The Pixel War Is So Over—Think ISO

Mon Nov 5, 2007 1:04AM EST

See Comments (15)

In the early days of digital cameras, it was a pixel race. Just before the holiday buying season each year, each manufacturer tried to lap the competition by throwing another megapixel of resolution at their camera. First two, then three, until we got to today's cameras that, at least at the consumer level, usually have between 5 and 10 megapixels. Some manufacturers are still marketing megapixels, but in truth, for most casual purposes, 5 to 8 megapixels is fine.

What's the new "mine is better than yours" of the digital camera world? There are several. One is ease of use. Companies are trying to make their cameras easier to use, make transferring images easier, printing easier, and so on. Another is the lens quality and range. Many cameras now come with zooms that range beyond the ordinary 3 to 1; a name-brand lens like Zeiss or Schneider-Kreuznach elevate the camera's status.

But there is another area of contention: The ability to take quality photographs in low light. In the pre-digital days, the sensitivity of film was measured in units called ISO, which comes from the International Organization for Standardization, the developer of the standard. For film, ISO 200 was a run-of-the-mill speed, usable in daylight, but requiring a flash indoors. For indoor photography without flash, you'd need an ISO of 800 or perhaps 1600. Most of today's digital cameras are, in broad stroke anyway, working in the neighborhood of ISO 200. They work well outside, but require a flash indoors. However, we're starting to see much more attention to high-ISO digital cameras, such as the new Kodak EasyShare V1253 and the Samsung L700.

With a high-ISO camera, you can get beautiful sunsets after the sun is below the horizon, when it's almost dark but subtle colors are everywhere. You can shoot cityscapes at night, lit only by streetlights and neon signs. If you want to capture the excitement of Times Square, photograph a high school musical without the distraction of flash, or get candids of the kids as they toddle indoors you need a high ISO.

Since digital cameras increase ISO speed by amplifying the signal, the ISO gotcha is that the higher the ISO speed, the higher the noise. If the signal is amplified too much—if ISO speeds are high enough—the photos can get really noisy.

One of the reasons that digital SLRs are so powerful is that they have large sensors, which are best for producing images without noise. So the quality of the sensors—how large they are—is important. An ordinary camera working at ISO 800 will produce a noisy, splotchy picture that won't look very good. New sensors with improved abilities to let in more light are beginning to appear in consumer digital cameras. These new high-ISO cameras will produce the best-quality picture in low-light conditions.

A nice tutorial can be found at Photoxels where this image is used to teach about various ISO speeds. And special thanks to Jerry Magee and my husband Kaare for their ISO insights. Any other thoughts are most welcome.

Top 5 Posts

Comments on The Pixel War Is So Over—Think ISO

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by nenadcuk on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Those are some nice pointers but sadly you're a little late on those news, the megapixels war was over... over half a year ago so its not any new news. I have been selling cameras for a while so i know what are I'm coming from. When it comes to ISO they have also been increasing the ISO and some cameras now have it up to 3200 ISO with 1600ISO being more and more of a standard so thats a little late too. You have the megapixels part because most cameras are now coming with 7.2 megapixels and higher. The one true thing to focus on are new camera features for cameras that are getting more and more mainstream which are Image Stabilization and Face Detection which is a standard in newer camers. So in conclusion the ISO war has been over, the consumers dont have many problems with at least 800 ISO a norm on older models and are now going past 3200. Megapixels have been done for a long while and the new features are the thing the manufacturers are now focusing on, like the new Sony feature which monitors a persons face and will automatically take a picture when it senses a smile or the cameras large 3.5" touchscreen LCD screen things like that. And about the image chip/megapixel chip they arent really doing much in that area because thats what seperates regular point and shoot cameras and SLR cameras. Well thats about all i wanna say right now but there is alot more info to look for if youre getting ready to getsomething top of the line.

  • 7 Posted by dyuhas on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    I doubt if the average P&S buyer knows ISO from USO. If the manufacturers promote "low light, no flash pictures" then high ISO cameras will sell. Personally I don't see how the noise issue can be solved given the sensor size in P&S cameras.

  • 9 Posted by mfmercado on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    Robin, you also forgot to mention that one of the reasons that DSLRs work better in low light are that they have the ability use lenses with large apertures (i.e. f/2.8 or better). Lenses with large apertures allow more light to reach the film or digital sensor. Small pocket size cameras are limited by their form factor (lenses with large apertures are by their nature larger) and therefore cannot take advantage of "fast" lenses. I have several lenses for my SLR and DSLR with a maximum f/stop of 1.4. Most compact digital cameras have f/stops that are around 5.6 or slower (since f/stop is the ratio of the focal length divided by the aperture diameter, larger f-numbers indicate smaller apertures). A lens with a f/stop of 1.4 allows 16x more light as a lens with an f-stop of 5.6. This is equivalent to being able to shoot 100 ISO on the DSLR and having to shoot 1600 ISO on the compact.

  • 10 Posted by brusap1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    INTERESTING THAT ISO IS SHOWING ITS IMPORTANCE AGAIN. WITH FILM FORMATS ISO AND ASA WERE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS. THANK YOU.

  • 11 Posted by watka@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    I just bought a 12 m.p Kodak 1275 ,. Wasn"t impressed with the picture quality, I have an Kodak 5 mp camera and I think its just as good.

  • 12 Posted by m_elfayoumi on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    Is this the limit for the resolution that can be percieved by the human eye ? in that case it is correct that the pixels race had to end, to give place to the ISO race. But I think that last would be based on the material of the CCD or the sensor array to absorb low light and the efficiency of the electronics that rebuild it in a picture (a pic beyond the human eye capability).

  • 13 Posted by mentisthemagnificent on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    Megapixels count for a lot, as do ISO speeds. Another thing to look at is minimum focus distance on the macro capability. I like the 1.6inch close focus ability of the Nikon Coolpix L5 for close ups of coins, gems, and such.

  • 14 Posted by sanpreet_janjua on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    so is a higher iso better? i need to buy a camera and am stuck between two. Bith have near enough the same specification, but one has a max iso range of 1250 and the other 400? which will be better?

  • 15 Posted by kulwicki35 on Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:29AM EDT Report Abuse

    Here's what gets me. I don't want high ISO. I use a Canon DSLR and shoot at least 90% of my photos at ISO 100. Please give me a camera that will shoot at ISO 64, or even better ISO 50. On a sunny day these speeds will make beautiful landscapes, and great photos of just about anything that isn't moving.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.