Fri Sep 7, 2007 8:44AM EDT
See Comments (269)
Everyone oohed and aahed at the new iPods during their recent unveiling in San Francisco, but make no mistake—there are some formidable iPod competitors out there, and they've been quietly gaining ground on Apple's iconic players. Is it time to stray from the pack and grab a non-iPod MP3 player?
I recently had a chance to review the latest iPods (save the iPod Touch, which is set to arrive in a few weeks), and I came away pretty impressed. That said, Apple isn't alone when it comes to making great MP3 players—and in some cases, it's slipping behind the times. Sure, the iPod has one of the best user interfaces I've ever seen for a consumer tech device, but such devices like the touch-screen Samsung Yepp YP-P2 (see below) aren't far behind. And while iTunes may have the biggest online music store out there, it doesn't offer the all-you-can-eat music subscription services available to its competitors. (Just mention that to a cocky iPod owner, and watch him/her turn green-eyed with envy.)
I've matched the new iPods against some of their toughest rivals (or at least, these are my non-iPod picks—feel free to flame me in the comments below), compared them spec-for-spec, and tipped the player that I think has the advantage. I haven't tested all these players in person, so I'm not declaring any winners just yet.
So, without further ado...let the competition begin!
iPod Touch vs. Samsung Yepp YP-P2
Price: The Touch goes for $400 (16GB) or $300 (8GB)—ouch. Samsung hasn't coughed up pricing for the YP-P2 (due in stores later this month, with 4GB and 8GB versions), but I'll wager that it'll be considerably cheaper. Advantage: Deuce (until Yepp details arrive).Overall advantage: iPod Touch
iPod Nano vs. Sansa View
Wireless: Nothing to say here; neither player does Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Advantage: Deuce. Overall advantage: Sansa View
iPod Classic vs. Zune
Price: The 30GB Zune benefits from a recent $50 price drop, bringing its sticker price down to $200. But while the cheapest iPod Classic is pricier at $250, it packs in a monster 80GB hard drive (a $350 160GB Classic is also available. In other words, the Classic gives you much more storage bang for the buck. Advantage: Classic.Overall advantage: iPod Classic
Post-game analysis: It looks like the new iPods edged their rivals in two of our three matches, but these weren't routs by any means—indeed, as more and better would-be iPod killers come to market, the battle for MP3 champion may well get blown wide open. So while the iPod may have the upper hand for now, I wouldn't feel too superior the next time you see someone grooving to tunes on a Yepp.
So, let's hear it: who still wants an iPod, and who's ready to jump ship (or who already has, for that matter)?
Note: I've updated this post to include the new Sansa View and add details from my hands-on review of the new iPods.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Note to the masses - who the heck buys tv shows when products exists using fair use (if you own you can have a back up of it) to convert videos to mobile devices? I personally have all my CD and DVDs on disk and with converters available I can take my favorites Sienfeld eps with me. So lets leave the DRM and the music and video stores out of the equation for these reviews; these should be independent of the product review. 2nd I like the nano over the sansa view, the screen actually resolves wide screen sources better than the sansa. If we are talking about video and music devices why isnt the arcos on here or was this review simply by an apple hater. Lets also talk about the format most people have there video files which are not wma. Using divx the contain can easily be avi or the popular ogg. Not to mention that H.264 is becoming popular too. I am going back to epinions where the real reviews are or cnet.com.
I DONT UNDERSTAND YOU SAID IT YOURSELF 3IN TO 2.5 WITH THE SAME CLARITY IN VIDEO HOW DOES THE CLASSIC HAVE ADVANTAGE? RITTLE ME THAT BATMAN
I just have to say I have had my iPod mini for 3+ years and it has never given me any problems. It may not be the nicest, but I see my friends with their MP3 that are supposed to be all fancy, and all the time they don't know how to work it or something. I love my iPod and I will always be a fan.
Without having all units to try in your hand, you've just wasted my time.
Oh yeah and on top of that any DMP can be used with any download service ie itunes napster etc... you just have to understand how these services work with DRM ;)
How about Ipod Shuffle vs. Creative Zen Stone Plus? I'm very pleased with my Stone. It's got more storage capacity than the shuffle, has a lcd screen, has support for more file types than the stone, and for about the same price.
