Redbox slapped with lawsuit over "illegal" late fees

Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:01AM EDT

See Comments (82)

Festooned with the slogan "no late or hidden fees ever," Redbox's bright red kiosks offer rental DVDs for a dollar a night; keep a movie longer than 24 hours, and you'll be charged $1 for every subsequent night, or you can keep a title for $25. So ... are those charges for additional nights de-facto—and hence, "illegal"—late fees, as a new lawsuit claims?

Video Business reports that the class-action lawsuit was filed by Illinois resident Laurie Piechur, who apparently got fired up after she found twin $25 charges on her credit card for two Redbox movies she never returned ("27 Dresses" and "Fool's Gold").

The lawsuit alleges that Redbox is "not telling the truth" when it says it offers "easy $1 a night DVD rentals" with "no late fees ... ever," because "Redbox charges its customers who return a movie even one minute late a late fee in the form of an illegal penalty," according to Video Business.

Well, let's see here. According to Redbox's F.A.Q., if you rent a DVD from one of its kiosks on a given day and only want to pay $1 for a single night, it's due back by 9 p.m. the following evening. Keep a movie past 9:01 p.m. the next night, and you owe a buck for a second night, and so on. After 25 days—for a total of $25—the movie's yours.

As Courthouse News Service notes, the class-action suit claims that Redbox's $1-a-night rental fee is more than "the reasonable estimate of the actual damages Redbox incurs for a late return," and that the $25 fee for keeping a movie is more than triple the $7 that Redbox charges for used DVDs.

Well, maybe so ... but to my mind, Redbox's rental terms couldn't be clearer: it's "$1 per night," which (to me, anyway) means a buck for one night, $2 for two nights, $3 for three nights ... et cetera. It's printed right on the kiosk. Perhaps there's a specific legal definition of what constitutes a "late fee" and how much it should be, but as a consumer, Redbox's buck-a-night rental contract sounds reasonable to me. And if you don't want to pay $25 for "Fool's Gold," well ... you should probably return it sooner rather than later.

OK, but couldn't you consider those charges "late fees," even though Redbox claims it doesn't have late fees? Guess it depends on your definition of "late." From the Redbox F.A.Q.: "At Redbox, there is no such thing as a late fee. Each night you will be charged the additional night fee plus tax."

So, what do you think: Are we talking a frivolous lawsuit here? Or should Redbox drop its "no late fees" claim?

Related:
Redbox sued for 'illegal' multi-day rental fees [Video Business]

Comments on Redbox slapped with lawsuit over "illegal" late fees

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by dianahopenet on Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:28AM EDT Report Abuse

    Of course it's a frivolous lawsuit. There seems to be something really off about the facts of the case. Why did she get fired for two $25 fees on her credit card? Is she using her business credit card for personal use? Not a good idea. I think Laurie needs to pay attention and grow up.

  • 2 Posted by garthasuarus on Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:31AM EDT Report Abuse

    Or... How about Redbox does one of two things: A) Stops advertising that it doesn't charge a late fee, or B) Stops charging late fee's. Because yeah, if you're 1 minute late, you're getting charged a fee. Just like Blockbuster and every other video rental company.

  • 3 Posted by jmw250 on Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:37AM EDT Report Abuse

    Get a life lady! As Ben pointed out, Redbox's policy can't be any more clear. You kept the movie for 25 nights, you can reasonably be expected to pay for the opportunity to view the movie each of those nights. If 25 bucks is too much for a used DVD, then return it.

  • 4 Posted by enfys2004 on Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:49AM EDT Report Abuse

    She got "fired up", diana, not fired... and she had no business getting fired up... SHE NEVER RETURNED THE DVDS...what did she expect, to be able to keep them for free? It's like Ben said, a buck a night is a buck a NIGHT... it's completely frivilous... just another case of people thinking they're entitled to something (usually MONEY) for absolutely no reason... it makes me sick what people in this country not only stoop to for money, but are ALLOWED to stoop to.

  • 5 Posted by julieo291979 on Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:58AM EDT Report Abuse

    This lady is an idiot,she really thought that she could keep the movie for only $1?? It says everything about the late fee's on the box it's not hidden. I read it the first time I used it. Some people just don't want to take repsondibilty for there own actions and abmit they screwed up. This lawsuit won't go no where.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.