Verizon Wireless to Open Its Network to "Any" Device

Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:48AM EST

See Comments (226)

In what could well be a game-changing move, Verizon Wireless just announced that it will open up its network to non-Verizon phones and applications—provided they meet "the minimum technical standard"—starting next year.

What does that mean for you? In short, Verizon's news could mean many more options in terms of the handsets you can use on its network. Up until now, the carrier (as well as its competitors) has carefully screened the phones in its lineup, keeping a close eye on the potential bottom line and shying away from the hottest handsets available in, say, Europe or Asia. Same goes with mobile applications; as it stands now, Verizon offers only a handful of hand-picked (and often pretty stale) mobile apps to run on its data networks. Hopefully, Verizon's announcement will lead to more—and better—programs to install on your phone.

Naturally, there are caveats. In a press release, the carrier said that it will publish technical standards that must be met before any non-Verizon handset or mobile app is allowed on the network; a $20 million certification lab is being prepped for testing purposes. In a conference call with reporters, Verizon execs promised to work with anyone looking to approve a device to run on the network, but we'll have to wait and see exactly how strict the "minimum technical standard" will be. Also, keep in mind that Verizon runs a CDMA network, which is incompatible with SIM-carrying GSM phones like the iPhone. (Sprint is also a CDMA carrier; AT&T and T-Mobile run GSM networks.) As fellow blogger Chris Null points out, there's a dearth of cool, unlocked CDMA phones available for sale in the U.S., but that may well change in the wake of Verizon's announcement.

Of course, many questions remain unanswered, but as far as the broad strokes go, it's exciting—and unexpected—news. The big U.S. carriers—and Verizon Wireless in particular—have jealously guarded their networks from outside devices and applications, leaving phone manufacturers and application developers basically at the beck and call of the big wireless operators (leading to the oft-repeated phrase, "the carrier is king"), so it's something of a shock to hear Verizon announce that it's throwing open its doors (well, more or less).

So, why the change? I'd guess that several factors are at work. On the one hand, you've got pressure from search behemoth Google, which just announced its open Android software platform and will soon be bidding for its own swath of wireless spectrum. On the other hand, there's the iPhone, which will be open for third-party software development come February—and which has also been the target of hackers and ordinary folks alike, who've been furiously trying to unlock it for use on any wireless network.

Note: I've updated this post to include more background information, plus info from a conference call that followed the initial announcement.

Related:
Verizon Wireless opens to other phones [Yahoo! News]

Comments on Verizon Wireless to Open Its Network to "Any" Device

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 47 Posted by jrl711 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    This could be it!! This could be the straw that broke the proverbial comunication camels back!!

  • 48 Posted by jason_omdahl on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    auburn...change your address out of coverage area...then have them waive the etf

  • 51 Posted by aaschneider2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    Another point to note is that phones purchased with the contracts are highly subsidized. The prices for these phones will always be lower than a third party phone without a contract. Freedom to choose different phones with different apps will come with a price.

  • 52 Posted by conemar2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    all of these people commenting here need to hear this, do business with American companies, if you don't want to do that get out the country! trueamerican@yahoo.com

  • 53 Posted by jason_omdahl on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    I hate Verizon. Their phones do not work in Europe. AT&T's do! I am waiting for my contract is over and then...see ya!

  • 54 Posted by beemer932001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    this is gangsta...now i can buy this phone i was looking at while is asia

  • 55 Posted by kawai_ind on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    Anything would be better than Sprint, AT&T and Nextel. I have had service with them and it stinks.

  • 56 Posted by jrl711 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have verizon right now and i think it would be nice to get a different phone but still have the same plan. I have my 4th chocolate due to breaking and i figure once i get a new one i would like to get a different brand phone instead of verizons. this plan could work now 8~)

  • 57 Posted by jason_omdahl on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    I love my service with verizon. I had thought about getting an iPhone but I didn't want to switch to AT&T. hopefully Apple will make a CDMA version of the phone.

  • 58 Posted by jrl711 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    i don't think apple will make a CDMA version of the iphone because GSM is the leading global mobile telephone standard, the USA's CDMA carriers are just being stuck in the past! and this idea of "opening up a network" already exists in other places so once again, a US carrier is just trying to play smart when in actual fact, they're lagging behind the rest of the world in the mobile telephone department

  • 59 Posted by neenee1897 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    I was with Sprint for about 5 years and just got fed up with all their bull so I switched to Verizon. I love them so far and its been about a year or so since I switched. Im glad theyre expanding their horizons, Id hate to have to switch carriers again.

  • 60 Posted by rtshudy2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's funny...I've used AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon and no matter who the carrier has been, there have been problems like those described by some of the other bloggers here. Ultimately, if I have learned one thing from it all, it is that I must assume full responsibility for researching the products and services and be fully comfortable with them before I enter into any long-term contract or financial committment. So, if you're frustrated with your carrier now...trust me, the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.

  • 61 Posted by tom_templeton on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have used the open network in germany and afghanistan. It is the best idea a American company could come up with as long as the rest of the telecom companies do the same. T-mobile was the first to do it overseas, because its a german based company, but it didnt follow its german roots as opening its network. Verizon keep it up!!!

  • 63 Posted by cellphoneadam on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    this is all marketing propaganda, they will not let any phone come to be used on there network, plus way would any American born person do business with any foriegn carrier ???? are we losing our minds here , remember 9-11 ? for all you young people here , do business with an American Company, the only American owned and was the inventory or the telephone, is bellsouth/At&t/ Cingular wireless. wake up people, do fall for the foriegn companies, if you do some day we will all be sorry ! think about that ! ah

  • 64 Posted by brikap.rm on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    As a Verizon customer, I can't upgrade and get a decent price on a phone like a NEW customer could. I understand the strategy, but I don't think it's right. Hopefully that will change too. It's something you should be told up-front as a new customer. VERIZON give your long-time customers a break and allow a hardware upgrade for a decent price.

  • 65 Posted by quynh_dang on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    Oops, I meant ATT and T-Mobile, not ATT and Sprint.

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.