Total HD Format Bites the Dust

Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:56AM EDT

See Comments (10)

Remember Total HD, the Blu-ray/HD DVD combo disc format unveiled back in January that was supposed to end the HD format war? Well, now you can forget it (if you remembered at all, given that no Total HD discs were ever released)—the nascent format is apparently dead on arrival.

Ars Technica reports that Warner Brothers (the studio behind Total HD) has decided to put Total HD on ice—permanently—after doubts surfaced about whether consumers and retailers really wanted HD discs with Blu-ray content on one side and HD DVD video on the other.

Frankly, I'm not surprised. When Warner Brothers first announced Total HD at CES in January, it pitched the new discs as a way to help consumers confused by the competing HD formats—you'd just pick up your Total HD disc and you wouldn't have to worry whether you had a Blu-ray or HD DVD deck (and retailers would only have to stock one type of disc). That would work fine if all the movie studios were supporting both Blu-ray and HD DVD (as, indeed, Warner Brothers does), but they don't; even if Total HD was moving ahead, you wouldn't see a Total HD copy of "Casino Royale" from Blu-ray-only Sony anytime soon. Now, multiformat players...that's a different story (if only they were a little cheaper).

Of course, all this begs the question: will Warner Brothers—now one of the last studios to support both HD DVD and Blu-ray—stay that way, or will it pull a Paramount and drop one format or the other? Rumors were flying last week that the HD DVD camp had offered Warners a truckload of cash to dump Blu-ray, but according to Ars Technica, the studio is staying format-neutral for now.

So, how do you think the demise of Total HD affects the format war? Or do you think the format was is unwinnable (check out Chris' post)?

Related:
Total HD disc format looks to be a total bust

Comments on Total HD Format Bites the Dust

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by vochoa0371 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well, it is the same with Tv's that offer 1080P... How can one purchase a high quality TV and your TV provider does not broadcast a 1080p signal. That is quite bad. I have not tested blue-ray or HD DVD players hope this technology becomes less expensive. Americans are cheap. Yes, we are...

  • 2 Posted by matt_archbold2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    How can Total HD be part of the fight if they never stepped in the ring? This has no effect on the current format war going on.

  • 3 Posted by jakielf on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    well if you have a hd tv i dont think it will matter what kind of dvd you play, I think it would look great anyway. If they put the prices too high no one will buy dvd players, and they will lose money.

  • 4 Posted by somebodys_here on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    not totally surprising as it never had any really good movies to start off with anyway.

  • 5 Posted by icysapphire64 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    The public simply isn't interested in HD-DVD, period, because a lot of people don't want to have to go out and buy all their movies again. That, and players are still way too expensive.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.