Fri Sep 7, 2007 8:44AM EDT
See Comments (269)
Everyone oohed and aahed at the new iPods during their recent unveiling in San Francisco, but make no mistake—there are some formidable iPod competitors out there, and they've been quietly gaining ground on Apple's iconic players. Is it time to stray from the pack and grab a non-iPod MP3 player?
I recently had a chance to review the latest iPods (save the iPod Touch, which is set to arrive in a few weeks), and I came away pretty impressed. That said, Apple isn't alone when it comes to making great MP3 players—and in some cases, it's slipping behind the times. Sure, the iPod has one of the best user interfaces I've ever seen for a consumer tech device, but such devices like the touch-screen Samsung Yepp YP-P2 (see below) aren't far behind. And while iTunes may have the biggest online music store out there, it doesn't offer the all-you-can-eat music subscription services available to its competitors. (Just mention that to a cocky iPod owner, and watch him/her turn green-eyed with envy.)
I've matched the new iPods against some of their toughest rivals (or at least, these are my non-iPod picks—feel free to flame me in the comments below), compared them spec-for-spec, and tipped the player that I think has the advantage. I haven't tested all these players in person, so I'm not declaring any winners just yet.
So, without further ado...let the competition begin!
iPod Touch vs. Samsung Yepp YP-P2
Price: The Touch goes for $400 (16GB) or $300 (8GB)—ouch. Samsung hasn't coughed up pricing for the YP-P2 (due in stores later this month, with 4GB and 8GB versions), but I'll wager that it'll be considerably cheaper. Advantage: Deuce (until Yepp details arrive).Overall advantage: iPod Touch
iPod Nano vs. Sansa View
Wireless: Nothing to say here; neither player does Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Advantage: Deuce. Overall advantage: Sansa View
iPod Classic vs. Zune
Price: The 30GB Zune benefits from a recent $50 price drop, bringing its sticker price down to $200. But while the cheapest iPod Classic is pricier at $250, it packs in a monster 80GB hard drive (a $350 160GB Classic is also available. In other words, the Classic gives you much more storage bang for the buck. Advantage: Classic.Overall advantage: iPod Classic
Post-game analysis: It looks like the new iPods edged their rivals in two of our three matches, but these weren't routs by any means—indeed, as more and better would-be iPod killers come to market, the battle for MP3 champion may well get blown wide open. So while the iPod may have the upper hand for now, I wouldn't feel too superior the next time you see someone grooving to tunes on a Yepp.
So, let's hear it: who still wants an iPod, and who's ready to jump ship (or who already has, for that matter)?
Note: I've updated this post to include the new Sansa View and add details from my hands-on review of the new iPods.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
the LG prada was released in Europe and Aisa months before the Iphone, it won't be imported since our cell networks are not up to the standards of other countries. That is the same reason the iphone will not sell overseas http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/lgs-ke850-prada-official-iphone-says-wha/
1 more thing... you people talk about quality of music on your DMP... um yeah hopefully you are encoding it right. On top of that, remember that most people encode thier music less than 160kbs. If you are a true audiophile that complains about quality of music you wouldnt be using a DMP.
ZUNE IS SO MUCH BETTER THEN i-POD!!!!!!
Even if you don't find the iPod to be superior nothing microsoft or anyone else has developed can touch itunes, in terms of ease of use and the itunes store dwarfs anything else.
I own as well as have worked with several different types of the MP3 player. I think this article in a way is bias (there are other good mp3 players out there0 but i think that the i-podhas been the easiest to use. Sure, the efficiancy of some of the tools on there are worthless, but that doesnt make it a bad product. Im hoping that there will be a company other than apple to come out with one; its one of those things you dont need, but they make life easier :)
BOOOOO to Ipod, Everyone owns an Ipod and refuses to leave the little cult circle and be different. I got a Zune last year and love it a million times more than the Ipod I previously owned. Ipod was one of the first major's and its the only thing theyre really good at is making MP3 players. I say we shift to the Microsoft revolution!
