepp.
So, let's hear it: who still wants an iPod, and who's ready to jump ship (or who already has, for that matter)?
Note: I've updated this post to include the new Sansa View and add details from my hands-on review of the new iPods.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Why do reviews on products you haven't used? The new Sansa View, plays music, 16GB for $199. Advantage: Sansa.
Not that I think these reviews were biased towards apple products, but come on! is the zune the best match you could find to go up against the ipod classic? I haven't heard any comments about the zune that were not accompanied by chuckles. The Zen Vision:M is at least the ipod classic's equal. The Archos 605 WiFi would be a better match against the ipod touch, $200 for the 4GB, but it's got an expansion slot for SD cards upto 16GB The Nano looks like it would be ho-hum next to the new Creative Zen due out this month, larger screen & SD expansion slot. While I am in no way a fan of anything ipod, it is a great product. If only it weren't for being tied to itunes I'd probably own one. Non-ipod players offer much more choice, not only on where I get my media, but also in media format. Isn't choice good? especially when it's my choice and not Mr. Jobs P.S. I would run away from any player with an OLED display like the clix, at least until they can increase the display life to that of LCD/TFT displays.
I think this review is biased towards iPods/Apple. Some things that are important, such as navigation/user-friendliness should have been discussed here.
Let's be honest. The ipods have never been, nor are they now, top-of-class products. When they were first introduced, there were superior MP3 players on the market five years prior (Diamond Rio) not counting ever-cheaper storage capacities. Apple deserves a world of credit for bringing MP3 to the masses, whereas before it was restricted to tech-savvy people, but their genius is in being easy-to-use and "non-threatening", definitely not cutting edge.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by calcio22 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:16PM EDT Report Abuse
Until Apple gets off of its proprietary band-wagon you won't see me by an Apple media product. Disadvantage: Apple