Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:48AM EST
See Comments (226)
In what could well be a game-changing move, Verizon Wireless just announced that it will open up its network to non-Verizon phones and applications—provided they meet "the minimum technical standard"—starting next year.
What does that mean for you? In short, Verizon's news could mean many more options in terms of the handsets you can use on its network. Up until now, the carrier (as well as its competitors) has carefully screened the phones in its lineup, keeping a close eye on the potential bottom line and shying away from the hottest handsets available in, say, Europe or Asia. Same goes with mobile applications; as it stands now, Verizon offers only a handful of hand-picked (and often pretty stale) mobile apps to run on its data networks. Hopefully, Verizon's announcement will lead to more—and better—programs
to install on your phone.
Naturally, there are caveats. In a press release, the carrier said that it will publish technical standards that must be met before any non-Verizon handset or mobile app is allowed on the network; a $20 million certification lab is being prepped for testing purposes. In a conference call with reporters, Verizon execs promised to work with anyone looking to approve a device to run on the network, but we'll have to wait and see exactly how strict the "minimum technical standard" will be. Also, keep in mind that Verizon runs a CDMA network, which is incompatible with SIM-carrying GSM phones like the iPhone. (Sprint is also a CDMA carrier; AT&T and T-Mobile run GSM networks.) As fellow blogger Chris Null points out, there's a dearth of cool, unlocked CDMA phones available for sale in the U.S., but that may well change in the wake of Verizon's announcement.
Of course, many questions remain unanswered, but as far as the broad strokes go, it's exciting—and unexpected—news. The big U.S. carriers—and Verizon Wireless in particular—have jealously guarded their networks from outside devices and applications, leaving phone manufacturers and application developers basically at the beck and call of the big wireless operators (leading to the oft-repeated phrase, "the carrier is king"), so it's something of a shock to hear Verizon announce that it's throwing open its doors (well, more or less).
So, why the change? I'd guess that several factors are at work. On the one hand, you've got pressure from search behemoth Google, which just announced its open Android software platform and will soon be bidding for its own swath of wireless spectrum. On the other hand, there's the iPhone, which will be open for third-party software development come February—and which has also been the target of hackers and ordinary folks alike, who've been furiously trying to unlock it for use on any wireless network.
Note: I've updated this post to include more background information, plus info from a conference call that followed the initial announcement.
Related:
Verizon Wireless opens to other phones [Yahoo! News]
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I HATE, JUST HATE SPRINT THEY ALWAYS OVERCHARGE ME IN THE PHONE BILLS!!! AND I ALWAYS GET A BAD CONNECTION!!!
This is just a clever marketing ploy... It has become more and more easy to unlock phones and Verizon realizes this. So instead of turning away potential users from using their desired handsets, Verizon will now welcome them to do so, thus increasing their users. Not to mention it will help to promote some of the newest services available here in the U.S. that Verizon utilizes via 3 G technology. I’m sure their marketing will go something like this… “Verizon, the carrier that allows you to use more services with more devices in more places”
www.juicecaster.com
I have had them all including AT&T a company that used to be great(I am retired from them). Verizon has the best coverage for my businesses and employees. The rest are not even a close second.
Oh, this is Grean NOT!!! So Verizon is going to end up being like AT&T, aka BellSouth... Great for the employees; they will make much more $$$$$$$$$... Hey, maybe they can start having there employees start paying their child support and take care of there children...
I don't know what the big deal is. I've been using unlocked European phones on T-Mobile's GSM network for the last four years. Why would anyone want a phone that only complies to a local standard, when they could have the ability to use one with a universally accepted (except for here, of course) standard? If my phone breaks, for example, I can take the SIM out and put it in my buddy's (unlocked) GSM phone and use it as mine- to call home and ask my roomate if I can borrow his extra GSM phone until I get mine fixed. Isn't that better than just being able to use a third-party phone still locked to an obscure standard?
We need "satellite service" to compete with ON-STAR so it wouldn't be necessary to buy GM vehicles!!!!!!
poo:) poo:)
This is just a clever marketing ploy... It has become more and more easy to unlock phones and Verizon realizes this. So instead of turning away potential users from using their desired handsets, Verizon will now welcome them to do so, thus increasing their users. Not to mention it will help to promote some of the newest services available here in the U.S. that Verizon utilizes via 3 G technology. I’m sure their marketing will go something like this… “Verizon, the carrier that allows you to use more services with more devices”
Verizon sold its operations here in Puerto Rico to CLARO. But i still connect to the internet trough verizon so i wonder if they still got some actions on the company and/or this will affect in any way
Which carrier is the best? I have a family of five...
If VZ Wireless stinks...then they ALL stink...they really had no choice if they wanted to remain a major player...
Sprint beat them to the punch months ago. Just didn't get the media coverage.
its all about at&t it just raises the bars
Helio Fin kicks butt!
Will Verizon consider buying old cell phone as trade in cost value (saylike 25%-50%) accoridng to phone type. This will allow verizon to recycle and refurbish; and not to mention contributing to mimizing the waste factor for our country. If cell phones carrier are still going to have contracts for the year of 2008, Will Verizon maybe consider buying out the contract on a trade phone and service carrier including decreasing contract time or eliminating the contract.
I've had multiple carriers and the only one I have found that works in Butler, Ohio or Worthington, PA(Places I have worked and lived) is Verizon. My boss could receive calls in Butler on her Alltel phone, but couldn't make calls. In Worthington I almost got Sprint to work, but I had to stand on my front porch to make or receive calls. But then, I also could care less about how "cool" my phone is. If it makes and receives calls without problems, that's all I really care about.
CDMA phones are not any good. Just take a look at the marketplace all phones people want like the iPhone are GSM not CDMA. By the way AT&T has a two year exclusive on the iPhone so even if Apple were to develop a CDMA iPHone they would need to wait untill June 2009 to sell it to Verizon
The I phone was originally made for Verizon and apple was too strict with its limitations, so Verizon cancelled its negotiaions with Apple. Plus by the time the I-phone is approved for VZW something better will be out anyway.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 Posted by ryan_krishnakumar on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:57PM EDT Report Abuse
that sounds more like a local store thats crap rstrb8r