And about the touch screen, who wants to smudge a screen? Even with a stylus it will happen, and a screen protector would dull the communication.
Simply put, Apple rules the MP3 world, everyone else is still trying to play catch-up.
wowza, how much did apple pay them to write this crap
When I looked at buying a "media player" I looked long and hard at an ipod, but when it came down to it I bought a Creative vision W. The 60gb version I bought has simple controls that aren't difficult for anyone, simple play/pause fwd, reverse and up down selection and back keys are not difficult to use. I bought the vision W because I needed something small but I wanted a bigger screen than the ipod was offering. In addition I can use my vision W as a photography tool on the road as it has a built in expansion slot for microdrives and cf cards. TV out lets me place all my movies on my player and be mobile to a friends house without having to take a stack of dvd cases everywhere. In addition the zen has a removable rechargable battery, which anyone who has done their homework knows that Ipods have had problems with their built in batteries dying after a time. The only disadvantage of my Zen that I have found it the lack of accesories. I would love an fm tranceiver so that I can play my mp3s in the car on a trip, but that's really the only downside that I see(actually now that I look Belkin makes one for approx $50, a little pricey I think).
well i really like my 30 gig ipod . but i will say i was very disapointed when the new models arived. no blue tooth no fm radio no mic. the battery life is awsome but thats all i like about the new ipod clasic. why buy a new one. they really didnt change much.
apple (steve jobs) is going to take over the world......
Most of the people who scream "Apple rox all!" really cant think for themselves nor do they know how to use the interweb to do research. They see the shiny, futuristic, pretty design of apple's products and scream "Its awesome, its REVOLUTIONARY!" yet they know nothing about what else is on the market. That is one thing I will give to Apple is they sure know how to snag the innocent consumers in with advertisement. How many people are tired of the iphone commercials raise your hand and say I *raises hand* "I"
if you know anything about your ipod you can transfer all your music from one computer to another its not very hard, i have a classic 30 gig ipod and a 30 gig zune. and i must say if you have both its ipod all the way, if im putting a movie on my zune i better let it sit there all day cause it has to convert it even though i allready converted it to zune format. with my ipod i convert once and its done, if you can find me a mp3 player that is easier to use then my ipod i would like to see that.
chuvaness........ eclavou............. chenesz................ did you get me? if you didn't get it.......you are churva!!!
ITunes music store is now DRM free. Get to buying.
I've had a few different MP3 players in my day, starting with the Rio, a Creative hard drive model, and a mostly generic 20 GB hard drive model. I then went to an iPod back in the 3rd generation. Whenever the hard drive dies on my 3rd gen, I think I am going to stay with iPod. Of the ones I used, it has far and away the easiest interface, and iTunes makes music management easy. Far more so then competing products. Heck, when I got my iPod, it didnt have iTunes, it used musicmatch. I was so happy when I downloaded itunes for windows and saw what music management was supposed to be like. Some corrections to earlier comments: iPods and iTunes play any format you want with the exception of copy protected .wma files FLAC, and ogg files. iPod and iTunes are not limiting on your media types, they play any MP3 and any standard .aac file or protected .aac file. It is not really limited at all in terms of format Also, I prefer to get my stuff on CD that I rip to mp3 or aac, I dont use the iTunes store online much. I have maybe 2 dozen songs bought over almost 4 years. I dont dislike the store, its well laid out in my opinion, i just prefer my full album art in a package i can hold. One other thing, you do not neccessarily need to use itunes on your computer to use your iPod. While I think it is the best program out there for music management (it has admittedly been a couple years since I tinkered with other programs), there exist several 3rd party solutions for using the iPod with your PC. Just my $.02
please go take a dmp in the forest
Its all about the interface people and all of the iPods win hands down.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 Posted by laurenloogomez on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:57PM EDT Report Abuse
i would get a not apple one xcept 4 i have an ipod classic that works fine and dont feel like buying a new one but when it breaks which it hasnt done in 6yrs i gettin a non ipod