Universal Prepping $5/Month Music Service?

Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:59AM EDT

See Comments (3)

First, Universal Music refused to extend its iTunes contract with Apple, then it began offering DRM-free tunes through the likes of Rhapsody and Wal-Mart. Now, according to BusinessWeek, the music giant is looking to take on iTunes with Total Music, a service that would offer all-you-can-eat tunes for $5 a month.

BusinessWeek reports that Universal has already enlisted the help of Sony BMG and is in talks with Warner Music about partnering on Total Music—and between them, the three labels represent about 75 percent of the music sold here in the U.S., according to the story.

So, how exactly would the labels afford to essentially give away their catalogs for just $5 (or less) a month? The BusinessWeek story says that the labels would lean on MP3 player manufacturers to subsidize much [Edit: or all] of the subscription costs, with the idea being that the sweet subscription deal would significantly boost sales. I'm guessing that unlike Universal's DRM-free "experiment" with Rhapsody, tunes from Total Music would come loaded with Windows Media DRM—meaning they'd work on the Zune and Windows-friendly players like those made by Toshiba and Samsung, but not the iPod.

It's an interesting idea, and I'm certainly in favor with any new service that competes with the behemoth that is iTunes—for us consumers, more choice is always a good thing. Of course, the hurdle that Total Music would have to overcome is the iPod factor: that is, how to convince the general public that there are non-iPod MP3 players out there worth buying. Personally, I'd be sorely tempted by the idea of an ultra-cheap subscription service with one of the new wireless-syncing Zunes; imagine a self-updating playlist of new music that automatically syncs up to your player each night. Pretty cool.

Related:
Universal Music Takes on iTunes [BusinessWeek]

Comments on Universal Prepping $5/Month Music Service?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by theyowman on Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:48AM EDT Report Abuse

    I would go legal for that deal (and by 'legal' i mean actually pay for music) as long as all three labels did in fact commit and there wasn't a "mininum" subsciption. My guess is that $5 would not cover every catalog of every record company that commits, i'm sure there is a catch and an inevitable "premium membership". Something to look into though. ps. I hate itunes.

  • 2 Posted by jaspersara369 on Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    The Creative Labs "ZEN" might finally unseat the iPod! I hope so, the Zen sounds MUCH better than an iPod!!!!! As far as the Zune is concerned, DRM has got to go if Microsoft hopes to sell very many of these!

  • 3 Posted by jancie9 on Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    The intro price of $5/month (my guess) will increase substantially once/if people buy into the new tech hardware...certainly if the 4 majors stick together. If I was an artist I would be very curious as to how the labels plan to account to me and what the deductions will be. Im not sure who is greedier itunes or record labels - my guess is they are about the same so as a consumer I wouldnt be doing a victory dance just yet.

More Posts: First Prev 1 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.