Blu-ray, HD DVD Camps Wooing Warners

Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:12PM EST

See Comments (13)

Here's a scenario that "Survivor" fans know well: two equally matched voting blocks stuck in a stalemate, with a single, undecided player suddenly the key to the game. Both sides wine and dine the holdout, hoping to break the tie. The two tribes are Blu-ray and HD DVD. The holdout? Warner Brothers, the last major movie studio still making HD discs in both formats. And according to BusinessWeek, the wooing has reached a fever pitch.

The news magazine reports that representative from both camps are reaching out—way out—to Warner Brothers, with Toshiba HD DVD business lead Yoshihide Fujii making three trips to the United States in recent months, while Sony CEO and Blu-ray proponent Sir Howard Stringer has been personally making his case to top execs at Time Warner, the parent company of Warner Brothers.

The stakes are high for the warring HD camps. Blu-ray has exclusive deals with Disney, Sony (natch, given Sony's massive stake in Blu-ray), Fox, and MGM, while HD DVD has Universal, Paramount, and DreamWorks. The HD DVD group lured Paramount and DreamsWorks (which had previously supported both formats) earlier this year, and Sony clearly hopes to strike back by getting Warners to go Blu-ray-only.

The BusinessWeek story argues that Blu-ray may have the edge in the wooing, for a couple of reasons: It has a base of 2.7 million players (including Blu-ray-equipped PlayStation 3 consoles) in the United States, compared to 750,000 for HD DVD (including Xbox 360 add-on HD drives), and Blu-ray discs have been outselling HD DVD at a two-to-one ratio in recent weeks. All true...although cheaper HD DVD stand-alone players easily won the Black Friday sales way with a 62 percent market share, compared to just 37 percent for Blu-ray.

So, let's say Warners did jump to one camp or the other come next month, when the curtain rises on CES in Vegas. Would such a move be a knockout blow for the loser? I doubt it. Both camps have serious backing—Toshiba, Unversal, and Microsoft all have stakes in HD DVD, with Sony the big muscle on the Blu-ray side—and each side still has studio exclusives locked in (Paramount, which distributes hits like "Transformers," is signed with HD DVD until about 2009, and Disney, with franchises like "Pirates of the Caribbean," is cozy with Blu-ray). I think this war has a good 12 months (or more) to go, regardless of what Warners does.

That said, if Warner Brothers does go ahead and choose a side, it'll be a blow for those of us who already have HD players of one format for another (Warners has some big movies in its catalog...you've heard of "The Matrix" and "Batman," right?), although it'll make pricey but slowly-getting-cheaper dual-format HD decks that much more attractive.

What do you think? Will Warners choose a side? Would that matter to you if you're shopping for an HD disc player?

Related:
Next-Gen DVDs: Advantage, Sony [BusinessWeek, via High-Def Digest]

Comments on Blu-ray, HD DVD Camps Wooing Warners

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by gregorylopez4881 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm not sure which side they're going to choose but I'm going to wait for a clear-cut winner before I choose a format. Good article...

  • 2 Posted by leontrucchi on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    this war between Blueray and HD DVD would never end,in my opion if you want to watch High definition movie,make sure you buy the player that can play both format,regardless who would leading the market.

  • 3 Posted by klacour on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    Still waiting on the sidelines. First, my HDTV (1080i)cannot even play the disks at full DEF (1080p). Second, I have a lot invested in current DVDs. Third, I am very happy with my upconvert DVD player - DVDs never looked so good. Last - way, way too much money for a player on either side. I have not paid over $150 for a DVD player, and my current upconvert Philips was $40 at Wal-Mart. Get a good dual player out there for less than $200, and I will think about it.

  • 4 Posted by ralph.f@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    Dual format player is a must until the dust settles. This war is driven not only by the choice of movies, but of course the power behind the gaming industry. It's sad that consumers are largely left in the dark about the incompatibilities between the two formats. Granted, plenty of information is available online for research, but a large number of people are still is unaware of the caveat when purchasing their player. Take a listen to the people shopping for HD disc players at your local electronics store. You will be surprised how little people really know about this format war!!

  • 5 Posted by clairyoungii on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    Truthfully, I was at Target the other day and they had Blue-Ray player working on a 27 in television. I don't know that much about Blue-Ray vs. HD-DVD, but what they had playing didn't look any better than a basic DVD. There was nothing stunning about it. I have seen very good HD programming/picture on a middle of the road HDTV, and what was playing out of this Sony Blue-Ray player on a middle of the road LCD HDTV was very poor quality in comparison. I wouldn't switch to either one because I am hoping for movies to come out on SD cards, or memory sticks. I think any type of disk format is going to be gone in 5-10 years anyway.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.