Fri Sep 7, 2007 8:44AM EDT
See Comments (269)
Everyone oohed and aahed at the new iPods during their recent unveiling in San Francisco, but make no mistake—there are some formidable iPod competitors out there, and they've been quietly gaining ground on Apple's iconic players. Is it time to stray from the pack and grab a non-iPod MP3 player?
I recently had a chance to review the latest iPods (save the iPod Touch, which is set to arrive in a few weeks), and I came away pretty impressed. That said, Apple isn't alone when it comes to making great MP3 players—and in some cases, it's slipping behind the times. Sure, the iPod has one of the best user interfaces I've ever seen for a consumer tech device, but such devices like the touch-screen Samsung Yepp YP-P2 (see below) aren't far behind. And while iTunes may have the biggest online music store out there, it doesn't offer the all-you-can-eat music subscription services available to its competitors. (Just mention that to a cocky iPod owner, and watch him/her turn green-eyed with envy.)
I've matched the new iPods against some of their toughest rivals (or at least, these are my non-iPod picks—feel free to flame me in the comments below), compared them spec-for-spec, and tipped the player that I think has the advantage. I haven't tested all these players in person, so I'm not declaring any winners just yet.
So, without further ado...let the competition begin!
iPod Touch vs. Samsung Yepp YP-P2
Price: The Touch goes for $400 (16GB) or $300 (8GB)—ouch. Samsung hasn't coughed up pricing for the YP-P2 (due in stores later this month, with 4GB and 8GB versions), but I'll wager that it'll be considerably cheaper. Advantage: Deuce (until Yepp details arrive).Overall advantage: iPod Touch
iPod Nano vs. Sansa View
Wireless: Nothing to say here; neither player does Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Advantage: Deuce. Overall advantage: Sansa View
iPod Classic vs. Zune
Price: The 30GB Zune benefits from a recent $50 price drop, bringing its sticker price down to $200. But while the cheapest iPod Classic is pricier at $250, it packs in a monster 80GB hard drive (a $350 160GB Classic is also available. In other words, the Classic gives you much more storage bang for the buck. Advantage: Classic.Overall advantage: iPod Classic
Post-game analysis: It looks like the new iPods edged their rivals in two of our three matches, but these weren't routs by any means—indeed, as more and better would-be iPod killers come to market, the battle for MP3 champion may well get blown wide open. So while the iPod may have the upper hand for now, I wouldn't feel too superior the next time you see someone grooving to tunes on a Yepp.
So, let's hear it: who still wants an iPod, and who's ready to jump ship (or who already has, for that matter)?
Note: I've updated this post to include the new Sansa View and add details from my hands-on review of the new iPods.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
the Samsung P2 is so much better than an iTouch. yeah the iTouch has internet but the phone i have has internet and GPS and bluetooth so i have an iPhone equivalent all for just $250 still less.
The advantage should go to the classic, nano, and touch on music, because they can take songs downloaded off limewire, and you can just sync your whole library on iTunes rather then dragging them like you have to do on the Sansa.
Zunes have bigger screens, but the same resolution, so it's not as clear as the iPod, but bigger. Size vs Quality Your choice.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
266 Posted by rapmetal47 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:29PM EDT Report Abuse
Thank you, Mr. Ben Patterson for the lovely reviews. Keep it up!!!! BTW : I own 2 iPods and I love them both!!!