U.S. to (Finally) Phase Out Incandescent Bulbs

Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:25PM EST

See Comments (68)

Yep, it's really happening. President Bush just signed into law a massive energy bill that will, among other things, spell the end of traditional light bulb.

USA Today reports that the bill will phase out the good ole (but power-hungry) incandescent bulb over the next dozen years in favor more efficient fluorescent, halogen, and LED bulbs. Specifically, the new law holds that all light bulbs must be 25 to 35 percent more efficient by 2012 to 2014.

As the USA Today story points out, compact fluorescent bulbs cost about $2, or about four times as much as a typical incandescent bulb. That said, fluorescent bulbs last six times longer than the incandescent variety, and each one will chip about $5 off your annual electricity bill. You do the math.

Of course, part of the challenge will be weaning Americans off incandescent bulbs, which we've been happily using for 125 years. Chris Null has already written about how most of us hate fluorescent bulbs because of "their initial flicker, slow warm-up and slightly weird color." Well, energy-saving bulbs may look weird, but try these stats on for size: $40 billion in savings over the years spanning 2012 to 2030, 14 fewer coal-fired power plants, and 51 million fewer tons of carbon emissions annually (says USA Today). Give me all that, and I'll happily get used to the weird colors.

Related:
It's lights out for traditional light bulbs [USA Today]
Bush signs bill to boost vehicle fuel efficiency [Yahoo! News]

Comments on U.S. to (Finally) Phase Out Incandescent Bulbs

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by d.tfish95 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a few light bulbs that are in complince with this new law .... I am going to wait for my others to burn out before I replace them

  • 2 Posted by rorbincalendar on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    The energy bill signed by the president today is arguably the worst piece of energy legislation ever enacted into law. It will substantially increase the price of automobiles, increase highway fatalities, increase fuel prices, worsen air pollution, and force consumers to buy products (like MERCURY FILLED super-efficient light bulbs) that they manifestly -- and for very good reason -- do not want to buy. It will transfer huge amounts of wealth from the consumer to the farm lobby in the course of promoting a dubious product -- ethanol -- that will make energy supplies less reliable and promote a product that is giving financial incentive to cut down rain forests in order to plant corn and other ethanol producing crops.____________America and the world lost a major battle today! ______ SHAME, SHAME, SHAME on the powers in Washington today and SHAME, SHAME, ON ALL OF US FOR LETTING IT HAPPEN!

  • 3 Posted by mikedgolf40505 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree with the last post. Horrible bill!! How about putting something in their for "NEW" energy sources!!! Where is nuclear or drilling in Anwar? I will continue to use the old bulbs as long as I can. I want to increase, not decrease my carbon emissions!!!

  • 4 Posted by rorbincalendar on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    For anyone doubting air pollution associated with using ethanol-based fuel I have provided a link below._____ Atmospheric scientist Mark Jacobson of Stanford University findings show using ethanol-based fuel instead of gasoline would likely increase the ozone-related death rate in Los Angeles by 9 percent by 2020, according to a new study.____Here is a link-1__http://tinyurl.com/2donug______Link-2_____http://tinyurl.com/j73gd

  • 5 Posted by gmoffatt_pcpro on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    rorbincalendar, you make the CFL's sound like they are nothing but mercury. Look at this: http://biz.yahoo.com/usnews/071219/19_faq_the_end_of_the_light_bulb_as_we_know_it.html?.v=1&.pf=banking-budgeting About half way down, it talks about how much mercury is actually in a CFL (about 1/100th of a thermometer), and how incandescent bulbs aren't mercury free either. What you just said is the definition of FUD in my book.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.