Verizon Wireless to Open Its Network to "Any" Device

Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:48AM EST

See Comments (226)

In what could well be a game-changing move, Verizon Wireless just announced that it will open up its network to non-Verizon phones and applications—provided they meet "the minimum technical standard"—starting next year.

What does that mean for you? In short, Verizon's news could mean many more options in terms of the handsets you can use on its network. Up until now, the carrier (as well as its competitors) has carefully screened the phones in its lineup, keeping a close eye on the potential bottom line and shying away from the hottest handsets available in, say, Europe or Asia. Same goes with mobile applications; as it stands now, Verizon offers only a handful of hand-picked (and often pretty stale) mobile apps to run on its data networks. Hopefully, Verizon's announcement will lead to more—and better—programs to install on your phone.

Naturally, there are caveats. In a press release, the carrier said that it will publish technical standards that must be met before any non-Verizon handset or mobile app is allowed on the network; a $20 million certification lab is being prepped for testing purposes. In a conference call with reporters, Verizon execs promised to work with anyone looking to approve a device to run on the network, but we'll have to wait and see exactly how strict the "minimum technical standard" will be. Also, keep in mind that Verizon runs a CDMA network, which is incompatible with SIM-carrying GSM phones like the iPhone. (Sprint is also a CDMA carrier; AT&T and T-Mobile run GSM networks.) As fellow blogger Chris Null points out, there's a dearth of cool, unlocked CDMA phones available for sale in the U.S., but that may well change in the wake of Verizon's announcement.

Of course, many questions remain unanswered, but as far as the broad strokes go, it's exciting—and unexpected—news. The big U.S. carriers—and Verizon Wireless in particular—have jealously guarded their networks from outside devices and applications, leaving phone manufacturers and application developers basically at the beck and call of the big wireless operators (leading to the oft-repeated phrase, "the carrier is king"), so it's something of a shock to hear Verizon announce that it's throwing open its doors (well, more or less).

So, why the change? I'd guess that several factors are at work. On the one hand, you've got pressure from search behemoth Google, which just announced its open Android software platform and will soon be bidding for its own swath of wireless spectrum. On the other hand, there's the iPhone, which will be open for third-party software development come February—and which has also been the target of hackers and ordinary folks alike, who've been furiously trying to unlock it for use on any wireless network.

Note: I've updated this post to include more background information, plus info from a conference call that followed the initial announcement.

Related:
Verizon Wireless opens to other phones [Yahoo! News]

Comments on Verizon Wireless to Open Its Network to "Any" Device

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by massagehope on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    I don't think this will bring VZ customers cool new phones anytime soon. But anytime the carrier with the best network makes a move like this, you have to be excited.

  • 8 Posted by ebaronee on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hopefully, there will not be bandwidth or usage availability problems. I am sure that has been thought of and taken care of, right?

  • 9 Posted by bbmaternityinc@att.net on Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:41PM EST Report Abuse

    You get 14 days to return a Verizon phone. If you are within that time period, bring the phones back after doing some research on what ones are Mac compatible.

  • 12 Posted by bbmaternityinc@att.net on Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:42PM EST Report Abuse

    Call verizon and complain I did about my chocolate and they gave me a 149.99 credit to a new phone.

  • 14 Posted by tinnanorton on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is not about your chocolates.this is about you not researching the handset as well.Verizonwireless is the best network,and thats why EVERYONE wants to be on it !! Plus,you have a 30 day worry free policy with Verizonwireless.If you are sooooo unhappy,you should have canceled your plan or swapped the device out!! Shame on the rep.,......But your the D-bag for nor returning it.

  • 15 Posted by dhocott@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a verizon phone that is GSM so I dont see why an iphone wouldn't work on the network.

  • 16 Posted by coreybiemiller on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a Chocolate and I run it on my MAC without a problem.

  • 17 Posted by englishprof66 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    how about the sidekick from t-mobil will that work for this new plan?

  • 18 Posted by ebaronee on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    why would you get something because someone said its macintosh compatible? Nothing should be macintosh compatiable because Macintosh isnt campatible to anything itself! Macintosh shouldnt even exist. I cant tell you how many times their computers Fd my papers up in the computer lab because I couldn't print them out anywhere when I was in college, because MAC wasnt compatible with any of the printers on campus! this is still the problem today. They are out there by themselves in left feild.

  • 19 Posted by rrobin721@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    How is this different than what AT&T and T-Mobile are already doing?* Any GSM phone that operates on the appropriate frequency is "allowed" to use AT&T's or T-Mobile's network, without the necessary "certification lab" that Verizon says will be required to put a phone on their network. All you need to do is insert your carrier SIM and talk away. * I understand the difference between a GSM network and Verizon's CDMA network; I'm just saying that this doesn't seem to be as earth------ tering as the press releases would suggest.

  • 20 Posted by tom_templeton on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    Congrats to all Americans. Our networks have now caught up to where the rest of the world was in 1996!

  • 21 Posted by filmstud79 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    The thing that I don't like about this is that Verizon is going to allow untested equipment on their network which means that the customer might not get the same experience (dropped calls, call connectivity, call quality, etc) that they would get with a phone that has gone through the testing process. Very bad move by Verizon.

  • 22 Posted by filmstud79 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    There is not a better option for businesses than Sprint right now

  • 24 Posted by danna_allison@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    for the most part i like verizon. i have actually used T- mobile for a while and had tons of probs with them. for verizon i have had very few dropped call like 1-2 every 4 months. and i use my phone a lot, in and out of elivators and in buildings. really the only problem areas are malls, mostly because the build the building with extra copper to stop cell phone use in stores "to enhance the shopping experiance". when i had t- mobile i dropped calls every day, just standing out side my front door, and i lived about 2 miles from a tower.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.