Apple is still making the greatest mp3s. I have had others and none of them are any where close to the ipod in ease of use, capacity, quality, and overall performance. People just dont like them because they are expensive. In my eyes they are 100% worth the money.
OK get to the basics nowhere in the reveiw did you say which player had better sound quality wasn't even mentioned same gripe I have over cell phone reveiws which one is the best phone all the other stuff is by the way! So which one plays the best music!!
Cowon D2 is the best! Samsung T9 is okay.. (great considering its price)
Funny how they selectively chose not to compare the iCrock to the Creative Zen Vision:M, which is better than both the iCrock and Microsoft's crappy version of the iCrock.
Well, my opinion is that if non apple MP3 players are better than apple's MP3 players then why is it that Apple makes their MP3 players compatible to windows but non Apple MP3 players are not compatible with Apple. I would be more than happy to buy a non Apple product if it was better than the ipod but I use an Apple computer and it will do me no good to buy anything other than an ipod. Why can Microsoft be an inovative as to make a produck that is compatible. Seems to me that Apple is the bigger person in this. Just my two cents. A
technically if you think about it aple dominates the computer and mp3 world Microsoft dost make computers they only make the operation system now maney different PC companies are there in the world at least 20 and how many companies make apple 1 after you break down the profits and percentage of each between at least 20 companies apple has about 10% of all the computers dell of course is a strong leader in the PC world but once everyday users of computers realize they amazing advantages of MAC I think that the market will rise and as far as ipods go everyone love em and the people who dont are the ones who cant afford em
I will not stress the same point as other and continue to laud the Creative Zen Vision:M, but one thing I haven't seen mentioned is how its navigation is superior. Having to circle around on things like the Ipod and Zune just isn't natural movement. Also one complaint I've had against the Ipod and Macs in general in the past is the color, or lack thereof. While they are starting to change their look, who wants a product that looks like it belongs in an insane asylum with padded walls and a straitjacket? I'll even take a plain old metallic looking mp3 player over their sterile white one.
Even though reading this review, I will still stay strong and depart with these final words: Zunes for life! :D
ipods have always been status symbols, i do not think that anything is going to change that advantage: Apple
Personally, I've always been happy with Apple products, from the desktops to their iPods, for 20-some odd years. I'm relatively tech-savvy, but I really just want a product I can just use without having to consult a manual or anything. And that is the genius of Apple, made manifest with the iPod. They might not pack the most features, they might not be the cheapest, they might not have the newest fancy technology, but they are simply intuitive to use and they do what they are told without any user training. Advantage: Apple.
well i think iPod has the market hands down, because seriously, this market is practically run by the youth right? im pretty sure there are more kids then old people (no offense) and adults walkin around rocking out to their iPod. and since iPod has been the MP3 player of choice for the longest time with the youth, im sure it will be the "Boss" for a long time coming. im 15, and i thought that iPod was the only MP3 player device for the longest time. ive got an iPod 30gb video and i love it, and i would love to get my hands on an iPod Touch because it looks cool, and u can surf the internet on it. sorry Sony, LG, etc. im with iPod until they completely go down the drain.
Two things, you can use just about anything music or video-wise just by converting it into a format the iPod can read! And why rave about those subscription sites that allow you to download unlimited, if you choose to get rid of your subscription, your music library is GONE! Why not just buy them (cheap) and then keep them forever!??? Customer service with Apple is unequaled, for the guy who says his iPod broke within the first year, ever heard of a warranty? Apple will fix it for free with in the first year!
This article is almost pointless because it leaves out Creative products. It's like a luxury car comparison featuring Lexus vs. everthing but Mercedes. I've been using Creative mp3 players for years, and I won't consider switching over to Ipod. On a side note, I predict that in the near future Apple will successfully copyright the letter "I", and we'll all have to pay them whenever we write in the first person. You heard it here first!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46 Posted by sherriges on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:19PM EDT Report Abuse
I'm gonna stick with my nano.